More

    Two Decades On, Pakistan Still Rebuilding from 2005 Earthquake’s Ruins

    EnvironmentClimate changeTwo Decades On, Pakistan Still Rebuilding from 2005 Earthquake’s...
    - Advertisment -

    Two Decades On, Pakistan Still Rebuilding from 2005 Earthquake’s Ruins

    Despite billions invested in reconstruction and ongoing government promises, thousands still reside in temporary shelters, and numerous public buildings, particularly schools and hospitals, remain unrebuilt.

    Twenty years after one of Pakistan’s deadliest natural disasters, the scars of the 2005 earthquake that devastated Pakistan occupied Kashmir (POK) and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) remain deeply etched in both the land and the lives of survivors. Despite billions spent on reconstruction and repeated pledges by successive governments, thousands continue to live in makeshift shelters, while hundreds of public buildings, especially schools and hospitals, remain un-rebuilt.

    At 8:52 AM on October 8, 2005, a powerful 7.6-magnitude quake struck northern Pakistan, flattening entire towns across Muzaffarabad, Bagh, Balakot, and Mansehra. The disaster claimed over 80,000 lives, left more than 3.5 million people homeless, and destroyed an estimated 600,000 homes and 6,000 schools. Two decades later, the ruins still tell a story of unfinished recovery.

    Lingering Scars and Unfulfilled Promises

    The physical and emotional wounds of that morning are far from healed. In Muzaffarabad, residents of some of the worst-hit neighbourhoods say life has never truly returned to normal. “We lost everything – our homes, our schools, our memories,” says 65-year-old Muhammad Ashraf, a survivor who still lives in temporary housing. “Governments came and went, but promises of rebuilding never fully materialised.”

    According to the Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority (ERRA), nearly 90 per cent of the planned reconstruction projects have been completed. Yet, local reports indicate that over 1,000 schools in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are still awaiting rebuilding, forcing children to study in unsafe or makeshift classrooms. Dozens of public hospitals also remain partially functional, lacking the modern facilities envisioned in the post-quake master plans.

    - Advertisement -

    In its latest statement, ERRA acknowledged delays caused by “funding constraints, administrative hurdles, and natural calamities.” However, local civil society groups argue that bureaucratic inefficiency and political neglect have been the real obstacles. “Rehabilitation was never treated as a long-term national priority,” says development activist Sanaullah Khan from Balakot. “The momentum faded after the initial aid dried up.”

    Government Vows Resilience and Preparedness

    On the twentieth anniversary of the disaster, Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif led solemn commemorations, paying tribute to victims and vowing to strengthen disaster preparedness. In separate messages, both leaders stressed the need to build a “resilient Pakistan” capable of withstanding future calamities in an era of intensifying climate risks.

    “The 2005 earthquake was a turning point that taught us the importance of national resilience,” the prime minister said. “We have made progress, but much remains to be done to ensure that every school, hospital, and home is built to withstand disasters.”

    Officials also highlighted the role of early warning systems, updated building codes, and community awareness campaigns. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) announced plans to expand digital monitoring networks and enhance coordination among provincial disaster management agencies.

    Yet for many survivors, such pledges ring hollow. “Every year, we hear about new projects and new plans,” says 50-year-old widow Rukhsana Bibi from Bagh. “But when rain leaks into our tents, when our children study without walls, we realise that resilience remains only a slogan.”

    A Tale of Two Recoveries

    The reconstruction experience has been uneven. While urban areas such as Muzaffarabad’s city centre now feature new government buildings, bridges, and roads, remote mountain villages tell a different story. In Neelum Valley, many families rebuilt their homes using their own limited resources, often without adherence to quake-resistant standards. Aid agencies warn that such structures remain highly vulnerable to future tremors.

    Education infrastructure has been among the hardest hit. The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa education department recently confirmed that nearly 1,000 schools affected by the earthquake still lack permanent structures. Many are run in tents or temporary sheds, exposing children to extreme weather. “Two decades is too long for children to wait for safe classrooms,” said a senior education official quoted in The Express Tribune.

    Similarly, hundreds of health facilities that were meant to be rebuilt with international assistance remain incomplete. Doctors Without Borders and other NGOs that once operated temporary clinics have since withdrawn, leaving residents dependent on under-equipped local centres.

    Voices of Resilience

    Despite the long struggle, stories of courage and community rebuilding abound. In Balakot, volunteers who lost families in the quake now lead disaster preparedness training for local youth. “We don’t want another generation to suffer as we did,” says trainer Khalid Mehmood. “Awareness and preparedness are our best defence.”

    In Muzaffarabad, women-led groups have taken charge of reconstruction in their neighbourhoods, building quake-resistant homes with technical guidance from NGOs. Their work has inspired a new culture of self-reliance. “If we wait for the government, nothing moves,” says Fatima Noor, a community leader. “So we decided to rebuild our future with our own hands.” Experts say Pakistan must learn from the unfinished lessons of 2005 as it faces more frequent natural disasters linked to climate change. “Earthquake resilience is not just about rebuilding structures – it’s about building systems that endure,” says Dr. Aisha Qureshi, a disaster management specialist. “The gap between policy and practice remains Pakistan’s biggest vulnerability.”

    - Advertisement -

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Latest news

    China Sets Ambitious 725 Million Tonne Grain Target by 2030 to Fortify Food Security

    China has placed food security at the centre of its national strategy, setting a binding target to raise annual grain production capacity to 725 million metric tonnes by 2030.

    Rivers Swallow Land Five Times the Size of Dhaka in Five Decades

    Gaibandha faces the largest land loss among the Jamuna sites, while Kurigram risks the greatest settlement area.

    Sri Lanka Seeks India’s Backing in War on Indian Ocean Drug Trafficking

    The appeal came during a high-level meeting with visiting Indian Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh on 9 September 2026, the first such visit by an Indian defence minister in 38 years.

    Panama Canal Slashes Daily Ship Transits as El Niño Drought Tightens Grip

    For global trade, the message is clear: the shortest route between the Atlantic and Pacific is no longer a reliable constant.
    - Advertisement -

    Sri Lanka Braces for Record El Niño Threat to Food, Power and Forex Stability

    El Niño itself cannot be prevented. The scale of its impact on Sri Lanka, however, will be determined by the quality and speed of the national response.

    Nepal Seeks Grants for $4-5 Billion Flood Recovery as Soft Loans Loom Large

    The coming weeks will be critical. Once the PDNA is complete, the government intends to convene donors and present a clear financing strategy.

    Must read

    China Sets Ambitious 725 Million Tonne Grain Target by 2030 to Fortify Food Security

    China has placed food security at the centre of its national strategy, setting a binding target to raise annual grain production capacity to 725 million metric tonnes by 2030.

    Rivers Swallow Land Five Times the Size of Dhaka in Five Decades

    Gaibandha faces the largest land loss among the Jamuna sites, while Kurigram risks the greatest settlement area.
    - Advertisement -

    More from the sectionRELATED
    Recommended to you