A US House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing revealed rare bipartisan agreement: stopping Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is a top national security goal. But lawmakers remain divided on how to achieve it.
By Bijoy Patro
Tensions between Iran and the West have surged to their highest point in years, with senior Iranian officials hinting at a nuclear pivot if attacked, while Western leaders warn that failure to reach a new agreement on Tehran’s nuclear program could trigger an all-out military confrontation. As diplomatic channels fray and economic pressure mounts, voices on both sides are sounding increasingly resigned to the possibility of conflict.
The US administration has been obsessed with a possible nuclear-weaponised Iran and the deadlock over the nuclear talks have raised the stakes.
Ali Larijani, a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, made international headlines on April 1 when he stated publicly that any military attack on Iran would push Tehran to build a nuclear bomb – a stark departure from official Iranian denials about pursuing nuclear weapons. “If America or Israel attacks Iran under the pretense of nuclear issues, Iran might move toward making an atomic bomb,” Larijani warned during a televised interview.
His remarks coincide with French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot’s dire forecast. In a statement to the French parliament, Barrot declared that “a military confrontation would appear to be almost inevitable” if a new agreement is not reached by October – when key provisions of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), known as the Iran nuclear deal, expire.
France has made it a diplomatic priority to constrain Iran’s nuclear ambitions in a verifiable and lasting manner. Yet the path forward is increasingly unclear. The United States under President Donald Trump has reimposed the “maximum pressure” campaign, while offering to negotiate a new deal. Iran, in response, has refused direct talks unless sanctions are lifted first.
Mixed Messages From Tehran and Washington
Conflicting signals have emerged from both capitals. While Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if no agreement is reached, he claimed on April 3 that Tehran may be reconsidering its position. But Tehran remains firm: it will not engage in direct negotiations while the pressure campaign continues.
Meanwhile, the US Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has taken a harder line, calling for the “full dismantlement” of Iran’s nuclear program. Experts argue that such demands, paired with growing military posturing, could force Iran’s hand.
Fabian Hinz, a researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, told RFE/RL’s Radio Farda that Iran appears to be preparing for the worst. “Recent drills and the unveiling of missile bases indicate that Tehran sees military threats as credible,” Hinz said. However, he also cautioned that even a successful military strike would only “buy time,” since “knowledge can’t be bombed.”
Growing Domestic Strains and Cyber Tensions
Inside Iran, mounting economic and political tensions are adding to the volatility. The rial has plunged to a record low – now trading at more than 1 million to the US dollar – a staggering drop from its 2015 exchange rate of 32,000 to the dollar. The collapse comes as markets reopened after Nowruz, the Persian New Year, with shops scrambling to adjust to inflation.
The economic misery has fueled frustration, particularly after last week’s alleged cyberattack on Iran’s Sepah Bank by the hacker group Codebreakers. The group claims to have exposed data from 42 million customer accounts, including members of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). While Sepah Bank denies any breach, insisting its systems are “unhackable,” the alleged leak has stirred outrage online over cyber vulnerabilities and elite privilege.
“This is a slap in the face of the Iranian people who are struggling daily to put bread on the table, while the powerful live untouched,” one Tehran-based tech analyst said anonymously for fear of reprisal.
Dissident Voices and Public Backlash
Public discontent is not only economic. Iranian sociologist Mostafa Mehraeen has attracted attention for his bold criticism of Supreme Leader Khamenei. In two open letters, Mehraeen called on Khamenei to acknowledge past mistakes, apologise, and resign – a rare and dangerous public act in Iran’s tightly controlled political landscape.
Mehraeen has since faced legal action and a court summons. Still, he stands by his words, telling Radio Farda in an interview that the resilience of Iranian society inspired his courage. “The strength of our people is the only thing that keeps hope alive,” he said.
The political climate is growing more brittle for Iran’s reformist President Masud Pezeshkian, who was elected in 2024 with hopes of repairing relations with the West. But as the economy falters under sanctions and nuclear tensions rise, even moderate voices risk being drowned out.
“An angry and hungry society can take to the streets at any moment,” warned Saeed Peyvandi, a sociology professor at Paris 13 University. “This economic deterioration closes the window for peaceful change.”
Allies Weigh In – And Choose Sides
On the diplomatic front, alliances are hardening. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visiting Washington this weekend to meet with Trump and discuss Iran, trade tariffs, and the International Criminal Court. The visit underscores the alignment between the two leaders on taking a hard line against Tehran.
Netanyahu’s office said the trip, his second since Trump began his second term in January, will focus heavily on “the Iranian threat.” Trump’s reinstatement of “maximum pressure” on February 4, including curbs on oil exports, has played well with Israeli hawks.
Back in Washington, a US House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing revealed rare bipartisan agreement: stopping Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is a top national security goal. But lawmakers remain divided on how to achieve it.
Republicans back Trump’s hardline approach. “The maximum pressure campaign devastated Iran’s economy and denied it critical resources. A nuclear Iran is not an option,” said Republican Representative Mike Lawler.
Democrats, while acknowledging the threat, continue to advocate for diplomacy. Norman Roule, a senior advisor at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, warned during the hearing that Iran could be months away from a nuclear weapon. “Military strikes could delay the program but not end it,” he said, advocating a combined strategy of diplomacy, readiness, and sanctions.
Choosing Between Friend and Foe
In his remarks, Larijani put the ball in Washington’s court. “The United States can either approach Iran as an economic partner or treat it as an enemy,” he said. “If they choose war, the consequences will not be limited to our borders.”
Inside Iran, there’s little consensus. Reformist analyst Ahmad Zeidabadi criticised Tehran’s bombastic rhetoric, saying it only strengthens the case for US or Israeli intervention. Culture Minister Abbas Salehi insisted that Khamenei’s fatwa against nuclear weapons is “religiously rooted” and non-negotiable.
Yet with the expiration of the 2015 nuclear deal looming and no alternative in sight, the risk of escalation is growing by the day. Trump’s threats, Israeli pressure, and Iran’s internal struggles are converging into a combustible mix — one that could erupt with a single miscalculation.
As Roule noted, “We are closer than ever to a nuclear Iran. And perhaps closer than ever to war.”
Image: By ChatGPT
