More

    Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They Handled COVID-19?

    HealthCOVID-19Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They...
    - Advertisment -

    Strongmen Versus Strong Women – How Differently Did They Handled COVID-19?

    A new research study offers an analysis of the pandemic response of 91 nations between January and December 2020 and has determined that certain country characteristics shaped COVID-19 outcomes.

    Remember the COVID-19 fiascos across the globe? Whether it is Donald Trump’s anti-vaccine tirade; or the runaway infections in Xi’s China or Recep Erdogan’s Turkey; or the handling of COVID-19 by the Narendra Modi administration or Boris Johnson’s disregard for COVID rules – the world seems in a hurry to forget how strongmen handled COVID-19.

    Likewise, the world also seems to be in a hurry to forget how strong women leaders handled the COVID-19 pandemic.

    But now, a research published on Thursday as an open access journal on Nature Portfolio’s Scientific Reports says that countries with female leaders recorded 40 per cent fewer COVID-19 deaths than nations governed by men

    - Advertisement -

    According to this paper published by researchers at the University of Queensland, the difference was stark – strong women leaders outperformed strongmen by miles.

    Associate Professor Kelvin Tan from University of Queensland’s Business School says the statistic is a key finding of a study into the impacts different country characteristics, such as leadership, have had on COVID-19 infection and death rates.

    “Countries where women were at the head of government outperformed countries with male leadership, with an average 39.9 per cent fewer confirmed COVID-19 deaths,” Dr Tan said.

    “This figure can be attributed to female leaders taking quick and decisive action, a broader view of the wider impact on society and being more receptive to innovative thinking.

    “We found female leaders tend to act promptly and decisively and are more risk-averse towards the loss of human life, which play an essential role in pandemic prevention and outcomes,” he said.

    Importance of prevention

    The study analysed the pandemic response of 91 nations between January and December 2020 and determined that certain country characteristics shaped COVID-19 outcomes.

    Dr Tan said many countries adopted similar approaches to contain the spread of COVID-19, but there were drastic differences in morbidity and mortality, even among those with similar socio-economic conditions and political backgrounds like Australia and New Zealand.

    “As of 31 December 2020, although the population of Australia was only 5 times that of NZ, Australia had reported around 13 times more infections and 36 times the number of deaths than the numbers reported by New Zealand,” he said.

    The study found gender ratio, population density, urbanisation and political corruption all intensified the severity of a country’s pandemic experience.

    Conversely, female leadership, education, religious diversity and public trust in government were found to reduce rates of infection and death.

    “We’ve identified a set of predetermined, country-specific characteristics that have significantly influenced the outcomes of the pandemic and we hope policymakers use them to manage risk during future health emergencies,” Dr Tan said.

    “Our findings highlight the importance of prevention, rather than treatment, in reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.”

    The work of Jacinda Ardern or Angela Merkel or Finland’s Sanna Marin is rarely spoken of.

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    Thali Costs Climb in June on Vegetable and Fuel Price Surge, says CRISIL

    June 2026’s thali cost increases highlight the interplay of domestic weather, global supply issues, and structural factors in India’s food inflation.

    Unpaid Burden: Sri Lanka’s Women Work 8.5 Months a Year for Free

    Experts advocate treating care as essential social infrastructure. Expanding services, redistributing unpaid work through policy, and challenging norms that sideline educated women could unlock significant gains.

    Deadly Monsoon Fury: Bangladesh Battles Widespread Flooding Crisis

    This 2026 event arrives after earlier haor region floods earlier in the year, underscoring recurring pressures. Migration to urban centres and climate adaptation efforts remain critical long-term challenges.

    Sri Lanka Targets Poverty Eradication: Aswesuma Programme Set for Phase-Out by 2030

    Launched in 2023 amid the aftermath of Sri Lanka’s unprecedented economic turmoil, Aswesuma represented a targeted overhaul of the country’s social protection system.
    - Advertisement -

    Civil Society Rallies Behind Bengaluru Street Vendors: “Don’t Sacrifice Livelihoods for Footpaths”

    Street vendors embody the resilience of India’s informal economy. Their struggle highlights the need for policies that listen to the voices of the working poor rather than displacing them in the name of progress.

    India: SMAM Unleashes Farm Mechanization: Over Rs. 6,748 Crore Released, 15.75 Lakh Machines Distributed

    With agriculture employing a large workforce yet facing productivity pressures, SMAM aligns with national goal of doubling farmers’ income.

    Must read

    Thali Costs Climb in June on Vegetable and Fuel Price Surge, says CRISIL

    June 2026’s thali cost increases highlight the interplay of domestic weather, global supply issues, and structural factors in India’s food inflation.

    Unpaid Burden: Sri Lanka’s Women Work 8.5 Months a Year for Free

    Experts advocate treating care as essential social infrastructure. Expanding services, redistributing unpaid work through policy, and challenging norms that sideline educated women could unlock significant gains.
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you