More

    Sexual Harassment and Sexism Rife in UK Schools: UNISON/UK Feminista Survey

    EducationSexual Harassment and Sexism Rife in UK Schools: UNISON/UK...
    - Advertisment -

    Sexual Harassment and Sexism Rife in UK Schools: UNISON/UK Feminista Survey

    Two in five staff who witnessed abusive incidents did not report them because they felt it was ‘pointless’. Reasons given included that such incidents were ‘brushed off’ or that raising concerns could affect their careers.

    Sexual harassment is widespread in schools with staff the target of physical advances, inappropriate comments and lewd remarks, according to the findings of a joint survey by British trade union UNISON and UK Feminista.

    A survey published on the opening day of the union’s annual conference last week, shows one in ten (10 per cent) female support staff in secondary schools say they’ve been sexually harassed, mainly by male pupils but also by their male colleagues.

    Among staff in schools across all age ranges, the figure was 7 per cent according to data based on the responses of more than 2,000 employees working mostly in primary and secondary education. Respondents included teaching assistants, technicians, lunchtime supervisors and administrators.

    Incidents included a male student trying to kiss a female worker and pushing her head into his crotch, or boys trying to touch or slap a staff member’s bottom. In another, a headteacher told a female colleague to “stand here and look pretty, I’ll do the talking”.

    - Advertisement -

    Around one in seven (15 per cent) school staff also reported they had witnessed sexual harassment in their workplace in the past five years. That figure rose to a quarter (25 per cent) in secondary schools.

    This abuse was mainly perpetrated by male pupils towards female classmates, but they also targeted female staff. Some incidents involved male staff behaving inappropriately towards their female colleagues.

    However, two in five (42 per dent) staff who witnessed abusive incidents did not report them because they felt it was ‘pointless’. Reasons given included that such incidents were ‘brushed off’ or that raising concerns could affect their careers.

    Homophobic dimension

    Sexist online content was another significant issue highlighted in the survey. Almost a quarter of school staff (24 per cent) had witnessed pupils discussing sexist online content. Of these employees, more than half (51 per cent) believed they had noticed changes in pupil behaviour as a result of viewing this content. This largely took the form of sexist language and conduct from boys towards female members of staff and pupils.

    A third (34 per cent) of school staff had heard sexist language being used in school in the past five years. In addition, more than one in 14 (seven per cent) respondents said they witnessed sexist talk at school daily. The misogynistic language reported was most often used between students, but also by staff and parents on occasion too.

    One in seven (15 per cent) respondents said sexist language had been used against them in the past five years. Use of derogatory female terms by students was reported as widespread, with female staff being subjected to sexualised, objectifying and threatening or intimidating language.

    Commonly reported was the use of terms like ‘man up’ towards male students. Boys were also frequently referred to as ‘girls’ as a derogatory term when they exhibited any kind of emotional behaviour.

    Additionally, there was a homophobic dimension to some of the language, with boys regularly being told certain behaviour or attitudes were ‘gay.’

    Gender stereotyping had been witnessed by a quarter (25 per cent) of respondents at their school within the past five years, with 5 per cent witnessing it daily.

    A total of 18 per cent of respondents stated they’d personally experienced gender stereotyping within their school in the past five years.

    Misogyny normalised

    The comments revealed this often took the form of the roles staff were expected to carry out. For men this would be manual tasks, while for women these would be caring, cleaning, and catering.

    Men were seen as strong whereas women were perceived as better suited to caring roles. One female employee was asked if a ‘male’ should drive the new school minibus; and another said male staff and pupils were given ‘more respect’ while women were ‘often ignored and considered emotional’.

    Commenting on the findings, UNISON general secretary Christina McAnea said,  “Parents will be horrified to learn their children are being taught in such toxic environments. The danger is that language and behaviour learned at an early age stay with pupils as they become adults and go out into the wider world.

    “Any male staff with such outdated attitudes need to think carefully about how they interact with colleagues and pupils. They must ditch such highly inappropriate behaviour immediately.

    “But clearly schools can’t tackle this huge problem on their own. Parents have a proper role to play too. Sexist and demeaning words have no place in the modern class or staff room.

    “The role of misogynist influencers cannot be overstated. A solution must be found before this worrying issue spirals out of control.”

    UK Feminista’s deputy director Nina Humphries said, “It is deeply concerning that misogyny is so normalised in schools. This fuels violence against women and girls and limits the aspirations of all young people.

    “These joint survey results contribute to the abundance of evidence that sexism and sexual harassment are rife in the UK education system. Staff and students alike face this unacceptable behaviour. More must be done to make schools and colleges safer.”

    Image: Don Cload via Wikimedia

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    Study Finds No Teaching Quality Gap Between Reservation and General Category Faculty in Indian Engineering Colleges

    Many countries operate affirmative-action, diversity or preferential-hiring programmes in universities and the public sector.

    India’s Retail Inflation Surges to Two-Year High of 6.09% as Food Costs Breach Central Bank Comfort Zone

    While a single monthly reading above 6 per cent does not constitute a formal policy failure, the persistent upward trajectory since early 2026 leaves monetary authorities with little room to manoeuvre.

    Global Experts Unveil First International Food Pyramid Prioritising Plant Foods and Quality Carbohydrates

    The authors stress that individual knowledge alone is insufficient. Food environments – marketing, pricing, availability and access – must support healthier choices.

    Ultra-Thin Carbon Nanomembranes Deliver Fivefold Boost in Water Purification Efficiency

    The Convert2Green Open Innovation Test Bed remains open to enterprises seeking to evaluate and adapt the technology for their specific needs.
    - Advertisement -

    Delhi Turns to Cloud Seeding in High-Stakes Gamble Against Choking Winter Smog

    Aviation crews remain stationed near their hangars, radar screens remain trained on western horizons, and some 30 million residents across the capital region wait to see whether engineered clouds can offer a rare gasp of clean air.

    Eight Tiger Cubs Signal New Hope for Breeding Beyond Ranthambore

    The story of Kailadevi fits into a larger narrative of recovery tempered by realism. India’s tiger numbers have risen, but space, prey and connectivity will decide whether that growth continues.

    Must read

    Study Finds No Teaching Quality Gap Between Reservation and General Category Faculty in Indian Engineering Colleges

    Many countries operate affirmative-action, diversity or preferential-hiring programmes in universities and the public sector.

    India’s Retail Inflation Surges to Two-Year High of 6.09% as Food Costs Breach Central Bank Comfort Zone

    While a single monthly reading above 6 per cent does not constitute a formal policy failure, the persistent upward trajectory since early 2026 leaves monetary authorities with little room to manoeuvre.
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you