More

    Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They Handled COVID-19?

    HealthCOVID-19Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They...
    - Advertisment -

    Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They Handled COVID-19?

    A new research study offers an analysis of the pandemic response of 91 nations between January and December 2020 and has determined that certain country characteristics shaped COVID-19 outcomes.

    Remember the COVID-19 fiascos across the globe? Whether it is Donald Trump’s anti-vaccine tirade; or the runaway infections in Xi’s China or Recep Erdogan’s Turkey; or the handling of COVID-19 by the Narendra Modi administration or Boris Johnson’s disregard for COVID rules – the world seems in a hurry to forget how strongmen handled COVID-19.

    Likewise, the world also seems to be in a hurry to forget how strong women leaders handled the COVID-19 pandemic.

    But now, a research published on Thursday as an open access journal on Nature Portfolio’s Scientific Reports says that countries with female leaders recorded 40 per cent fewer COVID-19 deaths than nations governed by men

    - Advertisement -

    According to this paper published by researchers at the University of Queensland, the difference was stark – strong women leaders outperformed strongmen by miles.

    Associate Professor Kelvin Tan from University of Queensland’s Business School says the statistic is a key finding of a study into the impacts different country characteristics, such as leadership, have had on COVID-19 infection and death rates.

    “Countries where women were at the head of government outperformed countries with male leadership, with an average 39.9 per cent fewer confirmed COVID-19 deaths,” Dr Tan said.

    “This figure can be attributed to female leaders taking quick and decisive action, a broader view of the wider impact on society and being more receptive to innovative thinking.

    “We found female leaders tend to act promptly and decisively and are more risk-averse towards the loss of human life, which play an essential role in pandemic prevention and outcomes,” he said.

    Importance of prevention

    The study analysed the pandemic response of 91 nations between January and December 2020 and determined that certain country characteristics shaped COVID-19 outcomes.

    Dr Tan said many countries adopted similar approaches to contain the spread of COVID-19, but there were drastic differences in morbidity and mortality, even among those with similar socio-economic conditions and political backgrounds like Australia and New Zealand.

    “As of 31 December 2020, although the population of Australia was only 5 times that of NZ, Australia had reported around 13 times more infections and 36 times the number of deaths than the numbers reported by New Zealand,” he said.

    The study found gender ratio, population density, urbanisation and political corruption all intensified the severity of a country’s pandemic experience.

    Conversely, female leadership, education, religious diversity and public trust in government were found to reduce rates of infection and death.

    “We’ve identified a set of predetermined, country-specific characteristics that have significantly influenced the outcomes of the pandemic and we hope policymakers use them to manage risk during future health emergencies,” Dr Tan said.

    “Our findings highlight the importance of prevention, rather than treatment, in reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.”

    The work of Jacinda Ardern or Angela Merkel or Finland’s Sanna Marin is rarely spoken of.

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    India: First Carbon Credits Reach Over 2,500 Punjab and Haryana Paddy Farmers for Climate-Smart Practices

    As more credits from post-2022 cohorts move through the audit pipeline and the company scales toward its one-million-credit target.

    Bangladesh: Clock Ticking on Ganges Water Treaty as 2026 Deadline Looms

    Without renewed cooperation grounded in updated science, transparent data and mutual restraint, the Ganges risks becoming a source of friction rather than a shared lifeline. 

    Sri Lanka Urges End to Indefinite UN Human Rights Mandates at Geneva Council

    The discussion reflects deeper tensions between the imperative of accountability for past violations and the sovereign claim of states to lead their own reconciliation processes.

    China Sets Ambitious 725 Million Tonne Grain Target by 2030 to Fortify Food Security

    China has placed food security at the centre of its national strategy, setting a binding target to raise annual grain production capacity to 725 million metric tonnes by 2030.
    - Advertisement -

    Rivers Swallow Land Five Times the Size of Dhaka in Five Decades

    Gaibandha faces the largest land loss among the Jamuna sites, while Kurigram risks the greatest settlement area.

    Sri Lanka Seeks India’s Backing in War on Indian Ocean Drug Trafficking

    The appeal came during a high-level meeting with visiting Indian Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh on 9 September 2026, the first such visit by an Indian defence minister in 38 years.

    Must read

    India: First Carbon Credits Reach Over 2,500 Punjab and Haryana Paddy Farmers for Climate-Smart Practices

    As more credits from post-2022 cohorts move through the audit pipeline and the company scales toward its one-million-credit target.

    Bangladesh: Clock Ticking on Ganges Water Treaty as 2026 Deadline Looms

    Without renewed cooperation grounded in updated science, transparent data and mutual restraint, the Ganges risks becoming a source of friction rather than a shared lifeline. 
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you