More

    Moneylenders, Debtors Battle It Out on the Streets of Kathmandu

    Civil societyFreedom of speech and expressionMoneylenders, Debtors Battle It Out on the Streets of...
    - Advertisment -

    Moneylenders, Debtors Battle It Out on the Streets of Kathmandu

    The law has proven incapable of meeting the objectives it was framed for – the indebted people, who are back in Kathmandu, say that the law is a damp squib and no action has been taken against any moneylender so far.

    Laxmi Khanal

    The lens is back on Nepal’s informal moneylending sector, or simply put, the Nepalese moneylenders. Months after the Himalayan country’s legislature okayed a law for punishing moneylenders, their debtors are protesting in the federal capital city, Kathmandu, demanding implementation of the law. This has put the government in a spot.

    The protestors arrived and gathered in Kathmandu after marching for 23 days from various districts across the country last Friday.

    Participants taking part in the march launched in the initiative of the Usury Victims Peasants Workers Struggle Committee set out for Kathmandu on foot – a long journey for justice.  

    Nepal’s media seems divided – the nomenclature for the moneylenders varies. Some refer to them as loan sharks. Others call them usurers.

    - Advertisement -

    The law, put in place in July last year, has provisions like rigorous imprisonment for up to seven years for usurers engaging in ‘unfair transactions’. (The bill terms forcible transfer of the debtor’s immovable property through the use of any kind of threat or violence or exploitation for the purpose of debt recovery as an unfair transaction.)

    But the law has proven incapable of meeting the objectives it was framed for – the indebted people, who are back in Kathmandu, say that no action has been taken against any moneylender so far.

    The debtors are now coming out and many have staged a sit-in against the loan sharks. According to the Rising Nepal newspaper, “in Sarlahi district alone, well over 700 usury victims have already come in contact with a committee that has been working against this form of exploitation.”

    Talk team formed

    Earlier, the Nepal government had claimed that it addressed the problems of usury victims. But, on Sunday, the government seemed to buckle as the debtors gathered in upmarket Baluwatar, next door to the Prime Minister’s official residence, to exert pressure on the government to “sustainably resolve” their problems – the Ministry of Home Affairs has invited the protesting usury victims for talks. The ministry has written to the ‘Struggle Committee’, calling them for discussions. (The ‘Struggle Committee’ was formed by the victims of extortionate money-lending.)

    A talk team has been formed, coordinated by a joint-secretary of the ministry of home affairs who will be assisted by two under-secretaries. The team has asked the protesting loan-shark victims to form a five-member talk team for a dialogue.

    “Informal talks are being held with the loan-shark victims at present,” the Rising Nepal newspaper quoted Ek Dev Adhikari, under-secretary at the ministry as saying. “We have urged them to sit for talk today itself if possible,” he said, adding that “they are in touch with us and undergoing internal discussions.”

    The ministry acknowledged that its attention was drawn towards callouts, sit-ins and demonstrations of the victims of extortionate money-lending.

    But the lack of political will was also obvious, as Adhikaris said, the ministry appraised that efforts were underway for reconciliation between the victims and loan sharks.

    On another plane, the government is also speaking of bringing in an amendment in the related laws and formation of a high-powered commission for the law to be implemented.

    The Nepal Police has been entrusted with the responsibility of registering the cases that eluded consensus between the lenders and debtors in accordance with the prevailing laws, while the Chief District Officers will monitor the process. The usury victims, however, have not agreed the ministry’s statement.

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    Bangladesh: Clock Ticking on Ganges Water Treaty as 2026 Deadline Looms

    Without renewed cooperation grounded in updated science, transparent data and mutual restraint, the Ganges risks becoming a source of friction rather than a shared lifeline. 

    Sri Lanka Urges End to Indefinite UN Human Rights Mandates at Geneva Council

    The discussion reflects deeper tensions between the imperative of accountability for past violations and the sovereign claim of states to lead their own reconciliation processes.

    China Sets Ambitious 725 Million Tonne Grain Target by 2030 to Fortify Food Security

    China has placed food security at the centre of its national strategy, setting a binding target to raise annual grain production capacity to 725 million metric tonnes by 2030.

    Rivers Swallow Land Five Times the Size of Dhaka in Five Decades

    Gaibandha faces the largest land loss among the Jamuna sites, while Kurigram risks the greatest settlement area.
    - Advertisement -

    Sri Lanka Seeks India’s Backing in War on Indian Ocean Drug Trafficking

    The appeal came during a high-level meeting with visiting Indian Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh on 9 September 2026, the first such visit by an Indian defence minister in 38 years.

    Panama Canal Slashes Daily Ship Transits as El Niño Drought Tightens Grip

    For global trade, the message is clear: the shortest route between the Atlantic and Pacific is no longer a reliable constant.

    Must read

    Bangladesh: Clock Ticking on Ganges Water Treaty as 2026 Deadline Looms

    Without renewed cooperation grounded in updated science, transparent data and mutual restraint, the Ganges risks becoming a source of friction rather than a shared lifeline. 

    Sri Lanka Urges End to Indefinite UN Human Rights Mandates at Geneva Council

    The discussion reflects deeper tensions between the imperative of accountability for past violations and the sovereign claim of states to lead their own reconciliation processes.
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you