More

    Sri Lanka’s Economic Crisis Cripples Health Services

    Until 2021 the country had a strong healthcare sector, but today, Sri Lanka has run out of hard currency to buy basic medicines. Medical practitioners in the country are now appealing for donations to support the healthcare system, which has been heavily affected by the current economic crisis.

    By Sanjeet Bagcchi

    Sri Lanka’s acute economic crisis has begun to tell on its health care system with critical medicines running out for want of hard currency to import supplies, experts say.

    “The limited access to US dollars, import regulations and fuel shortages have stalled supply chains and distribution systems so that the health ministry may not be able to order regular medicines and items needed to supply all the hospitals and service providers as during normal times,” says Kumari Vinodhani Navaratne, a Colombo-based public health specialist formerly affiliated with the World Bank and currently with the Asian Development Bank.

    Navaratne tells SciDev.Net that serious shortages of critical items needed to maintain health services are worrying health care providers and those who need health services. She said that owing to Sri Lanka’s current economic crisis, routine non-emergency surgeries, medical procedures and some laboratory tests have been placed on hold to conserve stocks.

    The Ministry of Health procures, stores and distributes all required medicines, vaccines, consumables, reagents and commodities to all hospitals managed by the government, Navaratne explains.

    Appealing for aid

    An international appeal by the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) asks for “generous support at this crucial time to continue the patient care services in Sri Lanka”. The GMOA says it has undertaken to ensure “transparent coordination and direction of your donations of medicines and equipment to hospitals for the patient care within the quality assurance mechanism for drugs and equipment of the Ministry of Health”.

    The GMOA has published a list of items such as antibiotics and consumables that are running out and can be replenished by donations.

    A UK government travel advice warns that “basic necessities” such as medicines, food and fuel are in short supply due to lack of hard currency required to pay for imports. “There may be long queues at grocery stores, gas stations, and pharmacies. Local authorities may impose the rationing of electricity, resulting in power outages,” the advice says.

    The travel advice also warns about dengue fever, possible terrorist activities and monsoon rains. Dengue fever has long been endemic in Sri Lanka.

    Sad turn of events

    According to the World Bank, Sri Lanka faces unsustainable debt and challenges with balance of payments (the difference in value between payments into and out of a country). “Urgent policy measures are needed to address the high levels of debt and debt service, reduce the fiscal deficit, restore external stability, and mitigate the adverse impacts on the poor and vulnerable.”

    Until last year, Sri Lanka’s health care system was considered “strong” by the WHO-hosted Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. A country with a population of 21.8 million people, Sri Lanka has eliminated important infectious diseases such as neonatal tetanus, malaria, and filariasis while also substantially increasing life expectancy.

    In July 2021, the WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia said that the public sector in Sri Lanka provided most of the health care services including inpatient care (95 per cent) and outpatient care (50 per cent) at public health facilities. Government expenditure in Sri Lankan health care as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) was 1.7 per cent during 2013—2016.

    According to the WHO, the “[household] contribution to current health expenditure is significant, but catastrophic health expenditure remains low as the government remains a key provider of inpatient care. Medication and investigations are provided free of charge”.

    To improve Sri Lanka’s healthcare situation, Navaratne recommends that the supply chain be restored through the award of tenders for essential items. “This requires urgent and immediate access to US dollar resources, as most required items [related to health care] are imported.”

     

    Image: A pharmacy in Sri Lanka from Direct Relief (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

    Will 2022 Mark A Turning Point In The Regulation Or Banning of Bottom Trawling?

    Whilst it is known that bottom trawling harms the seabed, that it does not target the species it catches and is a major consumer of fuel, scientists are also now warning about its impact on the climate.

    By Annick Berger

    A growing number of voices are calling for an end to what has been described as ‘the worst fishing technique in the world’, bottom trawling. They are also calling for a profound transformation of this sector, even though around a quarter of the fish consumed in the world are caught using this method, which causes serious damage to the seabed.

    To provide a solid foundation for regulating the practice, some 40 scientists, NGOs, academics and environmental consultants joined forces to produce a report, New perspectives on an old fishing practice: Scale, context and impacts of bottom trawling, published in December 2021.

    The study comes at a time when the European Union is developing its Action Plan to Conserve Fisheries Resources and Protect Marine Ecosystems and the United Nations has declared 2022 as the International Year of Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture.

    “Unlike other fishing practices, it’s very diverse in terms of what we use it for,” Daniel Steadman, one of the report authors and former fisheries and biodiversity technical specialist at the environmental NGO Fauna & Flora International, tells Equal Times. “We use it for high value species, such as cod or plaice, and for relatively low value species that we still eat, such as shrimp. We also use it for very low value species that are processed to feed farm animals.”

    Whilst it is known that trawling harms the seabed, that it does not target the species it catches and is a major consumer of fuel, scientists are also now warning about its impact on the climate. “Recent studies show that bottom trawling releases carbon into the atmosphere and the oceans,” Steve Trent, CEO of the Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF), tells Equal Times.

    ‘Triple bottom line’ 

    Several reports published by NGOs such as Oceana have already shown the effects of this practice on the populations of the countries where it is most widespread. Accordingly, the document published in December reaffirms that the environmental and social issues are closely linked and must be addressed in tandem to find a sustainable solution.

    “When scientists think about the damage, they think about it in three ways, the so-called triple bottom line: the environmental damage and the social damage offset by the economic benefit,” Dr. Steve Rocliffe, senior technical advisor at Blue Ventures, tells Equal Times.

    And the social impact is worrying, especially when long-distance fleets operate, legally or illegally, in waters other than their own, as bottom trawling is often carried out less than 12 miles from the shore, where boats make 20 per cent of their catches, putting the industry’s heavyweights in direct competition with small-scale fishers whose survival often depends on the resources caught at sea. This is particularly evident off the coast of Africa, which is the number one victim of bottom trawling: over 90 per cent of legal catches are made in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of 34 countries by foreign vessels, particularly those from China or Vietnam, but also from countries such as Morocco, the United States or Argentina.

    These fishing giants wreak havoc on the areas where they operate. The taxes paid to the countries that own the waters where they fish are often negligible.

    “Bottom trawling has a huge social cost,” Daniel Pauly, the specialist behind the Sea Around Us programme at the University of British Columbia, in Canada, tells Equal Times. “Only the Senegalese should be allowed to fish in Senegalese waters, not Spaniards, Russians or Chinese.”

    This unequivocal stance is not shared by everyone. Although the cost to small-scale fishers is incontestable – 100 million people rely on inshore subsistence and small-scale artisanal fishing for their daily food and livelihood – an abrupt halt to bottom trawling without careful analysis could, in the short term, generate a degree of global food insecurity by depriving farmers of very affordable fishmeal to feed their livestock and depriving the poor of a cheap and widely available source of nutrition. “It’s an ongoing debate,” says Rocliffe. “But clearly, in the long run, if you destroy fisheries you make food insecurity worse.”

    Inshore exclusion zones

    The economic stakes are partly to blame for the lack of progress in regulating the practice. In a bid to find solutions, the Transform Bottom Trawling Coalition, which brings together small-scale fishers, seafood companies, environmentalists and scientists, has launched a four point call to action to try to limit the environmental and social impacts of bottom trawling.

    The coalition is calling on all coastal states to establish, expand and strengthen inshore exclusion zones (IEZs), where all bottom trawling is banned and only small-scale fishers have exclusive access. “Conflicts emerge when bottom trawlers and small-scale fishers operate in the same area,” says Tom Collinson of the Transform Bottom Trawling Coalition.

    Testimonies collected in Liberia and Senegal illustrate the problems that can arise between small-scale fishers and large trawlers, such as collisions.

    Solutions are already being explored in various countries to strengthen IEZs, such as in Guinea Bissau, where the exclusion zone has been extended to 12 miles from the coast, and in Liberia, which already banned trawlers from operating within three miles of its coast in 2010.

    The Transform Bottom Trawling Coalition is also calling on international bodies to ban all bottom trawling in marine protected areas (which are not protected against bottom trawling) and to expand their size.

    Its third demand is for an end to subsidies for bottom trawling and the redeployment of this money to support the transition to low impact fishing methods. The industry’s survival is largely dependent on state subsidies in the form of fuel tax exemptions and motorization subsidies. The United Nations has been officially calling for a ban on these subsidies since 2015, as the practice encourages overfishing, IUU (illegal, unreported and unregulated) fishing and associated abuses such as forced labour. “If you take away the money, you take away the problem,” says Rocliffe, as it would prevent, for example, a French boat from fishing off Liberia, given that the practice would no longer be profitable. Finally, the coalition is also calling for a freeze on permits for all new, untrawled areas.

    The Transform Bottom Trawling Coalition is urging “all coastal states to tackle bottom trawling by 2030 and to implement these four demands,” says Collinson. “We recognise that ending bottom trawling is extremely complex and nuanced. We are not therefore calling for an immediate ban on bottom trawling, but for a fair transition to low impact methods.”

    Time for action

    “If we want a real transformation and transition of this sector, in the long term, we have to make sure it is fair,” says Steadman. “We need to consider not only the rights of the people who are affected by the practice, but also the rights of the people who work in the industry. That’s why we’re comparing this transition with the fossil fuel transition, the economic shift is the same.”

    These suggested solutions and lines of thought could be taken up by world leaders this year, at the UN Ocean Conference, for example, to be held in Portugal in June 2022. But for now, beyond the lofty statements, no concrete measures have yet been taken. “We need to see action taken at government level,” says Collinson.

    Not everyone is convinced by this approach, and many NGOs and scientists are still campaigning for a total ban on bottom trawling. “It is impossible to improve this practice,” says Daniel Pauly from the University of British Columbia. Trent of the EFJ agrees. “Low-cost fish are actually the most expensive, because they lead to the destruction of fishing grounds,” he argues. “If we continue like this, we will not be able to feed the growing number of people on our planet, we will not be able to maintain the integrity of our ocean ecosystems.” Pauly concludes: “If bottom trawling were introduced today, it would never be allowed. The only reason it is tolerated is because it was introduced 200 years ago.”

     

    This piece has been sourced from Equal Times

    An Angel’s Kiss in Spring: Imran Khan, wife paid 38 million to retain foreign gifts worth crores

    A new set of documents obtained by OWSA reveal that former Pakistan Prime Minister, Imran Khan, and his spouse, Bushra Bibi, have retained gifts the former received as head of government against a paltry sum.

    Former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi have retained all the 112 valuables worth Rs 142.02 million gifted by other countries, either for free or purchasing at throwaway prices of Rs 38 million, a set of documents obtained by OWSA reveal.

    According to the documents, Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi retained 52 of the gifts worth Rs 800,200 without paying a penny.

    Toshakhana, a department reporting to the government’s cabinet division maintains the record of the gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, and officials by heads of other governments, states, and foreign dignitaries as a goodwill gesture.

    The list of Toshakhana gifts received by Khan during the time he occupied office of Pakistan’s Prime Minister remained a secret throughout his tenure. Even the country’s tax authorities did not have a clue of the gifts he received from foreign dignitaries or visiting business persons.

    Khan’s government had adopted the stance that the disclosure of any information related to Toshakhana would jeopardise international ties.

    The list of gifts shows that the other valuables were kept by the couple after paying throwaway amounts. In a number of instances, the assessed values of these gifts were many times higher.

    Watches. Perfumes.

    The gifts include luxurious Rolex and other expensive watches, gold and diamond jewellery, expensive pens, cufflinks, dinner sets, perfumes, and Oud fragrance.

    Among the jewellery were a multiple number of necklaces, bracelets, rings and diamond chains that Bushra Bibi retained.

    Among the watches was a Graff wristwatch worth about Pakistani Rs 85 million that was presented to Khan by Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman during Khan’s very first visit to the Kingdom. Khan paid a mere Rs 20 million for this.

    There were also gifts of lesser worth that the former Prime Minister chose to retain. These include an IPhone, suits, wallets, pens and perfumes.

    A Rolex watch that Khan retained has been estimated by the Toshakhana to be worth Pakistani Rs. 900,000. Another Rolex watch was worth Rs 400,000. An IPhone was estimated to cost Rs. 210,000. A Dolce & Gabba perfume was said to be worth Rs. 35000 and two Bvlgari perfumes cost around Rs. 30,000 and Rs. 26,000. A Rubi perfume is estimated to cost Rs. 40,000. A Samsonite wallet cost has been put at Rs. 6,000 and another Aigner ladies wallet is said to cost Rs. 18,000. Similarly, a Mont Blanc pen was worth Rs. 28,000.

    The Khans retained all of these against a payment of Pakistani Rs. 3,38,600.

    Similarly a Graff watch valued at Rs. 85,000,000 and a pair of cuff links valued at Rs. 5.67 million and a ring worth Rs. 8.75 million was retained against a payment of a mere Rs 20 lakhs.

    Perfumes have been of interest: Two kilos of oud worth Rs 200,000 and two bottles of Attar Rs 180,000 along with a Tasbeeh (Mouward) worth Rs. 130,000 now belong to Khan who pain a mere Rs. 240,000 for these.

    Spoils of office?

    Jewellery too has been Bushra Bibi’s obsession – the impression the couple have given of her is one who has devoted her lift to spiritual quests and serving the needy.

    But being the spouse of the country’s prime minister seems to have given her a taste for things lavish – a diamond locket with a gold chain worth Rs. 269,350; a pair of gold ear tops studded with diamonds worth Rs. 111,800, two gold and diamond rings worth Rs. 149,400 and Rs. 272,350 each; two gold bracelets worth Rs. 235,500 were all acquired for her for just Pakistani Rs. 544,000 on 11 October 2019.

    Another document shows that Bushra Bibi also received a necklace worth Rs. 1,359,000 and earrings worth Rs. 275,000 besides a ring worth Rs. 225,000 and a bracelet worth Rs. 4,000,000. She retained all of these against a payment of Rs. 29 lakhs.

    The long list also includes expensive dinner sets, an Onyx bowl, luxurious chessboards, wall hangings, decorations, carpets, flower vases, Lankan gemstones, expensive rosaries or Tasbeeh and a model door of the holy Khana Kaaba, besides robes and clothes.

    Nepal Unveils Its First Electric Vehicle

    The preliminary version of the eco-friendly two-wheeler was launched on Thursday. The scooter’s electric battery can sustain its run for 50 kilometres upon a complete charging.

    The Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST) today unveiled the country’s first ever indigenously developed vehicle.

    The vehicle, an electric scooter, has been developed in collaboration with the provincial government of the Lumbini Province.

    The preliminary version of the eco-friendly two-wheeler was launched on Thursday by Nepal’s Minister for Energy, Water Resources and Irrigation, Pampha Bhusal.

    The scooter’s electric battery can sustain its run for 50 kilometres upon a complete charging. This also means that there will have to be enough charging stations to promote the use of electric vehicles in the country. The Nepal Electricity Authority has undertaken the construction of 50 charging stations across the country.

    Named ‘Sarathi’, the design of the prototype cost NAST a mere Nepali Rs 300,000.

    The development is viewed as significant for the country that has been dependent on importing vehicles from its two rather industrialised neighbours – India and China – and from elsewhere in the world.

    Besides, the electric scooter is also welcome in a hydro-electricity rich country that would like to save its foreign expenditures on fossil fuels.

    The development is also appropriate, given Nepal’s road system and its geography.

    Another EV launch

    Nepal’s quest for electric vehicles got another push today with the country’s biggest business house, the Chaudhary Group, announcing its foray into electric vehicles.

    In a tweet posted today, the group’s managing director, Nirvana Chaudhary announced the establishment of CG Motors with the tagline ‘Join The Revolution’, announcing the “world’s most anticipated EV – coming to Nepal”.

    The tweet does not reveal any information about the upcoming EV brand. But it is believed that CG Motors will introduce Neta (Nezha), the EV brand owned by the Chinese all-electric car company, Hozon Auto owned by the Zhejiang Hezhong New Energy Automobile Company.

    Homegrown technology

    At the announcement of the NAST electric scooter, Minister Bhusal asked NAST to advise the government on whether the country needs to introduce internationally available technology or to develop a homegrown technology for the automotive industry. She also urged NAST to explore whether or not power storage was possible, given the country predicament in winters when hydroelectric production drops.

    NAST Vice-Chancellor Sunil Babu Shrestha said, with some pride, that the innovation would silence doubters who felt that the country’s academics failed to deliver research-based results.

    According to Shrestha, the achievement paves the way for commercial production of electric scooters in Nepal.

    The Nepali innovation is a nascent one – electric vehicle covering 1,000 kilometres on a single full charge are now a norm and Nepal’s immediate neighbours, India and China are miles ahead in the manufacturing of electric vehicles. Besides, Nepal has been a market for automobiles from these two neighbours.

    WHO Recommends Successful COVID-19 Therapy; Calls For Wide Geographical Distribution and Transparency from Originator

    In a news release to the media, the WHO has strongly recommended antiviral drugs for patients with non-severe COVID-19. It says that the combination of drugs nirmatrelvir and ritonavir works for patients at highest risk of hospital admission.

    Today, the World Health Organisation (WHO) made a strong recommendation for nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, sold under the name Paxlovid, for mild and moderate COVID-19 patients at highest risk of hospital admissions, calling it the best therapeutic choice for high-risk patients to date.

    However, availability, lack of price transparency in bilateral deals made by the producer, and the need for prompt and accurate testing before administering it, are turning this life-saving medicine into a major challenge for low- and middle-income countries.

    Pfizer’s oral antiviral drug (a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir tablets) is “strongly recommended for patients with non-severe COVID-19 who are at highest risk of developing severe disease and hospitalization, such as unvaccinated, older, or immunosuppressed patients,” the WHO release said.

    This recommendation is based on new data from two randomized controlled trials involving 3078 patients. The data show that the risk of hospitalization is reduced by 85 per cent following this treatment. In a high-risk group (over 10 per cent risk of hospitalization), that means 84 fewer hospitalizations per 1000 patients.

    WHO suggests against its use in patients at lower risk, as the benefits were found to be negligible.

    Low testing capacities

    One obstacle for low- and middle-income countries is that the medicine can only be administered while the disease is at its early stages; prompt and accurate testing is therefore essential for a successful outcome with this therapy. Data collected by FIND show that the average daily testing rate in low-income countries is as low as one-eightieth the rate in high-income countries. Improving access to early testing and diagnosis in primary health care settings will be key for the global rollout of this treatment.

    WHO is extremely concerned that — as occurred with COVID-19 vaccines — low- and middle-income countries will again be pushed to the end of the queue when it comes to accessing this treatment.

    Lack of transparency on the part of the originator company is making it difficult for public health organizations to obtain an accurate picture of the availability of the medicine, which countries are involved in bilateral deals and what they are paying. In addition, a licensing agreement made by Pfizer with the Medicines Patent Pool limits the number of countries that can benefit from generic production of the medicine.

    The originator product, sold under the name Paxlovid, will be included in the WHO pre-qualification list  today, but generic products are not yet available from quality-assured sources. Several generic companies (many of which are covered by the licensing agreement between the Medicines Pool and Pfizer) are in discussion with WHO. But they also say that pre-qualification may take some time to comply with international standards so that they can supply the medicine internationally.

    Transparent pricing

    For these reasons, WHO has strongly recommended that Pfizer make its pricing and deals more transparent and that it enlarge the geographical scope of its licence with the Medicines Patent Pool so that more generic manufacturers may start to produce the medicine and make it available faster at affordable prices.

    Along with the strong recommendation for the use of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, WHO has also updated its recommendation on remdesivir, another antiviral medicine.

    Previously, WHO had suggested against its use in all COVID-19 patients regardless of disease severity, due to the totality of the evidence at that time showing little or no effect on mortality. Following publication of new data from a clinical trial looking at the outcome of admission to hospital, WHO has updated its recommendation. WHO now suggests the use of remdesivir in mild or moderate COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of hospitalization.

    The recommendation for use of remdesivir in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 is currently under review, the WHO news release said.

    MIT Empowering People To Adapt On The Frontlines Of Climate Change

    A new platform will unite climate models, impact predictions, random control trial evaluations, and humanitarian services to bring cutting-edge tools to Bangladeshi communities.

    Kylie Foy   |   MIT Lincoln Laboratory

    On April 11, MIT announced five multiyear flagship projects in the first-ever Climate Grand Challenges, a new initiative to tackle complex climate problems and deliver breakthrough solutions to the world as quickly as possible. This article is the fifth in a five-part series highlighting the most promising concepts to emerge from the competition and the interdisciplinary research teams behind them.

    In the coastal south of Bangladesh, rice paddies that farmers could once harvest three times a year lie barren. Sea-level rise brings saltwater to the soil, ruining the staple crop. It’s one of many impacts, and inequities, of climate change. Despite producing less than 1 per cent of global carbon emissions, Bangladesh is suffering more than most countries. Rising seas, heat waves, flooding, and cyclones threaten 90 million people.

    A platform being developed in a collaboration between MIT and BRAC, a Bangladesh-based global development organization, aims to inform and empower climate-threatened communities to proactively adapt to a changing future. Selected as one of five MIT Climate Grand Challenges flagship projects, the Climate Resilience Early Warning System (CREWSnet) will forecast the local impacts of climate change on people’s lives, homes, and livelihoods. These forecasts will guide BRAC’s development of climate-resiliency programs to help residents prepare for and adapt to life-altering conditions.

    “The communities that CREWSnet will focus on have done little to contribute to the problem of climate change in the first place. However, because of socioeconomic situations, they may be among the most vulnerable. We hope that by providing state-of-the-art projections and sharing them broadly with communities, and working through partners like BRAC, we can help improve the capacity of local communities to adapt to climate change, significantly,” says Elfatih Eltahir, the H.M. King Bhumibol Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

    Eltahir leads the project with John Aldridge and Deborah Campbell in the Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief Systems Group at Lincoln Laboratory. Additional partners across MIT include the Center for Global Change Science; the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences; the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change; and the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.

    Predicting local risks

    CREWSnet’s forecasts rely upon a sophisticated model, developed in Eltahir’s research group over the past 25 years, called the MIT Regional Climate Model. This model zooms in on climate processes at local scales, at a resolution as granular as 6 miles. In Bangladesh’s population-dense cities, a 6-mile area could encompass tens, or even hundreds, of thousands of people. The model takes into account the details of a region’s topography, land use, and coastline to predict changes in local conditions.

    When applying this model over Bangladesh, researchers found that heat waves will get more severe and more frequent over the next 30 years. In particular, wet-bulb temperatures, which indicate the ability for humans to cool down by sweating, will rise to dangerous levels rarely observed today, particularly in western, inland cities.

    Such hot spots exacerbate other challenges predicted to worsen near Bangladesh’s coast. Rising sea levels and powerful cyclones are eroding and flooding coastal communities, causing saltwater to surge into land and freshwater. This salinity intrusion is detrimental to human health, ruins drinking water supplies, and harms crops, livestock, and aquatic life that farmers and fishermen depend on for food and income.

    CREWSnet will fuse climate science with forecasting tools that predict the social and economic impacts to villages and cities. These forecasts — such as how often a crop season may fail, or how far floodwaters will reach — can steer decision-making.

    “What people need to know, whether they’re a governor or head of a household, is ‘What is going to happen in my area, and what decisions should I make for the people I’m responsible for?’ Our role is to integrate this science and technology together into a decision support system,” says Aldridge, whose group at Lincoln Laboratory specializes in this area. Most recently, they transitioned a hurricane-evacuation planning system to the U.S. government. “We know that making decisions based on climate change requires a deep level of trust. That’s why having a powerful partner like BRAC is so important,” he says.

    Testing interventions

    Established 50 years ago, just after Bangladesh’s independence, BRAC works in every district of the nation to provide social services that help people rise from extreme poverty. Today, it is one of the world’s largest nongovernmental organizations, serving 110 million people across 11 countries in Asia and Africa, but its success is cultivated locally.

    “BRAC is thrilled to partner with leading researchers at MIT to increase climate resilience in Bangladesh and provide a model that can be scaled around the globe,” says Donella Rapier, president and CEO of BRAC USA. “Locally led climate adaptation solutions that are developed in partnership with communities are urgently needed, particularly in the most vulnerable regions that are on the frontlines of climate change.”

    CREWSnet will help BRAC identify communities most vulnerable to forecasted impacts. In these areas, they will share knowledge and innovate or bolster programs to improve households’ capacity to adapt.

    Many climate initiatives are already underway. One program equips homes to filter and store rainwater, as salinity intrusion makes safe drinking water hard to access. Another program is building resilient housing, able to withstand 120-mile-per-hour winds, that can double as local shelters during cyclones and flooding. Other services are helping farmers switch to different livestock or crops better suited for wetter or saltier conditions (e.g., ducks instead of chickens, or salt-tolerant rice), providing interest-free loans to enable this change.

    But adapting in place will not always be possible, for example in areas predicted to be submerged or unbearably hot by midcentury. “Bangladesh is working on identifying and developing climate-resilient cities and towns across the country, as closer-by alternative destinations as compared to moving to Dhaka, the overcrowded capital of Bangladesh,” says Campbell. “CREWSnet can help identify regions better suited for migration, and climate-resilient adaptation strategies for those regions.” At the same time, BRAC’s Climate Bridge Fund is helping to prepare cities for climate-induced migration, building up infrastructure and financial services for people who have been displaced.

    Evaluating impact

    While CREWSnet’s goal is to enable action, it can’t quite measure the impact of those actions. The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), a development economics program in the MIT School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, will help evaluate the effectiveness of the climate-adaptation programs.

    “We conduct randomized controlled trials, similar to medical trials, that help us understand if a program improved people’s lives,” says Claire Walsh, the project director of the King Climate Action Initiative at J-PAL. “Once CREWSnet helps BRAC implement adaptation programs, we will generate scientific evidence on their impacts, so that BRAC and CREWSnet can make a case to funders and governments to expand effective programs.”

    The team aspires to bring CREWSnet to other nations disproportionately impacted by climate change. “Our vision is to have this be a globally extensible capability,” says Campbell. CREWSnet’s name evokes another early-warning decision-support system, FEWSnet, that helped organizations address famine in eastern Africa in the 1980s. Today it is a pillar of food-security planning around the world.

    CREWSnet hopes for a similar impact in climate change planning. Its selection as an MIT Climate Grand Challenges flagship project will inject the project with more funding and resources, momentum that will also help BRAC’s fundraising. The team plans to deploy CREWSnet to southwestern Bangladesh within five years.

    “The communities that we are aspiring to reach with CREWSnet are deeply aware that their lives are changing — they have been looking climate change in the eye for many years. They are incredibly resilient, creative, and talented,” says Ashley Toombs, the external affairs director for BRAC USA. “As a team, we are excited to bring this system to Bangladesh. And what we learn together, we will apply at potentially even larger scales.”

     

    Reprinted with permission of MIT News (http://news.mit.edu/)

    Image: CREWSNET, MIT

     

    India’s Female Representation Bill Is Still Seated

    It has been 25 years since the Women’s Reservation Bill — a constitutional amendment proposing that 33 per cent of seats in India’s central and state assemblies be reserved for women — was first introduced to the Indian Parliament in 1996. The representation of women in different legislative bodies remains low across India.

    By Niharika Rustagi

    India ranks 148 out of 193 countries in the number of elected female representatives in parliament, with Afghanistan ranking 71st, Bangladesh 111th, Bhutan 145th, Nepal 47th and Pakistan 116th. While the global average for female representation in lower chambers or unicamerals is 25.8 per cent, India stands at 14.4 per cent. The 78 (out of 543 members) women elected to the lower chamber elected in 2019 is India’s highest proportion to date.

    Women make up 11.2 per cent, or 27 out of 241 members, of the upper chamber. But despite those dismal figures, the debate over the Bill has not featured prominently in national political discourse barring occasions like International Women’s Day.

    First introduced in 1996, the Bill aimed to reserve 33 per cent of state assembly and parliamentary seats for women. It also proposed allocating one third of the seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the lower chamber, Lok Sabha, and state assemblies, to women. The reserved seats would be allocated to different constituencies in Lok Sabha by rotation.

    The Bill was inspired by the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments in 1993. These amendments mandated that no less than one third of the total seats in local bodies be reserved for women. The Bill faced widespread opposition, with critics claiming it diverted attention from more pressing electoral reforms. Others argued it would reduce the incentive for MPs deemed ineligible for re-election to do constituency work. Some even questioned the merit of women merit entering through the seat reservation system.

    Under-utilised tool

    The Indian Constitution guarantees men and women equal ability to participate in elections. Gender-balanced cabinets are a crucial indicator of the commitment to achieving gender equality. There are also instrumental gains to be achieved through greater representation of women in decision making positions.

    The positive effect of female representation in local bodies can be seen across different domains.

    First, the gender gap in villages with leadership positions reserved for women was found to be smaller than in villages without seat reservations. Second, female political representation correlates positively with female reporting of crime. Third, villages with female leaders tend to receive greater investment in drinking water. Fourth, female presidents of village councils enable other women to secure greater property rights progress that is key to reducing gender inequality in Indian land ownership.

    But the positive impact of female political participation is not limited to villages. A United Nations University study found that female legislators raised the annual economic performance of their constituencies by 1.8 percentage points more than their male counterparts. The same study suggested that women legislators are less likely to exploit office for personal gain than their male counterparts.

    Female representation in state legislatures has also been associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality, suggesting that female political representation is an underutilised tool for addressing health problems.

    Gender Equality

    Despite the positive effects of female political representation, a lack of political will has made it difficult to pass the Bill after first being introduced in 1996. It was reintroduced in 1998, 1999 and 2008, but despite passing the upper house in 2010, it was never voted on in the lower house .The Bill finally lapsed following the dissolution of the lower house in 2014.

    During the rule of the United Progressive Alliance, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) opposition frequently accused the ruling Indian National Congress of getting cold feet over passing the Bill. But the tables have turned under the rule of the BJP, as they have fared no better in sponsoring gender equality.

    Current female representation in state assemblies is similarly poor, with the proportion of female candidates increasing by five to ten per cent in the last three decades. At this rate, there is still a long road ahead for equal representation in India’s legislative bodies

    The continued under representation of women, arising from severe discrimination against women in politics, is a reprehensible state of affairs for the world’s largest democracy. The lack of consensus among political parties regarding the contents of the Bill has hindered its passing, while the inadequate representation and participation of women casts doubt on the legitimacy of the policymaking process.

    Reserving enough parliamentary seats for women is necessary for India to achieve proper political representation and live up to the full spirit of democracy. While a seat reservation system is no panacea for the deeply rooted gender discrimination in Indian society, passing the Women’s Reservation Bill is still a step towards achieving gender equality.

     

    Niharika Rustagi is a Doctoral Candidate at the Lee Kuan Yew School Of Public Policy, National University of Singapore.

    This piece has been sourced from the East Asia Forum of the Australian National University.

    Image: Hippopx, licensed to use under Creative Commons Zero – CC0

    UN Recognizes Broadcaster Attenborough With Lifetime Achievement Award

    Attenborough, 95, is arguably the world’s best-known natural history broadcaster. During a career that began with the dawn of television, he has penned and presented some of the most influential documentaries on the state of the planet, including his decade-spanning, nine-part Life series.

    When Sir David Attenborough was a boy, he spent much of his free time bounding through abandoned quarries in the English countryside, hammer in hand. His prey: fossilized ammonites, spiral-shaped mollusks that lived in the time of the dinosaurs.

    To a young Attenborough, the fossils were like buried treasures and he was amazed to be the first to set eyes on them in tens of millions of years.

    The natural world would keep him enthralled for the rest of his life.

    Today, Attenborough, 95, is arguably the world’s best-known natural history broadcaster. During a career that began with the dawn of television, he has penned and presented some of the most influential documentaries on the state of the planet, including his decade-spanning, nine-part Life series.

    With what the New York Times called his “voice-of-God-narration” and an insatiable curiosity, he has spent 70 years revealing the beauty of the natural world – and laying bare the threats it faces. Along the way, he has offered hundreds of millions of viewers a vision for a more sustainable future.

    “If the world is, indeed, to be saved, then Attenborough will have had more to do with its salvation than anyone else who ever lived,” wrote environmentalist and author Simon Barnes.

    The United Nations has recognized Attenborough’s outsized impact on the global environmental movement, presenting him with the UN Champions of the Earth Lifetime Achievement Award. The award is the UN’s highest environmental honour and celebrates those who have dedicated their lives to tackling crises like climate change, species loss and pollution.

    Planet’s spokesperson

    “You have been an extraordinary inspiration for so many people,” said Inger Andersen, the Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), as she presented Attenborough with the award.

    “You spoke for the planet long before anyone else did and you continue to hold our feet to the fire.”

    Along with his work in the media, Attenborough is one of the leading voices of the global environmental movement. He has appeared at landmark summits, like the 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference, where he has called for a unified global effort to combat the threats to the Earth.

    He has also collaborated with UNEP for at least four decades, lending his voice to a series of campaigns and short films that have cast a spotlight on the organization’s efforts to counter the climate crisis, biodiversity loss and pollution. That work is driven by a belief that no one country alone can solve the planet’s environmental ills.

    “We are living in an era when nationalism simply isn’t enough,” Attenborough said in accepting the UNEP Champion of the Earth Lifetime Achievement Award. “We must feel like we are all citizens of this one planet. If we work together, we can solve these problems.”

    Attenborough graduated from Cambridge University in 1947 with a degree in natural sciences, but soon found he didn’t have the disposition for a life of research. And so, he made his way to the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) just as television was creeping into homes.

    His first TV appearance came on 21 December 1954, in Zoo Quest, a globe-trotting series that introduced rapt Britons to exotic creatures, like orangutans and Komodo dragons.

    Life on Earth

    As talented an administrator as he was a presenter, Attenborough would rise through the ranks of Britain’s national broadcaster, eventually coming to helm BBC Two. There, he commissioned Monty Python’s Flying Circus, among other series.

    But administration wasn’t really for him, and in 1973 Attenborough left the executive suite to return to making films.

    The result would be his landmark 1979 series Life on Earth, an epic that charted the history of the living world, from the first microbes to humankind.

    The series took three years to make and Attenborough travelled 1.5 million miles during filming. With its scope and ambition, Life on Earth would redefine the natural history documentary and be viewed by some 500 million people.

    Over the next three decades, Attenborough would write and present eight more grand documentaries, focusing the world’s attention on what he called the “spectacular marvel” of nature.

    But as his career progressed, Attenborough came to bear witness to the cratering of the natural world. As humanity’s presence grew, nature’s receded. Human activity has altered three-quarters of the Earth’s surface and placed 1 million species at risk of extinction.

    “Immensely powerful though we are today, it’s equally clear that we’re going to be even more powerful tomorrow,” he said at the conclusion of 1984’s The Living Planet. “Clearly we could devastate the world. [The Earth’s] continued survival now rests in our hands.”

    Attenborough’s films showed the world that the wild is not infinite, that it was delicate and needed protecting – and that humanity was growing dangerously apart from nature.

    Optimist

    Last year, halfway through his 90s, he addressed world leaders at the UN Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, Scotland.

    “We are already in trouble,” he said. “Is this how our story is to end? A tale of the smartest species doomed by that all-too-human characteristic of failing to see the bigger picture in pursuit of short-term goals.”

    But then, as almost always, Attenborough’s words were tinged with optimism. A recurring theme of his films has been that despite the dire state of the planet, humanity can still repair the damage it has done.

    “It’s not all doom and gloom,” he said in 2020’s A Life on Our Planet, a look back at his career. “There’s a chance for us to make amends, to complete our journey of development and once again become a species in balance with nature. All we need is the will to do so.”

    In the same film, he offered a prescription for making peace with nature. It centered on raising living standards in poorer countries to curb population growth, embracing clean energy, like solar and wind power, eating more plant-based foods, which are easier on the planet, and abandoning fossil fuels.

    “If we take care of nature, nature will take care of us,” he said. “It’s now time for our species to stop simply growing, to establish a life on our planet in balance with nature, to start to thrive.”

    Rare recognitions

    Attenborough’s work and activism would see him knighted (twice) and become the namesake of dozens of species, from attenborosaurus (a prehistoric swimming reptile) to nepenthes attenboroughii (a carnivorous plant).

    In recent years, Attenborough has continued to lend his voice to natural history documentaries, earning a pair of Emmy nominations in 2021 for narration. (In his career, he has won three Emmys and eight BAFTAs.)

    For decades, Attenborough has been sought by world leaders looking for solutions to the crises facing the natural world – and perhaps a jolt of his enthusiasm.

    In 2015 he visited the White House for a conversation with United States President Barack Obama. Obama asked Attenborough what sparked his “deep fascination” with the natural world.

    “I’ve never met a child who’s not interested in natural history,” he replied, perhaps recalling his fossil-hunting days in the English countryside. “So, the question is, how does anyone lose it?”

    In Nepal’s Madhes Province, Voters Turning Away From Madhes-Based Parties

    Locals appear disappointed with the performance of the Madhes-based parties and seem to be turning back towards traditional parties like the Nepali Congress and CPN-UML.

    Mukesh Pokhrel

    Taiyab Mansuri, a resident of Parsa village in Mahottari Rural Municipality-1, drives an auto-rickshaw from Janakpur to Jaleswar every day. In his rickshaw, he listens to the news daily, keenly following the upcoming local elections.

    “I’m not affiliated with any political party. I am just a voter,” said Mansuri, who has been driving his rickshaw and working in Nepal for the past six years. Before that, he used to work in Saudi Arabia, where he worked for 15 years doing labor work. He returned home in 2015, the year Nepal adopted its new federal political setup as envisioned in the new constitution. He was enthusiastic about the changes the country was going through and decided to stay back in the hope that development would finally make its way to his village. In the last local elections, he voted for Madhes-based political parties.

    But in the last five years, his mind has changed. He is no longer optimistic and has no faith in the parties.

    “This time, I have decided I will not vote for a party but for a given candidate’s capacity,” said Mansuri.

    Disappointed and resentful

    When the Madhes Movements erupted in 2007-2008 and in 2015, people expected the parties that led the movements would bring change to the Madhes in terms of development, education, health, agriculture, and employment. The movements instilled faith in the people regarding the political parties, which showed in the 2017 local elections.

    After the 2017 local elections, the Rastriya Janata Party Nepal, a Madhes-based party, had 25 rural municipalities chiefs in Madhes Province. Another Madhesh-based party, the Sanghiya Samajbadi Forum (Federal Socialist Forum) Nepal, had 26 mayors. Likewise, Mohammad Lalbabu Raut, the chief minister of Madhes Province, is from the Sanghiya Samajbadi Forum.

    In the years since, the Rastriya Janata Party, Saghiya Samajbadi Forum, and Naya Shakti merged to form the Janata Samajbadi Party. That party split in 2021 with senior politician Mahanta Thakur going on to form the Loktantrik Samajbadi Party-Nepal.

    Five years since the last elections, these political parties have little to show in terms of uplifting the living standard of the people in the province.

    Mahadev Saha, a political analyst and head of the Softech College in Lahan, said that voters are disappointed and resentful.

    “The people are not satisfied with the outcomes of the Madhes movements. They are now looking for a party that can lead the government in upcoming days,” Saha said.

    According to Saha, locals don’t believe that Madhes-based parties like the Janata Samajbadi Party and the Loktantrik Samajbadi Party, can deliver on their promises.

    Feel cheated

    Nagendra Paswan, a resident of Jaleswar in Mahottari, is also making plans to cast his vote for a different party this time around.

    “We voted for them, but they did not support the people,” Paswan told The Record.

    Paswan’s demands, like many others, are not great. A farmer by profession, all he wants is irrigation facilities in his field and fertilizers on time. “It is always a struggle to get fertilizers on time. The party that promises fertilizers on time to farmers will get the farmer’s vote,” he said.

    Tired of ineffective governance, young people too are stepping up. Twenty-four-year-old Dhiraj Singh, a resident of Dhanusha in Janakpur, is preparing for his independent candidacy for ward chairman.

    “We had faith in the political parties and we thought they would change Madhes. But they did nothing for the people. We feel cheated,” said Singh. “So now I’m preparing for my own candidacy. And the response I have received is positive. It’s time for young people to take leadership.”

    Back to tradition 

    Before the Madhes Movements of 2007 and 2008, the Tarai-Madhes was long the stronghold of the Nepali Congress. But since then, that comfortable voter base had slowly been whittled away by the Madhes-based parties and even the CPN-UML, which has a strong organizational base at the local level.

    But, according to political analyst Saha, the Congress is back on the cards in a big way and the upcoming local election will be contested between the Nepali Congress, CPN-UML, and Janata Samjabadi Party.

    “Nepali Congress and CPN-UML are not going to lose and that may weaken the Madhes-based parties,” said Saha. In his opinion, Mahanta Thakur’s Loktantrik Samajbadi Party and the Maoist Center have the most to lose in this election.

    Recent splits in the Janata Samajbadi Party and the CPN-UML have weakened both parties, providing the Nepali Congress with an opportunity. As the party that leads the federal coalition government, the Nepali Congress has been quite confident in its ability to win more elections than in 2017. The Congress was even considering not allying with any other party in an electoral alliance and going at it alone. However, the party has now decided to tie up with coalition members wherever possible.

    Congress-UML clash

    Bajrang Nepali, a Nepali Congress leader based in Mahottari, believes that the party does not need an alliance in Madhes Province.

    “We alone are strong enough to fight this election. There’s no need for an alliance,” said Nepali.

    According to Nepali, despite the party’s decision, local-level party members are asking that the Congress not ally with any other party. The Nepali Congress district committees of Bara and Saptari have both decided not to form an alliance with other parties, said Nepali.

    The UML, which was in a relatively weaker position in Madhes Pradesh in the previous local-level elections, is also aggressively campaigning. UML party chair KP Sharma Oli had alienated Madhesi voters with his nationalist stance that often came at the expense of Madhesis. But those slights have long been forgotten, said Saha.

    “The Madhes-based parties criticized Oil and the UML, but in the end, they joined the Oli government,” said Saha. “Voters learned the reality and it increased their attraction towards Oli.”

    Nepali Congress leader Bajrang Nepali agrees with Saha and said that his party’s primary competition was with the UML. Many Madhes-based party leaders and cadres have also joined the UML and that is certain to swing voters.

    The CK Raut factor

    CK Raut and his Janamat Party have long been wildcards in Madhesi politics. An advocate for an ‘independent Madhes’ and constantly under duress from the state authorities, Raut recently joined mainstream politics. Kathmandu believes that Raut is a major factor in the Madhes but conversations with locals show that his influence is limited and his party is not likely to win many, if any, seats in government.

    However, Raut does have significant support among the young and educated, who admire his political stance and dedication. This could impact the elections, especially the chances of Madhes-based parties.

    “Raut’s party may cut off votes from Madhes-based parties,” said Kamlesh Mandal, a Mahottari-based journalist. “Many of those who had supported Madhes-based parties in the past now say they are with Raut.”

     

    Mukesh Pokhrel is a Kathmandu-based journalist who writes issues on climate change, environment, social, and political.

    Image: Mukesh Pokhrel

    This piece has been sourced from The Record 

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres Requests Meetings with Putin, Zelenskyy

    The immediate impact of the war is the gravest in Ukraine. But it could have global ramifications, putting 1.7 billion people worldwide at risk of poverty, hunger and destitution.

    In efforts to end the war in Ukraine, Secretary-General António Guterres has written separate letters to the leaders of Russia and Ukraine to request meetings with them in their respective capitals, the United Nations said on Wednesday.

    UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said Guterres has asked President Vladimir Putin to receive him in Moscow and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to receive him in Kyiv.

    The letters were handed over to the countries’ UN Missions in New York on Tuesday.

    Urgent steps towards peace 

    “The Secretary-General said, at this time of great peril and consequence, he would like to discuss urgent steps to bring about peace in Ukraine and the future of multilateralism based on the Charter of the United Nations and international law,” said Dujarric.

    “He noted that both Ukraine and the Russian Federation are founding members of the United Nations and have always been strong supporters of this Organization.”

    The announcement came a day after the UN chief called for a humanitarian pause in Ukraine ahead of Orthodox Christian Easter this weekend.

    Support for humanitarian pause 

    The UN Crisis Coordinator for Ukraine, Amin Awad, has underlined the Secretary-General’s appeal amid the mounting humanitarian crisis in the country and the intensifying Russian offensive in the east.

    The four-day pause would allow for safe passage of civilians willing to leave conflict areas, he said, and the safe delivery of urgent humanitarian aid to people in the hardest hit areas of Mariupol, Kherson, Donetsk and Luhansk.

    “During this week – which marks a rare calendar alignment of the three of the most sacred religious holidays of Christian Orthodox Easter, Jewish Passover and the Muslim holy month of Ramadan – it is the time to focus on converging interests and set aside our differences,” said Awad.

    Casualties continue to mount in the war in Ukraine, which began on 24 February. There were 5,121 civilian casualties in the country as of Tuesday,  including 2,224 deaths, according to the latest update from the UN human rights office, OHCR.

    As Awad stated: “The loss of life and severe trauma caused by attacks on hospitals, schools and places of refuge is utterly shocking, as is the devastation of critical civilian infrastructure in the country.”

    Millions without water and electricity 

    The Ukraine conflict has generated the largest and fastest displacement in recent years.

    Some 12 million people have been forced to flee their homes, with more than five million crossing the border into neighbouring countries and beyond.

    Many of those left behind do not have access to water or electricity, while another 12 million are affected by economic hardship and a decline in services.

    In eastern Ukraine, some 1.4 million people are without access to running water, including in the besieged port city of Mariupol.  Millions more have only limited access to water and electricity.

    Amplified ramifications

    Additionally, some 136 attacks on health care facilities have been recorded since the start of the war, representing nearly 70 per cent of worldwide attacks on health so far this year.

    Growing insecurity, including due to contamination with explosive devices, is a significant obstacle to accessing hard to reach areas in the east.

    “This terrible toll on civilians must come to an end,” said Awad, warning that the war’s devastating impact could affect Ukraine for generations.

    “The immediate impact of this senseless war is the gravest here in Ukraine but it could have global ramifications, putting 1.7 billion people worldwide at risk of poverty, hunger and destitution”.

     

    Image: UNICEF / Giovanni Diffidenti  /  UNICEF