More

    Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Reform Charm Offensive

    Civil societySri Lanka’s Human Rights Reform Charm Offensive
    - Advertisment -

    Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Reform Charm Offensive

    On 22 March 2022, Sri Lankan lawmakers have approved a range of reforms to the country’s controversial anti-terror law. Activist groups, some Western governments and international bodies continue to press the current government to improve its human rights record amid a worsening domestic economic crisis.

    By Amresh Lavan Gunasingham

    The Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) was modified to allow suspects to challenge their detention in court and to expedite hearings to reduce the length of pre-trial detention periods. Rights groups allege that the law has been used over the past four decades to arbitrarily arrest and detain individuals for years without due process and to extract confessions through torture. Sri Lankan authorities have denied these claims.

    First enacted in 1979, successive administrations dominated by the Sinhalese majority have used the law to arrest minority Tamils linked to the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) group during the country’s prolonged civil war, which ended in 2009. More than a decade on, the act has been maintained in order to target dissidents, scores of individuals from the ethnic Tamil and Muslim minorities, and civil society activists. Following the 2019 Easter attacks, members of the Muslim community were also subjected to targeted attacks and discriminatory policies.

    - Advertisement -

    Sri Lanka has been on a diplomatic charm offensive in recent weeks to win international support for reforms to its anti-terror law. Sri Lanka’s human rights record drew scrutiny at a recent session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva. Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister GL Peiris defended the revisions to the PTA as an initial step to bring it in line with international norms and practices.

    Ethno-religious nationalism

    Several detainees have also been released in recent months, including the prominent lawyer Hejaz Hizbullah. But nearly 300 individuals continue to be detained under the PTA — some for over a decade — without charge or access to legal recourse.

    Opposition lawmakers and activists say the proposed reforms to the law do not go far enough. Some have called for it to be repealed altogether, arguing that the PTA still allows for the arbitrary arrest of suspects and the use of confessions obtained through torture as evidence in court. Observers have also questioned the necessity of the law, citing alternative laws that the government can use to tackle security threats.

    In a February report, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights observed that several individuals have been subjected to arbitrary detention, torture and enforced disappearances. The continued fostering of militarisation and ethno-religious nationalism by the state also undermines ‘democratic institutions, increases the anxiety of minorities, and impedes reconciliation’.

    In response, Sri Lanka has repeatedly claimed it will address grievances through its own domestic mechanisms. Government officials also point to measures already taken such as rehabilitating former Tamil Tiger rebels and the activation of an office to determine the status of those still missing from the civil war. Critics say little has come of such initiatives.

    European Union

    While previously rejecting attempts by the UN and global rights groups to repeal the PTA and address allegations of past rights abuses, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) led coalition has since softened its stance as it seeks to shore up trade ties with the European Union amid the country’s worsening economic and debt crisis.

    The EU has threatened to withdraw Sri Lanka’s access to the lucrative Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+) — a system of tariff-free access accorded to developing countries — if it does not improve its human rights record. As the island state’s garment industry exported over US$2 billion in goods to the EU in 2020, the loss of the GSP+ would represent a significant political and economic setback.

    Politics and economy

    In recent months, the country has been tormented by chronic food shortages and soaring inflation. Several regions have faced hours-long electricity blackouts due to the lack of foreign exchange currency to pay for fuel imports. Amid its worst economic crisis in decades, anti-government protests have roiled the country in recent weeks, with tens of thousands of people led by supporters of the opposition party United People’s Force demanding the resignation of President Rajapaksa and his elder brother Mahinda Rajapakse. The latter is currently the country’s prime minister.

    Efforts in the past to repeal or reform the PTA have failed amid resistance from parts of the Sinhala-Buddhist majority and the powerful security establishment. Security officials maintain that strong laws are still needed to prevent and prosecute future terrorist attacks in Sri Lanka inspired by the so-called Islamic State (IS). According to the 2022 Global Terrorism Index, the South Asian region remains vulnerable to potential IS-linked attacks — a threat starkly highlighted by the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks.

    While the organisational capabilities and operational sophistication of regional terrorist groups remain potent and will need to be effectively countered, the government should still consider committing to further reforms of aspects of the PTA that are susceptible to abuse, including long-term detentions and incidents of torture.

    This could also go some way towards addressing the country’s long standing ethno-nationalist cleavages, even as a comprehensive reconciliation and accountability process remains elusive to heal the wounds of its 26 year-long civil war.

     

    Amresh Lavan Gunasingham is Associate Editor at the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR) at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore.

     

    This piece has been sourced from the East Asia Forum of the Australian National University.

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    UN Trade Body Urges US to Exempt Vulnerable Economies from Tariff Hikes amid Rising Trade Tensions

    Despite their marginal impact, many of these countries could face tariff rates as high as 50 per cent, such as Lesotho, while Cameroon could face 11 per cent.

    Countries Finalise Historic Pandemic Agreement After Three Years of Negotiations

    The text affirms national sovereignty in public health decisions. It states explicitly that nothing in the agreement gives WHO the authority to mandate health measures such as lockdowns, vaccination campaigns, or border closures.

    While India’s RAMSAR Sites Tally Rises, Wetlands Remain Endangered

    Conservationists, activists, and newspaper editorials in India have long been expressing concerns about the “decline” and “neglect” of wetland ecosystems across India.

    Bangladesh, Pakistan Resume High-Level Talks After 15 Years Amid Signs of Thaw in Ties

    As both sides prepare for Deputy Prime Minister Dar’s visit later this month, expectations are rising for further breakthroughs – not only in diplomatic symbolism but in real policy shifts that could redefine South Asia’s often turbulent regional dynamics.
    - Advertisement -

    UN Forum Tackles Slavery Reparations for Africa, People of African Descent

    The United Nations has acknowledged that slavery and the transatlantic slave trade were crimes against humanity and has called for remedial action.

    Is it Time to Say RIP to the SDGs?

    When he was elected for a second term, President Donald Trump promised extraordinary, history-making change. Whether you support his world view or not, no one can deny he has been true to his word. The previous multilateral consensus is shattered.

    Must read

    UN Trade Body Urges US to Exempt Vulnerable Economies from Tariff Hikes amid Rising Trade Tensions

    Despite their marginal impact, many of these countries could face tariff rates as high as 50 per cent, such as Lesotho, while Cameroon could face 11 per cent.

    Countries Finalise Historic Pandemic Agreement After Three Years of Negotiations

    The text affirms national sovereignty in public health decisions. It states explicitly that nothing in the agreement gives WHO the authority to mandate health measures such as lockdowns, vaccination campaigns, or border closures.
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you