More

    US$140 Billion Needed to Tackle Lifestyle Diseases, Says Report

    Progress is lacking on UN goals for heart disease, cancer, diabetes and others and an annual investment of US$18 million is needed to promote healthy habits alone. International aid is needed to help poorer countries meet targets for lifestyle diseases.

    By Sanjeet Bagcchi

    Reaching UN goals on diseases such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes by 2030 will need an average investment of US$18 million a year, targeting policies to cut smoking, alcohol abuse, and unhealthy diets, according to global analysis.

    These and other non-communicable diseases, including stroke and chronic respiratory diseases, kill 41 million people worldwide each year, with 77 per cent of deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries, World Health Organization (WHO) data shows.

    The majority of countries have made little progress towards Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.4, which aims to reduce premature deaths from these types of diseases by a third between 2015 and 2030, says a paper published on 26 March in The Lancet. But the target for most of these illnesses could still be achieved with the right combination of interventions – reaping huge financial rewards in the process – it suggests.

    The health policy paper sets out 21 recommended interventions to help 123 low- and middle-income countries achieve the SDG target, but warns that substantial technical and financial assistance may be needed from the global community.

    Cherian Varghese, an author of the paper from the WHO’s department of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Geneva, Switzerland, told SciDev.Net: “Countries with policy, legislative and regulatory measures, including fiscal measures, for the prevention and control of NCDs, as well as strong and inclusive health systems have had the best outcomes against [them].

    Substantial economic rewards

    “In those countries, people living with and affected by NCDs are more likely to have access to effective NCD services, including protection against risk factors, screening for hypertension and diabetes, treatment of NCDs and consistent, quality follow-up and care,” Varghese said.

    About 85 per cent of the 15 million premature deaths from non-communicable diseases among people aged between 30 and 69 take place in low- and middle-income countries, according to the WHO. The increase in these diseases is attributed mainly to physical inactivity, unhealthy diets, use of tobacco, and harmful use of alcohol.

    In 2015 the SDGs were taken up by the United Nations as a “universal call to action” for ending poverty and ensuring “peace and prosperity” for all by 2030. SDG 3 deals with healthy lives and wellbeing. Target 3.4 aims to reduce early death from NCDs by a third by 2030 through prevention and treatment, and to promote mental health and wellbeing.

    Katie Dain, one of the paper’s authors and chief executive officer of the NCD Alliance, a Switzerland-based non-governmental organisation, says all countries can achieve or nearly achieve the SDG target by 2030 “by introducing a cost-effective package of NCD prevention and treatment interventions”.

    “The bottom line is that governments can reap substantial economic rewards, in both the short- and long-run, by taking bold action on NCDs and thus ensuring the fiscal sustainability of their health systems,” she told SciDev.Net.

    To achieve the target globally an additional investment of US$140 billion is needed between 2023 and 2030, an average of $18 billion a year, the authors estimate. They say this would prevent 39 million deaths over the period – particularly from heart attacks and strokes – and reap economic rewards of US$2.7 trillion.

    Catalytic aid

    The experts say “catalytic aid” from international development agencies is necessary alongside domestic spending by governments to meet the goal. But budgetary constraints in low-income countries, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, have made national investment a challenge.

    Mayowa Owolabi, dean of the faculty of clinical sciences at the University of Ibadan, Nigeria, told SciDev.Net: “These costs would comprise a considerable share of [a country’s] health budget. Mobilisation of additional resources would be required in low-income and lower-middle-income countries.”

    Owolabi explained that challenges in meeting the SDG 3.4 target include lack of jawareness, low detection or diagnosis rates, low treatment rates, and poor control of diseases such as obesity and high blood pressure, or hypertension.

    “A population-based multi-stakeholder, multi-sectoral approach including policymakers, patients, and indeed the entire populace across the life course is required,” he added. “This will include lifestyle interventions, creating an enabling environment that supports physical activities, and a healthy food value chain towards prevention of multiple NCDs.”

    Specific interventions to speed up progress may vary nationally and regionally, according to the paper. But it says policies to cut behavioural risks including tobacco smoking, harmful alcohol use, and excess sodium intake are relevant for every country and can reduce the need for costly clinical services.

    According to Varghese, non-communicable diseases need to be part of national preparedness and response plans. “The economic effects of the [COVID-19] pandemic are likely to have a long-term impact on NCD prevention and control,” he said.

    Suvadip Chakrabarti, a consultant surgical oncologist at the Apollo Cancer Centre in Kolkata, India, believes that government initiatives alone are not enough to tackle the problem, especially in resource-limited countries.

    He says behavioural change at the individual level is critical. “In India, tobacco-related cancers account for every third patient in [hospital outpatient departments]. The government can levy taxes, increase screening programmes, and increase the number of cancer centres, but [it is also important that the] population at large becomes aware and abstains from [tobacco] use.”

     

    This piece has been sourced from SciDev.Net

    Image: Hippopx, licensed to use under Creative Commons Zero – CC0

     

    First Person: Visions of Hell, in Haiti

    Samuel (not his real name) grew up near the Haitian Capital of Port-au-Prince, and has seen his childhood home descend into lawlessness and gang violence. Now a staff member with the UN Development Programme (UNDP) in the country, he faces the daily risk of kidnapping, or worse. “The future of Haiti is very uncertain,” he says. “We live in a failed State.”

    “I spent much of my childhood in the south of the capital, in Cité Plus, from the age of 10, until I got married 16 years later. Back then, it was a peaceful neighbourhood, but it has been transformed into a lawless, hellish zone.

    We didn’t grow up wealthy, but we always had enough to eat, and my parents (my father was an electrical engineer and my mother a shopkeeper) made enough to send me and my three siblings to private schools. I went on to study philosophy at the University of Haiti, as well as law and economics.

    I later studied as a multimedia journalist, and joined UNDP in 2014, initially as a volunteer and, two years later, as a staff member.

    Haiti, UNDP, Rule of law, law and order, insecurity

    Constant insecurity

    The positive side of working at UNDP is that, on the ground, we get to meet principled, resilient people who believe in a better future with a strong community spirit, who work hard, in the absence of basic public services.

    And, at our offices, I work with extraordinary colleagues, who maintain their professionalism and work effectively, despite the many crises that have an effect on their personal and work lives.

    However, we all work under a persistent sense of insecurity, and the fear that people will find out where we work.

    Many people believe that all UN staff members are rich, and this gives rise to jealousy and even hatred, amongst those who don’t have the same opportunities as us, in a country with a very high rate of unemployment.

    With the alarming rise in the number of kidnappings we have seen recently, this sense of insecurity is increasing.

    A life-threatening commute

    I knew that, as a staff member for an international organization in Port-au-Prince, I would only be able to live in certain neighbourhoods, and would have to be careful who I told about my job.

    Over the last year, as the security situation has deteriorated, I have also had to be careful which roads I take to get to work. This is the case for me, and other colleagues who live in areas such as Carrefour, Mariani, Merger, Gressier, or Léogâne.

    My wife and I are obliged to stay with family in Port-au-Prince during the week, even though we have built a family home in Gressier. Our two children are at school there, and we can only hope to see them on the weekend, if we are able to make the journey.

    Otherwise, we can only communicate by telephone, as if we were living in another country.

    Commuting is too dangerous. The authorities have lost control of the Martissant-Fontamara road, and gangsters are pillaging the population, raping women and shooting at passengers on buses or in cars.

    Haiti, UNDP, Rule of law, law and order, insecurity

    Horrors on the road

    Travelling by road means accepting that you will be driving past human bodies, left on the roadside to be eaten by dogs. I doubt that those killed in Martissant even figure in the official death statistics.

    Things really were different before. During my childhood, Cité Plus was like many other neighbourhoods of Port-au-Prince. There were many poor families, single mothers, and children whose parents couldn’t afford to feed them or send them to school, but there was less crime.

    Today in Haiti, ideas such as free choice, free movement, and security are becoming more and more removed from reality.

    Haiti, UNDP, Rule of law, law and order, insecurity

    ‘I feel as if I’m in a country that is dying’

    The future of Haiti is very uncertain. We live in a failed State. I don’t feel that we have the leaders in a position of authority to restore order.

    It’s a situation of total terror. I feel as if I’m in a country that is dying.

    Whatever happens, I will fight to survive, no matter what. But to survive, you need to stay alive, and I’m worried that the insecurity is getting closer and closer to me.

    Many of my acquaintances have become victims of violence and kidnappings, either directly or indirectly. I fear that my wife and children are targets for criminals.

    Given the current situation, many people have left the country, and many more are planning to leave. Even the intellectual elite, those with a decent quality of life, are emigrating.

    I want to stay in a Haiti whose institutions work for its citizens, without any discrimination, where inequality is reduced, and all citizens have access to basic services.

    I don’t think that Haiti is necessarily doomed. We can find our way out of this mess, as long as there is a collective awakening, and a critical mass decides to get us back on track. But this will require a lot of sacrifices, and a willingness to act in the collective interest.

     

    This piece has been sourced from UN News.

    Image: UNDP Hiati

    Bangladesh: New Restrictions on Rohingya Camps

    Authorities in Bangladesh have arbitrarily destroyed thousands of shops while imposing new obstacles on travel within the camps in Cox’s Bazar, denying the Rohingya the ability to live freely and independently, says Human Rights Watch

    “Bangladesh is understandably burdened with hosting nearly one million Rohingya refugees, but cutting them off from opportunities to work and study is only compounding their vulnerability and dependence on aid,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The Bangladesh government should formalize and expand employment opportunities to bolster the Rohingya’s self-reliance and enable them to support their families and communities.”

    Rohingya refugees have described to HRW how the new restrictions have prevented them from being able to provide for their families, give their children an education, or build communities. At the same time, Bangladesh officials have pressured the refugees to relocate to Bhasan Char island or return to Myanmar. The worsening conditions in the camps raises concerns that authorities are acting deliberately to coerce refugees to leave, Human Rights Watch said.

    Even prior to the shop demolitions, Rohingya reported that access to employment was their greatest concern in the camps, according to a 2021 survey by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Although refugees are not officially permitted to work, over half the Rohingya and 30 per cent of children ages 15 to17 reported doing informal work, putting them at risk of exploitation and arrest, the UHCR document says.

    The informal marketplaces set up by Rohingya became vital sources of income for covering basic needs and supplementing aid rations. But beginning in October 2021, officials began bulldozing shops in several camps, often without notice. More than 3,000 shops have been destroyed, affecting tens of thousands of refugees.

    Subsistence, say refugees

    Mohammed Ali, 37 (name changed), ran a clothing shop that was demolished without notice, destroying 300,000 BDT (US$3,500) worth of clothes and leaving him in debt. “I had to take loans to build up the products in my store,” he said. “Now it’s become impossible for me to pay them back.”

    Another shopkeeper, Abdul Amin, 28, said that shop owners had tried to negotiate with the Camp-in-Charge when they heard other markets were being demolished. “They didn’t hear our requests,” he said. “They didn’t even allow us to take the remaining products from our shops. They just came and demolished with bulldozers.”

    Abdul Amin said that 40 refugees depended on his business, including his 15 family members and the families of his four employees. “Now I cannot buy extra food needed for my family,” he said. “I cannot afford medicine needed for my mother. I cannot give my children education.… My workers have been continually telling me how tough it has become for them also to support their families.”

    Refugees said that the income from the shops helped them supplement the limited food rations of oil, rice, and lentils. “The ration we get as aid isn’t enough for a whole family,” said Mohammed Ali, who had earned about 30,000 BDT (US$ 350) a month at his clothing shop to support his family of 10.

    Amir, 37, ran a mobile phone repair shop earning about 500 BDT ($6) a day, which allowed him to buy vegetables, fish, and necessary supplies for his six-person family. “Now the authorities won’t even allow me to run my business from my shelter,” he said. “I really don’t understand how our simple initiative to live slightly better lives in the camps harms Bangladesh.”

    A grocery shop owner, 35, said his family of 11 and the families of his two employees were dependent on the store income. “The demolition of the marketplace destroyed my shop and so many like mine,” he said. “Now we’ve turned into beggars again.”

    Illegal, say officials

    Bangladesh’s deputy refugee commissioner, Shamsud Douza, told The Guardian that the shops were demolished because they were “illegal.” A senior government official told the UN special rapporteur on Myanmar, “Livelihood opportunity is not the responsibility of Bangladesh.”

    Many refugees said their attempts to continue operating their businesses from their shelters had also been shut down. “Since the demolition, authorities won’t allow us to run another business,” Mohammed Ali said. “They said it’s prohibited, and that we are not living in our own country, we are living in another country, and we cannot earn money in another territory.”

    The nearly one million Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh lack recognized legal status, which puts them on precarious footing under domestic law and makes them vulnerable to rights violations. However, as a party to core international human rights treaties, Bangladesh is obligated to ensure everyone in its jurisdiction, including refugees, has access to fundamental rights, including freedom of movement, livelihoods, education, and health care, Human Rights Watch said.

    Rohingya also described new arbitrary restrictions on movement within the camps in recent months, including threats, frequent curfews, and harassment at checkpoints. “Before, we used to move freely around the camps to visit friends and families,” Amir said. “But now we face a lot of questioning by the authorities whenever we’re outside our shelter.”

    One refugee, 43, said that in the past, he had been able to travel freely within the camps, but in December, officers of the armed police battalion (APBn) stopped him at a checkpoint on his way to visit family in another camp, claiming he did not have the camp official’s permission. “This time, they made me wait at their checkpoint until my family members bribed the APBn officials,” he said. “Since then, I stopped going outside of my shelter.”

     

    Image: Roger Arnold / UNHCR

    Ukraine’s President Calls on Security Council to Act for Peace, or ‘Dissolve’ Itself

    In an impassioned address to the Security Council that evoked the ashen destruction wrought during the Second World War, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday described in stark detail what he said was the deliberate slaughter of civilians in Bucha by Russian forces, laying out an existential choice for its members, over the whole future of the world’s security architecture, founded in 1945.

    “We are dealing with a State that is turning the veto of the United Nations Security Council into the right to die”, President Zelynskyy warned.  If it continues, countries will rely not on international law or global institutions to ensure security, but rather, on the power of their own arms.

    Noting that he had just returned from Bucha, the newly liberated suburb of Kyiv that has become notorious since images of mass civilian deaths there emerged at the weekend, he recounted how Russian forces had sought and purposely killed anyone who served Ukraine.

    He was addressing the Council today, he said, in honour of the deceased:  those shot in the head after being tortured, thrown into wells, crushed by tanks while sitting in their cars, and those whose limbs were cut off and tongues pulled out because the aggressors “did not hear what they wanted to hear”.

    Tactics used by terrorists

    He accused Russia of wanting to “turn Ukrainians into silent slaves” and openly stealing everything, “starting with food and ending with gold earrings that are pulled out and covered with blood”.

    These tactics, he said, are no different than those used by terrorist group Da’esh – except that they are now being perpetrated by a permanent member of the Security Council.  “Where is the security that the Security Council must guarantee?” he implored.

    Recalling that Holocaust organizer Adolf Eichmann did not go unpunished, the Ukrainian president said it was time for reform.  “The power of peace must become dominant”.

    He challenged the Council to either remove the Russian Federation as a source of war so it can no longer block decisions made about its own aggression, or simply “dissolve yourselves altogether” if there is nothing to do other than engage in conversation.  “Are you ready to close the United Nations?  Do you think that the time for international law is gone?” he asked.

    “Ukraine needs peace.  Europe needs peace.  The world needs peace,” he insisted.

    Bolstering that plea in an earlier briefing to the Council, UN Secretary-General António Guterres, expressed deep regret over divisions that have prevented the Council from acting not only on Ukraine – but on other threats to peace around the world.  He urged the Organization’s flagship security body to do “everything in its power” to end the war.

    Doubling of civilian deaths

    Under-Secretary-General for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs Rosemary DiCarlo similarly noted that conditions had seriously deteriorated since her 17 March briefing.  The number of Ukrainian civilians killed has more than doubled; Ukrainian cities continue to be mercilessly pounded, often indiscriminately, by heavy artillery and aerial bombardments; and hundreds of thousands of people remain trapped in encircled areas under nightmarish conditions.

    “The devastation wrought on Mariupol and other Ukrainian cities is one of the shameful hallmarks of this senseless war,” she said.

    She called on Kyiv and Moscow to quickly translate any progress in their ongoing negotiations into action on the ground, emphasizing that indiscriminate attacks are prohibited under international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes.

    “The massive destruction of civilian objects and the high number of civilian casualties, strongly indicate that the fundamental principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution have not been sufficiently adhered to,” she stressed.

    Lives stuffed into backpacks

    In the ensuing debate, United States Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that behind the images of bombed out buildings, many people had “stuffed their lives into backpacks” and left the only home they had ever known.

    She gave her own account of the refugee crisis in parts of Europe, having returned on 4 April from the Republic of Moldova and Romania.

    Based on available information, she said the United States has assessed that Russian forces committed war crimes in Ukraine.  The United States is seeking suspension of the Russian Federation from the Human Rights Council, as Moscow uses its membership as a platform for its propaganda, she said.

    Russia counters accusations

    Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia countered that in fact his country had saved 123,500 people in Mariupol, without any help from Ukraine.  Over 600,000 people have been evacuated to Russian territory since its “special operation” began.  “We’re not talking about coercion or abduction”, he clarified.  These voluntary decisions are supported by videos on social media, he said.

    To Ukraine’s President, he said: “We place on your conscience the ungrounded accusations against the Russian military,” which are uncorroborated by eye-witnesses.

    He said any hopes tied to the President’s election had failed to materialize following his launch of a linguistic inquisition against Russian speakers in the Donbas region. “We were on the verge of correcting injustices” sparked by the 2014 events at Maidan, he recalled.

    In reply to accusations against Russian forces criminality in Bucha, he blamed Kyiv and the Western media for promoting “flagrant inconsistencies” and said that there are, in fact, recordings of Ukrainian radicals shooting civilians.

    Moreover, he said, the corpses seen in a graphic video presented to the Council by President Zelenskyy “in no way” resemble those who reportedly had been on the ground for four days.  He implored Ukraine’s President to recognize that his country is only a pawn in the geopolitical game against the Russian Federation.

    Sanctions on Russia: Economic Weapons of Mass Destruction

    In addition to supplying Ukraine with military weapons, governments around the world also have deployed economic weapons against Russia — a dangerous nuclear power. Russia, an economic midget relative to its military power, may still lash out by expanding the range of military weapons it uses and the territories it targets. It is a risk the world had to take.

    By Raghuram Rajan  /  University of Chicago

    Compared to Russia’s indiscriminate bombing, economic weapons will not kill people as quickly, create as much visible destruction or inspire as much fear. But the unprecedented economic weapons that have been deployed against Russia will be unquestionably painful.

    The strictures on Russia’s central bank have already contributed to the Russian rouble’s collapse and new limitations on cross-border payments and financing have had an immediate impact, weakening confidence in Russian banks. Though trade sanctions and the exodus of multinational corporations from Russia will have a less immediate effect, they will reduce economic growth and increase unemployment significantly over time. If these measures are not reversed, they will eventually translate into lower living standards, poorer health and more deaths in Russia.

    That we have come to this point reflects a widespread political breakdown. Too many powerful countries are now being led by nationalist authoritarian rulers. Their nationalist credentials make them less willing to compromise internationally, while they also have few domestic checks to restrain their behaviour. If Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression were to go unpunished, more international provocations like his war in Ukraine would become inevitable.

    Sanctions as WMDs

    Equally problematic is the breakdown of the international order. The UN Security Council cannot legitimately act against any of its permanent veto-wielding members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States). The organisation’s impotence translates into impunity for strongmen who flout international norms. Even if the UN could approve a military response, the will to confront a determined nuclear power militarily would probably be lacking.

    Economic weapons, made possible by global integration, offer a way to bypass a paralysed global governance system. They allow other powers an effective (that is, painful) but civilised way to respond to aggression.

    But the risks that these weapons can create must not be underplayed. When fully unleashed, sanctions, too, are weapons of mass destruction (WMD). They may not topple buildings or collapse bridges, but they destroy firms, financial institutions, livelihoods and even lives. Like military WMDs, they inflict pain indiscriminately, striking both the culpable and the innocent. If they are used too widely, they could reverse the process of globalisation that has allowed the modern world to prosper.

    There are several related concerns here. For starters, the seemingly bloodless nature of economic weapons and the lack of norms governing them, could result in their overuse. The United States still maintains harsh sanctions against Cuba even though there are far worse regimes in the world and China recently sanctioned Australian exports, apparently in retaliation for Australia’s demand for a full inquiry into the origins of COVID-19.

    Equally worrisome is the growing public pressure on corporations to stop doing business in certain countries. These demands can lead to sanctions being broadened beyond what policymakers intended. It is not impossible to imagine a country being subjected to economic warfare because of its government’s position on abortion or climate change for example.

    Need for new safeguards

    A widespread fear of indiscriminate sanctions would lead to more defensive behaviour. Following the action taken against Russia’s central bank, China, India and many other countries will worry that their own foreign-exchange holdings (of advanced-economy debt) may prove unusable if a few countries decide to freeze their assets. With few other assets possessing the liquidity of dollar or euro reserves, countries will start limiting activities that necessitate reserve holdings, such as cross-border corporate borrowing.

    More countries also might start exploring collective alternatives to the SWIFT financial messaging network, potentially leading to fragmentation of the global payments system. Private firms might become even warier of mediating investment or trade between countries that do not share political and social values.

    There could also be more zero-sum strategic behaviour, with countries developing new countermeasures to economic weapons. For example, a country might invite foreign banks into its market with the ulterior motive of someday holding their assets and capital hostage. Countries may also limit where their banks can operate to reduce their vulnerability to such threats. Inevitably, economic interactions between countries will shrink.

    While economic weapons have helped the world bypass a paralysed global governance system in response to Russia’s war of aggression, they also highlight the need for new safeguards in the future. Otherwise, we risk creating an economically balkanised and poorer world.

    Voluntary consensus

    As economic weapons are too powerful to leave in the hands of any one country, their use should be subject to a minimal consensus requirement. Sanctions are more effective when more countries participate, so this mechanism may already be inbuilt. Yet the threat of secondary sanctions can force otherwise unwilling countries to cooperate. The requirement should be based on voluntary consensus — and the more destructive the economic weapon, the broader the required consensus should be.

    Likewise, there should be a gradation of weapon use. Moves against the assets of aggressor-country elites should have the highest priority and lowest consensus requirements. Advanced economies should facilitate this by no longer turning a blind eye to the proceeds of tax evasion, corruption and theft from elsewhere that are parked in their jurisdictions. Moves to debase an aggressor’s currency or undermine its financial system can turn middle-class liberals and reformers into angry nationalists and so they should be taken with more deliberation and maximal consensus.

    Advanced economies will be understandably reluctant to place constraints on their own newly discovered powers. But they should recognise that a balkanised global economy would hurt everyone. Holding talks on ‘economic arms control’ could be a first step toward fixing the broken global order. Peaceful coexistence is always better than war, no matter how it is waged.

     

    Raghuram Rajan is former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and is Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

    This piece has been sourced from the East Asia Forum of the Australian National University.

    Image: Wikimedia. Representational image.

    Few Dare to Steer Sri Lanka’s Rudderless Economic Ship

    Two Sri Lankan finance ministers have resigned in the space of two days. The governor of the country’s central bank had also resigned on Monday, and on Tuesday, the treasury secretary put in his papers.

    A spate of resignations of top officials charged with steering Sri Lanka’s economy has exacerbated the dire state of the country’s economy.

    Sri Lanka’s newly appointed Finance Minister Ali Sabry resigned on Tuesday, within 24 hours of his appointment.

    Sabry had replaced President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s brother, Basil Rajapaksa who resigned with his 25 other cabinet colleagues.

    Sabry said that his resignation comes “after much reflection and deliberation, and taking into consideration the current situation”.

    The island nation’s treasury secretary S R Attygalle too resigned his portfolio on Tuesday. This accelerated the momentum of the country’s economic crisis turning into a political crisis.

    Earlier, the governor of the country’s central bank’s, Ajith Nivard Cabraal had resigned on Monday after a weekend of protests over rising living costs and power cuts.

    The resignation of the central bank governor has put on hold already delayed decisions on interest rate, adding to the instability of the Sri Lankan rupee.

    Treasury secretary Attygalle was second to the central bank governor Cabraal.

    It is now learnt that a former deputy governor, P Nandalal Weerasinghe, will take up the position of the central bank governor, eight years after he had left Australia.

    Sri Lanka’s worsening crisis follows a series of mismanaged economic decisions, beginning with the decision to impose organic farming overnight. Food production fell and simultaneously, as if the Gods had planned it thus, the COVID-19 pandemic brought tourist arrivals to a grinding halt.

    In a matter of days, thousands of Sri Lankan overseas workers too returned home. The government resorted The resulting foreign exchange crisis meant that there was no fuel to run power-generation stations and a shortage of essential commodities.

    The government’s decision to print more currency didn’t help either.

    With galloping inflation, closing industries, increasing debts and a poor record of servicing foreign debts, the country today offers a textbook case of how not to handle a country’s economy.

     

    Image: Wikimedia

    UN Should Aspire to Turn Sports into a Tool for Social Change

    Sports can be a glue that connects people but it can also be a potent platform where disadvantaged persons can train their skills and fulfil their ambitions.

    By Pawan Ghimire and Simone Galimberti

    The International Day of Sport for Development and Peace, which will be commemorated on April 6, is a day that celebrates the positive effects that sports can have on the society.

    Humanity needs to confront existential challenges but few remember that in September 2019 the United Nations declared the then upcoming decade as the ‘Decade of Action”, ten precious years where the world would act at unison to achieve the Agenda 2030.

    Then the international community could not imagine that a devastating pandemic was about to come and the consequences of COVID-19 are still being experienced throughout the world.

    The suffering and painful experiences that many of us have been going through in the last two years show that the vision enshrined in the Agenda 2030 is still a far cry from being realized.

    The United Nations Secretary General’s response to these daunting challenges is called “Our Common Agenda”, a blueprint for a stronger, fairer and more inclusive multilateral world.

    In this special day we need to ensure that sports can play a significant role in putting such bold plans into action, turning ambitious goals into a real opportunity to mobilize millions of people.

    This is the power of sports and it is key that we think of sports for development and peace not as a standing alone sub-area.

    Rather our efforts should be to turn the entire sports industry into a tool for social change.

    Transformative power

    Certainly, when we talk about sports for development and peace, we refer to thousands of not-for-profit organizations, the vast majority of whom, despite their small in size and budgets, are active on the ground, trying to offer solutions to myriad of problems at local level.

    For example, sports can bring people together and be an enhancer of a society that is more equal and just where women, vulnerable groups can have a stronger voice and agency.

    If we think about disability, we know that millions of persons with disabilities in the developing world, still face multiple problems that deny them their rights to have a dignified life.

    Investing in inclusive sports practices can be a powerful tool that can bring people together, persons with disabilities but also persons without disabilities.

    It can be an important advocacy tool for a better level playing field, allowing people without disabilities to think and reflect about their privileges and the lack thereof for their disable peers.

    In short sports can be a glue that connects people but it can also be a potent platform where disadvantaged persons can train their skills and fulfil their ambitions.

    Let’s call this the uniquely transformative power of sports.

    We know many stories of sports celebrities, champions admired throughout the world that could find their path to glory because of their achievements in the field of sports.

    That’s why this special day should not be just celebrated as a day for committed advocates and practitioners alone but rather as an opportunity to push for a better leveraging of sports to help those left behind and at disadvantage to find a way forward in life.

    For this to happen, we need a comprehensive strategy able to attract the interest of all stakeholders involved in sports.

    Mainstreaming sports

    The truth is that, while sports for development and peace is more and more recognized worldwide as a social innovation, there is still huge divide between such practices and the mainstream sports industry.

    Many global sports clubs with resources and phenomenal outreach are doing their bit to promote a positive use of sports within local communities but we need to be more ambitious.

    What it is indispensable is to reach a new global understanding on the transformative role sports can have.

    That’s why the United Nations Secretary General needs to elevate sports at the core of his Our Common Agenda, ensuring that sports can be, not only the unifying factor, the glue but also the toolkit that can bring the required change.

    United Nations agencies should do a better job not only at mainstreaming sports in their programs but also enabling partnerships with professional sports as well, engaging and working with clubs and leagues to truly harness sports for the common good, not as just a nice “add on”, through the usual CSR projects, but as a key strategy for their success.

    ‘Our Common Agenda’

    The Our Common Agenda envisions a series of global gatherings and initiatives focused on different themes, including education and the future of job market and gender equality.

    Interestingly, within this blueprint, there is a commitment to do more to involve and engage youth meaningfully.

    The ideal goal for Secretary General Guterres would be a different United Nations that can do a much better job to prioritize youth’s needs and aspirations, putting them in the driving seat.

    It will certainly take a lot of effort to shift gear and move from words to deeds in making the United Nations more youth centric.

    Starting truly investing in sports, bringing them at the center of the development and social agenda in the developing as well higher income countries, is certainly one of the best ways to implement the Agenda 2030.

    It will bridge the generational divides and allow more and more youth to be in the “game” not as spectators but as key protagonists.

    If you think about, there is really no better way to get into actions in this decade.

     

    Pawan Ghimire is chairman – Cricket association of the blind Nepal and treasurer of World Blind Cricket Limited, UK

    Simone Galimberti is the Co-Founder of ENGAGE.

    This piece has been sourced from Inter Press Service

    For Two Years, Hundreds of Turtles at Varanasi Breeding Centre are Surviving Without Funds

    The turtle breeding centre at Sarnath in Varanasi has not received funds for the last two years, because of a decision to move the Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary (TWS) from Varanasi to the Bhadohi-Allahabad-Mirzapur region. There is speculation that the upcoming inland waterways are one of the reasons for moving the sanctuary.

    By Chandan Pandey   |  Translated by Abhishek Jha

    As many as 900 turtles at India’s first turtle breeding centre are surviving on borrowed resources. The government’s failure to release funds since the last two years has forced the centre’s management to borrow funds to meet the basic needs, including the daily feed of the turtles that are being bred at the centre. The breeding centre is located in Sarnath in Varanasi district of Uttar Pradesh and was set up in 1989. No government fund has come its way since the year 2020.

    According to officials, this delay in funds is happening because of confusion following a government order. In 2019, the state government took a decision to move the Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary out of Varanasi, after more than three decades of its existence. However, there was no clarity on whether, along with the sanctuary, the turtle breeding centre will also be shifted or will remain at its original place in Varanasi.

    Talking to Mongabay-Hindi, Divisional Forest Officer (DFO), Kashi Wildlife Division, Dinesh Kumar Singh, said, “Due to the relocation of turtle sanctuary from Varanasi to Mirzapur, there was confusion in the department, due to which funds (for the breeding centre) were not released in 2020. But now it has been made clear that even though the sanctuary has been shifted, the turtle breeding centre at Sarnath will remain at its original location.”

    Staff fending for turtles

    Confirming this, DFO, Social Forestry, Forest Division, Varanasi, Mahaveer Kaujalgi, said that since all the arrangements for breeding turtles are already in place, there’s no plan to relocate it (at the breeding centre).

    Talking about the paucity of funds, Dinesh Kumar Singh said, “The issue of non-availability of funds was raised during a departmental meeting. But due to a confusion, the budget has not been released so far. The allocated funds could not be released due to imposition of the model code of conduct during the UP elections. As soon as the file sectioning process starts, the funds for the turtle breeding centre are also likely to be released.”

    Over the last two years, the situation has reached a point where the staff is left with no option but to borrow resources to feed these turtles. At present, there are 909 turtles of Batagur dhongoka species (three-striped roofed turtle) at the centre. Of these, 712 are young ones and 197 are adults.

    According to forest guard Nishikant Sonkar, arrangements have to be made for turtle fodder (which includes gourd, carrot, radish, apple, cucumber, cucumber, calcium etc.). “Around 600-700 rupees are spent daily on the turtle feed,” he said.

    While the centre has an annual budget of about Rs. five lakh (Rs. 500,000), the unavailability of funds since the last two years has forced the staff to fend for the turtles.

    Why the move?

    Among the many reasons being cited by the government order, behind the relocation of the wildlife sanctuary to the Bhadohi-Allahabad-Mirzapur region, is human activities.

    Data suggests that about 40,000 turtles were released into the Ganges over the last three decades. However, in 2018, only 11 turtles were confirmed in the census conducted by the Forest Department of Varanasi. A source associated with the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) said, “The Institute had conducted the Rapid Ecological Survey of Ganga at the behest of the Government of India. The decision to de-notify the Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary was taken after finding negligible number of turtles in Varanasi.” The same justification was also given by the government when it decided to move the turtles away from their 30-year-old habitat in the Sanctuary.

    However, there is conjecture that the decision to move the sanctuary was to facilitate the central government’s ambitious inland waterways project that aims to make Varanasi one of the major hubs for cargo transportation along the river Ganges.

    Arvind Kumar, Assistant General Manager, Varanasi, Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI), told Mongabay-Hindi, “Human disruption was anticipated when the IWAI project came to Varanasi. Also, due to the construction of the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor, there was a strong possibility of human disturbance in the Ganges. Given these factors, when the government survey reflected a low turtle count in Varanasi, an area of 30 km between Mirzapur, Allahabad and Bhadohi was notified as (the new) turtle sanctuary, after denotifying the sanctuary in Varanasi.”

    National Waterway-1 runs through Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh to Haldia in West Bengal with a length of 1,620 km. Apart from Varanasi, multi-modal river water terminals have also been built at Sahibganj and Haldia where big ships anchor. Interestingly, the port in Varanasi near Ramnagar is barely 2.3 kilometers away from the Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary.

    Human interference

    A draft report on the assessment of the impact of multi-modal transport on the environment was brought out, where several stakeholders were consulted. Objecting to the waterways, Ajay Rai, former DFO of Kashi Van Mandal Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary, had raised five concerns.  He noted that regular shipping operations will adversely impact the turtles, the noise from water transport will affect the turtles, the silt that builds up during construction will cause problems for aquatic animals, the possibility of oil seepage from the ships will contaminate the water in the river Ganga and the management of solid waste should be done in a scientific manner.

    B.D. Tripathi, President and Professor of Mahamana Malviya Ganga Research Center of Banaras Hindu University, told Mongabay-India, “The location of the Turtle Sanctuary in Varanasi was not good and turtles were not able to survive here due to human interference. Besides this, sand deposits on the right side of the Ganges were increasing rapidly, forming sand dunes everywhere. All this resulted in an increase in the pressure of river current on the ghats. Due to an increase in soil erosion, the Turtle Sanctuary was denotified from here and moved to the Prayagraj, Mirzapur and Bhadohi region.”

    In view of these objections, efforts were also made to reduce the negative impacts of the waterways. The environmental impact assessment reports prepared for National Waterway-1 has directed that in order to save the flora and fauna of the Ganges from the impact of the project, only one or two ships will pass through the Turtle Wildlife Sanctuary every hour. The ships need to run at a speed of five kilometers per hour. The report said that 110-140 decibels (dB) of noise would be generated at this speed. The report further stated that the noise level for change in behaviour of turtles is 150 dB, which is higher than the noise generated by ships. Therefore, the effect on the behavioural responses of turtles is estimated to be negligible, it noted.

    Changing environment

    Researcher Gaura Chandra Das of Wildlife Institute of India explained, “In the year 2018, the Wildlife Institute of India had counted turtles for about a month in a total radius of 7 km from Rajghat in Varanasi to Ramnagar. During the census, only 11 turtles were found. In comparison, more turtles were found in the surrounding areas. These areas include Chandravati, Dhakwa, Sarsol and Sujabad. He said that along with turtles, different species of fish, dolphins, otters and migratory birds also easily survive in the turtle sanctuary.

    Das agreed that human disturbance in Varanasi’s Turtle Sanctuary and the vibration and sound generated by shipping activity are major reasons for the turtles to move away from their habitat. He explained that sound is heard with 10 times more intensity in water than in air. Being peace-loving, turtles prefer to leave such areas.

    Another researcher associated with the Wildlife Institute of India, Ashok Panda, said that in the last 30 years, more than 40,000 turtles had been released into the Ganges. He said that the turtle population in the Ganges has been showing a declining trend. The main cause of habitat degradation are sand mining and river farming. Due to this, the turtles do not get a suitable place to sunbathe and lay eggs. Apart from this, water pollution and construction of dams on rivers also cause disturbance for the turtles.

    Trafficking and by-catch

    According to Panda, a total of 13 types of turtles are found in the Ganges. Of these, 10 species are endangered, while three are on the verge of extinction. Ten out of these 13 species of turtles are included under the Indian Wildlife Act 1972 Schedule I, which covers endangered species that are granted protection from poaching, killing, trading etc. A person is liable to the harshest penalties for violation of the law under this Schedule.

    The sharp decline in the number of turtles due to human disturbance in all rivers across India has also led to shrinking egg count. Turtles getting caught in fishnets, especially those that survive on fish, is another reason for the population fall.

    Additionally, turtles are also smuggled from north India and sent to other parts of India and other Asian countries.

    In the last nine years alone, the Varanasi police has seized more than 7,000 turtles being trafficked. Forest guard Nishikant Sonkar pointed out, “From time to time, turtles are confiscated by the police and handed over to us. The forest department, after treating them, releases them into the Ganges with permission.” Sonkar said that the data pertaining to the number of turtles handed over to the Turtle Breeding Centre by the police over the years is also available here.

     

    This article was first published on Mongabay-India 

    Image:  Chandan Pandey

     

     

    UN Climate Report: It’s ‘Now or Never’ to Limit Global Warming to 1.5 degrees

    Providing the scientific proof to back up that damning assessment, the IPCC report – written by hundreds of leading scientists and agreed by 195 countries – noted that greenhouse gas emissions generated by human activity, have increased since 2010 “across all major sectors globally”.

    “It’s now or never, if we want to limit global warming to 1.5°C (2.7°F); without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, it will be impossible,” said Jim Skea, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III, which released the latest flagship UN report on climate change out Monday, with scientists arguing that it’s ‘now or never’ to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees.

    The report indicated that harmful carbon emissions from 2010-2019 have never been higher in human history. This is proof that the world is on a “fast track” to disaster, United Nations Secretary General António Guterres warned.

    Global temperatures will stabilise when carbon dioxide emissions reach net zero. For 1.5C (2.7F), this means achieving net zero carbon dioxide emissions globally in the early 2050s; for 2C (3.6°F), it is in the early 2070s, the IPCC report states.

    “This assessment shows that limiting warming to around 2C (3.6F) still requires global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by a quarter by 2030.”

    Reacting to the latest findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN Secretary-General insisted that unless governments everywhere reassess their energy policies, the world will be uninhabitable.

    His comments reflected the IPCC’s insistence that all countries must reduce their fossil fuel use substantially, extend access to electricity, improve energy efficiency and increase the use of alternative fuels, such as hydrogen.

    Unless action is taken soon, some major cities will be under water, Mr. Guterres said in a video message, which also forecast “unprecedented heatwaves, terrifying storms, widespread water shortages and the extinction of a million species of plants and animals”.
    Horror story

    The UN chief added: “This is not fiction or exaggeration. It is what science tells us will result from our current energy policies. We are on a pathway to global warming of more than double the 1.5-degree (Celsius, or 2.7-degrees Fahreinheit) limit” that was agreed in Paris in 2015.

    Providing the scientific proof to back up that damning assessment, the IPCC report – written by hundreds of leading scientists and agreed by 195 countries – noted that greenhouse gas emissions generated by human activity, have increased since 2010 “across all major sectors globally”.

    Urban issue

    An increasing share of emissions can be attributed to towns and cities, the report’s authors continued, adding just as worryingly, that emissions reductions clawed back in the last decade or so “have been less than emissions increases, from rising global activity levels in industry, energy supply, transport, agriculture and buildings”.

    Striking a more positive note – and insisting that it is still possible to halve emissions by 2030 – the IPCC urged governments to ramp up action to curb emissions.

    The UN body also welcomed the significant decrease in the cost of renewable energy sources since 2010, by as much as 85 per cent for solar and wind energy, and batteries.

    Encouraging climate action

    “We are at a crossroads. The decisions we make now can secure a liveable future,” said IPCC Chair Hoesung Lee. “I am encouraged by climate action being taken in many countries. There are policies, regulations and market instruments that are proving effective. If these are scaled up and applied more widely and equitably, they can support deep emissions reductions and stimulate innovation.”

    To limit global warming to around 1.5C (2.7°F), the IPCC report insisted that global greenhouse gas emissions would have to peak “before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43 per cent by 2030”.

    Methane would also need to be reduced by about a third, the report’s authors continued, adding that even if this was achieved, it was “almost inevitable that we will temporarily exceed this temperature threshold”, although the world “could  return to below it by the end of the century”

    Policy base

    A great deal of importance is attached to IPCC assessments because they provide governments with scientific information that they can use to develop climate policies.

    They also play a key role in international negotiations to tackle climate change.

    Among the sustainable and emissions-busting solutions that are available to governments, the IPCC report emphasised that rethinking how cities and other urban areas function in future could help significantly in mitigating the worst effects of climate change.

    “These (reductions) can be achieved through lower energy consumption (such as by creating compact, walkable cities), electrification of transport in combination with low-emission energy sources, and enhanced carbon uptake and storage using nature,” the report suggested. “There are options for established, rapidly growing and new cities,” it said.

    Echoing that message, IPCC Working Group III Co-Chair, Priyadarshi Shukla, insisted that “the right policies, infrastructure and technology…to enable changes to our lifestyles and behaviour, can result in a 40 to 70 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. “The evidence also shows that these lifestyle changes can improve our health and wellbeing.”

    Cow Dung Fires Linked to Black Fungus Epidemic in India

    Medical researchers say cow dung is rich in black fungus spores, which, when released through smoke from cow dung fires spread widely. Cow dung is widely used in India as fuel, for medicines and in rituals.

    By Ranjit Devraj  /  SciDev.Net

    Cow dung, widely used as a fuel and in rituals in India, is likely behind an epidemic of black fungus that killed or maimed thousands of patients treated in the country for COVID-19 in 2021, say medical researchers.

    Mucormycosis, a dangerous infection caused by Mucorales fungi, has an overall mortality rate of 54 per cent, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In May 2021, mucormycosis was declared an epidemic in India — during a devastating second wave of COVID-19 — with the country accounting for 71 per cent of all Mucorales infection cases worldwide.

    The country had recorded 51,775 cases of mucormycosis as of November last year. Mucorales, a coprophilous (dung-loving) group of fungi, thrives on the excrement of herbivores and India has the world’s largest population of bovine cattle, counting 300 million in its inventory.

    The paper published April in mBio, a journal of the American Society for Microbiology, hypothesised that “Mucorales-rich cow excrement, given its use in multiple Indian rituals and practices, especially during the pandemic, probably played a key role in India’s COVID-19- associated mucormycosis epidemic”.

    Increased fungal spores

    Jessy Skaria, an author of the paper and an independent researcher from Houston, Texas, tells SciDev.Net that the unusually high incidence of COVID-19- associated mucormycosis in India was attributed by most physicians and researchers to a combination of SARS-Cov-2 viral infection with diabetes and treatment using steroids.

    “However, since the same factors existed in other countries as well, we looked at unique local causes in India that could increase exposure to Mucorales spores, such as through fumes from burning cow dung,” says Skaria.

    “Increased fungal spore burden in the Indian environment has been demonstrated in a recent multi-centre study which showed the burden of Mucorales in areas close to hospitals to be as high as 51.8 per cent.”

    Fungal spores disperse widely through the smoke of burning biomass, so the practise of burning Mucorales-rich cow dung and crop stubble to dispose of it may lead to Mucorales spores being released into the environment, she explains.

    “This could potentially explain India’s disproportionate case burden of mucormycosis at all times, even before the pandemic,” says Skaria. She cited studies suggesting that Mucorales could be detected in 14 per cent of patients in India’s intensive care units and that an average of 65,500 deaths a year were attributable to mucormycosis.

    “Our hypothesis is also based on pioneering work that proved that fungal spores could travel long distances in smoke from biomass fires,” she adds.

    Donkey dung too

    Cow excreta is a part of traditional life in India and used as an ingredient in many traditional ayurvedic medicines. Common rituals in parts of India include applying cow dung on bodies, drinking cow urine, and burning and inhaling cow dung fumes as a form of ritual purification during festivals, prayers, or cremations, the paper said.

    Considered a sacred animal, cows are not slaughtered in many Indian states.

    “Notable exceptions are Kerala and West Bengal where the incidence of mucormycosis was far lower than in Maharashtra and Gujarat where the slaughter of cattle is strictly banned and where the use of cow excreta for fuels and rituals is popular,” says Skaria. “It’s hugely pertinent that in Kerala where there is no ban on slaughtering cows and no taboo on eating beef… and where cow dung is almost never used as fuel…the incidence of mucormycosis was found to be low.”

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, political and religious rhetoric inspired many Indians to liberally use cow dung and urine to prevent or treat COVID-19, including through mass fumigations with smouldering cow dung cakes, the paper observed.

    Similarly, in Iran an unusual spike in mucormycosis cases during the pandemic could potentially be attributed to the burning of donkey dung to produce “anbarnesa smoke”, a traditional medicine, the paper said.

    Plausible hypothesis

    “To establish the role of herbivore dung in the causation of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis, case control studies, genetic (phylogenetic) studies and other aerosol viability analysis of Mucorales spores, post-burning, is critical,” Rodney Rohde, chair and professor of clinical laboratory science at Texas State University, tells SciDev.Net.

    “However, the hypothesis has strong support based on the epidemiological and case data that is occurring in India. The burning of cow dung is a possible vehicle for spore distribution and one that needs examining to help further the understanding of the ongoing and dangerously high prevalence of mucormycosis in India.”

    Judy Stone, a US-based infectious disease and clinical research specialist, tells SciDev.Net: “Exposure to Mucorales spores in cow dung is a very plausible hypothesis — I think it is pretty clear that there is more to the mucormycosis epidemic than diabetes and steroids. Other countries (e.g. China) have a much higher prevalence of diabetes, yet have not had the overwhelming numbers of patients with mucormycosis.

    “I hope that this hypothesis, now embraced by academic physicians and published in a peer-reviewed journal, will finally prompt further study by aerobiologists and other scientists in India.”

     

    This piece has been sourced from SciDev.Net. It has been produced by SciDev.Net’s Asia & Pacific desk.

    Image: Hippopx, licensed to use under Creative Commons Zero – CC0