More

    Imran Khan Appeals for Global Support Amid Pakistan’s Political Turmoil

    Questions remain regarding the article’s authenticity, as it is unclear whether Khan personally authored it and how it was delivered to the magazine. Nevertheless, its content has stirred considerable political debate both domestically and internationally.

    Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has made a passionate appeal to the international community, particularly the United States, to reaffirm its commitment to democracy, human rights, and regional stability. The appeal, published in an article under Khan’s name in Time magazine, comes as the former premier remains incarcerated on charges he claims are politically motivated.

    In the article titled ‘From Prison, Imran Khan Reminds Us to Pay Attention to Pakistan’, Khan congratulated US President Donald Trump on his “political comeback” and expressed hope that the United States would work with Pakistan to foster economic partnerships, promote stability, and prevent conditions that lead to conflict and extremism.

    However, questions remain regarding the article’s authenticity, as it is unclear whether Khan personally authored it and how it was delivered to the magazine. Nevertheless, its content has stirred considerable political debate both domestically and internationally.

    Pakistan’s Political Crisis

    Khan used the article to highlight what he described as an ongoing erosion of democracy in Pakistan. He labelled the current period as one of the most challenging in the country’s history and stressed that his imprisonment was part of a broader attempt to suppress democratic principles.

    “My struggle is not personal; it is about the survival of democracy,” he wrote. “A politically unstable Pakistan threatens regional security, disrupts trade, and weakens global democratic values.”

    Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party has faced significant setbacks in recent months, with its leaders arrested, party offices raided, and electoral participation curtailed. He urged the international community to recognize the urgency of the crisis and take steps to support democratic institutions in Pakistan.

    Allegations of Misuse of Anti-Terror Efforts

    One of the most striking claims in Khan’s article was his criticism of the Pakistani government’s counterterrorism efforts. He accused the ruling administration of diverting resources meant for combating terrorism to target PTI members and political opponents instead.

    “The government has abandoned crucial counterterrorism measures, allowing regions like Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan to become hotbeds of terrorist activity,” he alleged. “Military campaigns against political opponents have taken precedence over national security.”

    Khan also condemned the state of the judiciary, asserting that it had been reduced to a tool of political persecution. He argued that the legal system was being weaponized to silence dissent and maintain power.

    Political Reactions and Criticism

    Khan’s article sparked strong reactions from the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). Senator Irfan Siddiqui, chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, dismissed the article as a misleading and irresponsible attempt to tarnish Pakistan’s global reputation.

    Speaking on DawnNews TV’s Doosra Rukh, Siddiqui criticized PTI for its inconsistent political strategies, arguing that the party was simultaneously seeking alliances while calling for civil disobedience.

    “They are writing letters and publishing explosive articles abroad while refusing to engage in constructive political dialogue,” Siddiqui said. “PTI’s approach is unpredictable because their directives come directly from Imran Khan. Even PTI’s negotiation committee was caught off guard when Khan suddenly halted all talks.”

    The PML-N senator also rejected Khan’s claim that he was offered house arrest instead of imprisonment, stating that no such offer was ever made. “If Imran Khan insists that such an offer existed, he should clarify who made it and when,” Siddiqui said in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

    The Broader Impact

    Khan’s international outreach, particularly through Time magazine, is seen as an effort to bring Pakistan’s political crisis to the attention of Western allies. His narrative—framing his incarceration as a battle for democracy rather than a personal struggle—seeks to garner global support at a time when Pakistan faces economic challenges and increasing security threats.

    The timing of the article is also significant. With Pakistan’s general elections approaching, Khan remains a central figure despite his imprisonment. His appeal to the global community may shape both domestic and international perspectives on Pakistan’s democratic trajectory.

    As political tensions escalate, the future of Pakistan’s democracy remains uncertain. Khan’s PTI continues to face restrictions, and negotiations between the opposition and the government appear to be at a standstill. The international community’s response to Khan’s plea will likely influence the country’s political landscape in the coming months.

    While Khan’s critics accuse him of undermining Pakistan’s reputation on the world stage, his supporters see his efforts as a necessary step to restore democratic norms. Whether his appeal for global intervention will yield tangible results remains to be seen.

    Bangladesh’s Prospects for Democracy: Challenges and Strategies

    As BNP gears up for elections, a new political entity is emerging from the remnants of the 2024 uprising. However, internal divisions have already surfaced within the Jatiya Nagorik Committee, the group spearheading this initiative.

    Bangladesh’s political scene remains in flux as the country braces for the upcoming national elections. The opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) recently held an extended meeting to strategise its electoral approach and reinforce party discipline. Party Chairperson Khaleda Zia, addressing the gathering virtually, warned against “fascist collaborators” undermining democratic progress. With BNP’s grassroots leaders actively involved in discussions, the party seeks to devise a roadmap for the future while navigating internal discipline challenges and external political pressures.

    At the extended meeting, held adjacent to the LD Hall of the National Parliament building, Khaleda Zia emphasised the necessity of national unity. She called upon party leaders and activists to align with the people in resisting conspiracies aimed at derailing democratic gains.

    “The people of Bangladesh, especially the youth, are eagerly awaiting a positive democratic transformation,” she asserted, urging BNP members to set aside personal differences and work toward a greater national good.

    Zia also invoked the legacy of BNP’s founder, the late President Ziaur Rahman, encouraging members to honor past sacrifices by maintaining party discipline and unity. Her statements reinforced the BNP’s narrative of being the defender of democratic values in the country.

    BNP’s Extended Meeting: Key Focus Areas

    The extended meeting, which drew thousands of leaders from across the country, focused on critical political issues, including post-August 5 developments, the upcoming 13th parliamentary election, and party discipline. Acting Chairman Tarique Rahman, who joined virtually, presided over the event, while BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir and senior leadership were present.

    A senior BNP leader, speaking anonymously, emphasised that the grassroots members’ voices would be central in shaping the party’s election strategy. He noted concerns about internal indiscipline and the party’s approach to the next national election. The meeting also highlighted BNP’s stance on election timing, rejecting any potential delays under the guise of reforms.

    Nomination and Electoral Strategy

    BNP’s leadership reiterated that nominations for the upcoming elections would be granted to candidates who actively participated in past movements and contributed to the party’s cause. The meeting provided a platform for grassroots leaders to share their views on potential candidates, their local influence, and their commitment to BNP’s objectives.

    Standing Committee member Iqbal Hasan Mahmud underscored the significance of grassroots involvement in election preparations. “These leaders have firsthand knowledge of local political dynamics and public sentiments. Their input is essential for assessing the party’s strength and shaping future strategies,” he said.

    Party insiders suggest that BNP will intensify street campaigns if any external interference in the election timeline occurs. The meeting also featured discussions on strengthening BNP’s local presence and enhancing coordination with allied parties.

    Several grassroots leaders were also invited to the meet, reflecting the BNP’s efforts to engage with its grassroots and recalibrate its political strategy based on local insights. The grassroots leaders expressed their perspectives on BNP’s challenges and opportunities:

    • Zakir Hossain Bablu, convener of Mymensingh district BNP (south), emphasised the importance of assessing BNP’s local politics and strengthening organisational activities.
    • SM Shafiqul Alam Mona, president of Khulna metropolitan BNP, noted that discussions on enhancing party structures ahead of the national election were a priority.
    • Abdul Quiyum Chowdhury, president of Sylhet district BNP, highlighted the need for guidance from senior leaders to navigate political hurdles.
    • Mamun Mahmud, Narayanganj district BNP Convener, stressed the importance of direct communication with the party’s high command regarding local political realities.

    Political Realignments and the Rise of a New Party

    As BNP gears up for elections, a new political entity is emerging from the remnants of the 2024 uprising. However, internal divisions have already surfaced within the Jatiya Nagorik Committee, the group spearheading this initiative.

    Several former leaders of Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami, announced their withdrawal from the new party over leadership disputes. Among them, Ali Ahsan Zonaed and Rafe Salman Rifat publicly distanced themselves, citing concerns over the selection process. Zonaed criticised the leadership structure as “neither democratic nor inclusive,” while Rafe remarked that politics is a “long race” requiring patience and strategic endurance.

    These resignations came amid a controversy regarding the involvement of former Shibir leaders in the new party’s leadership. Disagreements over key positions led to delays in the party’s launch, initially scheduled for February 28. The Nagorik Committee faced internal conflicts over who would assume the crucial post of member secretary, with different factions pushing for their preferred candidates.

    Despite these setbacks, the new party is set to be unveiled at a rally on Manik Mia Avenue, where its name will be officially disclosed. The party leadership structure is still being negotiated, with potential roles such as chief coordinator, senior joint convener, and spokesperson under discussion. Observers believe that this new political force could reshape Bangladesh’s opposition landscape.

    BNP’s Outreach to Youth Activists

    BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, addressing a book unveiling event at the Ekushey Book Fair, urged the younger generation — especially those who participated in the July uprising — to act responsibly in ensuring democratic change.

    “Those who were part of the movement have a responsibility to act with care and responsibility,” he said. He emphasised the importance of constructive dialogue and unity in securing an acceptable and neutral election by December.

    BNP has been increasingly reaching out to young activists and university students, recognising their role as a crucial voter base. With social media playing an instrumental role in political mobilisation, BNP leaders are exploring ways to harness digital platforms to engage with the youth. The party has also launched online campaigns to highlight its policies and expose alleged government misdeeds.

    The Role of International Observers and Election Fairness

    As Bangladesh moves toward elections, international stakeholders are closely monitoring the political landscape. The United Nations, European Union, and other global organisations have called for free, fair, and inclusive elections. BNP has sought international attention on what it describes as electoral manipulation by the ruling party.

    While the ruling Awami League insists that the election will be conducted transparently, opposition parties argue that state machinery is being used to suppress dissent. BNP leaders have urged foreign observers to scrutinise election proceedings, emphasising the need for neutrality in election oversight.

    The Road Ahead

    As Bangladesh approaches the national elections, the political climate remains charged with uncertainty. BNP’s extended meeting has reaffirmed its commitment to grassroots engagement, while the emergence of a new political party adds another layer of complexity to the opposition landscape.

    Key challenges include maintaining party unity, ensuring fair electoral conditions, and countering potential state or external interference. Meanwhile, internal disputes within the Nagorik Committee highlight the difficulties of forming a cohesive alternative force in the political arena.

    The role of digital platforms in political activism, the engagement of youth in democratic processes, and the influence of international pressure will also shape Bangladesh’s electoral future. With elections expected in December, the coming months will be crucial for Bangladesh’s democratic trajectory. BNP’s ability to mobilise its base, forge alliances, and maintain strategic discipline will determine its effectiveness in the political battle ahead.

    The Impact of US Funding Freeze on Civil Society Around the World

    To avoid further harm, the US must prioritise the protection of civil society, uphold the right to freedom of association, and ensure that any policy changes are made in a manner that respects the fundamental freedoms on which democracy depends.

    By Gina Romero

    The US administration has the prerogative to review and adjust public expenditure policies, including foreign aid. However, this power must be exercised responsibly, adhering to national and international legal frameworks, including the principles of human rights law.

    The recent decisions by the Trump administration to freeze federal grants and loans, including foreign aid, have raised serious concerns about the implications for local, national and international associations.

    These measures, which followed executive orders aimed at “reevaluating” US foreign assistance and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, risk undermining the freedoms that are vital to democratic societies.

    In a letter sent to the USG, 35 UN experts indicate that the freeze on funding and stop work orders has been described as a drastic measure that could have a far-reaching impact on the ability of individuals and organisations to advocate for and protect human rights.

    The decision to stop work on federal projects, including critical programs funded through foreign aid, is having an immediate effect on vulnerable communities and human rights defenders worldwide. The ripple effects are particularly severe for marginalised groups who depend on these resources for essential services like healthcare, education, access to food and housing.

    These measures also disproportionately affect organisations working on gender equality, LGBTIQ issues, reproductive rights, and poverty alleviation, which are already underfunded and face significant challenges in the global South.

    The implications of these measures affect different type of associations, including small and medium-sized businesses, not-for-profit entities, civil society organisations, universities, faith-based groups, and even scientific research institutions that rely on US funding to carry out their work.

    The speed and scale of the funding freeze have left these entities unable to fulfil their missions. Some have already been forced to lay off staff, suspend vital programs, and even close their doors, leading to the shrinking of civic space in countries where they have long been key players in advocating for democracy, human rights, and sustainable development.

    The Need for Proportionality, Transparency, and Legal Compliance

    While the goal of effective public expenditure is commendable, its success depends on a transparent and inclusive process that is in line with legal standards, including international human rights law. These measures, which were implemented with little consultation or clear communication, have not adhered to the principle of proportionality, which is enshrined in both domestic and international law.

    The absence of transparent guidelines, accountability mechanisms, respect for due process, and avenues for appeal is troubling, especially when the measures have such wide-reaching consequences.

    International human rights law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which the United States is a signatory, guarantees the right to freedom of association. This right not only protects the ability to form associations but also to carry out the activities for which those associations were established.

    The freedom to access resources is a critical component of this right, as it enables organisations to seek, receive, and use resources from a variety of sources, both domestic and international. When funding is denied, it effectively denies organisations the means to operate, undermining their ability to fulfil their missions.

    The freeze on US funding, without due process or clear guidelines, is in direct conflict with these principles. The lack of clarity on how decisions are made or how organisations can challenge them undermines the rights of associations.

    Furthermore, the failure to involve stakeholders—including US civil society organisations—in the decision-making process is a violation of the principles of democratic governance and transparency.

    The Global Impact of US Funding Decisions

    The far-reaching consequences of the funding freeze are most acutely felt in countries where US aid supports critical initiatives in areas such as healthcare, education, peacebuilding, and human rights protection.

    For example, programs addressing sexual and reproductive health are at immediate risk of cessation. Similarly, efforts to combat gender-based violence, support displaced communities, and provide education to marginalised groups are being disrupted.

    In addition to these humanitarian concerns, the freeze also threatens to derail long-standing initiatives aimed at promoting democracy, good governance, and the rule of law. US foreign aid has long been a pillar of support for civil society organisations that monitor elections, promote anti-corruption efforts, and advocate for human rights protections, among others.

    The suspension of funding to these programs undermines not only the work of these organisations but also the broader goal of promoting democratic values worldwide.

    The US government’s decision to cut funding to programs that address discrimination—particularly those related to DEI initiatives—has sparked additional controversy. These measures have the potential to undermine efforts to protect individuals from workplace discrimination and ensure equal access to opportunities.

    By targeting DEI programs, the administration is signalling a shift away from policies designed to address structural inequalities, which could have long-term negative effects on social justice worlwide.

    The Stigmatisation of Civil Society Organisations

    Another concerning consequence of these decisions is the stigmatisation of associations managing and receiving US funding. The administration’s rhetoric has painted many civil society organisations as threats to national security.

    This kind of stigmatisation is dangerous because its fosters hostility toward groups that are engaged in legitimate advocacy for development, human rights and democratic governance.

    Also, it places these organisations—and their staff—at risk of harassment, intimidation, and even physical violence, particularly in countries where civil society organisations are already under threat. Stigmatisation is the entry door for repression and violence.

    This pattern of vilification has serious consequences. As I noted in my more recent report to the UN General Assembly, negative narratives about civil society organisations and other associations deepen the stigmatisation of activists and organisations, leading to increased repression, physical attacks, and online harassment.

    These dynamics create an environment in which activists and civil society organisations are seen not as contributors to public good but as enemies.

    The Path Forward: Upholding Human Rights and Civil Society

    The decision to freeze funding may have been motivated by a desire to ensure more effective public spending, but it risks doing lasting damage to civil society. The lack of transparency, failure to follow due process, and disregard for international human rights law make these measures problematic.

    To ensure that the US upholds its commitment to human rights and the freedom of association, it is imperative that the US government must urgently comply with the recent court orders, pay invoices, reconsider the impact of its freeze on foreign aid and federal grants and to compensate for the damage done. Besides, future decisions regarding foreign aid and public funding be made with greater clarity, accountability, and respect for the rule of law.

    The US must also recognise that associations in general and civil society organisations in particular are critical to the realisation of human rights. These organisations play an essential role in advocating for the protection of fundamental freedoms, including the rights to health, education, and social justice.

    Freezing funding and issuing stop work orders without clear and transparent procedures not only undermines these organisations but also threatens to dismantle vital systems of support for marginalised communities.

    It is crucial that the US government ensures that future funding decisions are made with respect for international human rights standards, that organisations are able to access the resources they need to carry out their work, and that the right to freedom of association is upheld.

    In conclusion, the freeze on US funding represents a significant threat to the functioning of civil society organisations and to the protection of human rights globally. While the government’s decision to review public expenditure is within its rights, the approach taken thus far raises serious concerns about transparency, proportionality, and adherence to international human rights law.

    To avoid further harm, the US must prioritise the protection of civil society, uphold the right to freedom of association, and ensure that any policy changes are made in a manner that respects the fundamental freedoms on which democracy depends.

    Gina Romero is UN Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of assembly and of association

    This piece has been sourced from Inter Press Service

    UN Rights Chief Decries Substantial Rise in Death Penalty Executions

    Latest UN data indicates that in 2023, 1,153 executions took place in 16 countries, representing a 31 per cent increase from 2022 and the highest number in the past eight years.

    International efforts to eradicate the death penalty came into sharp focus at the Human Rights Council on Tuesday, where UN human rights chief Volker Türk decried a substantial increase in global executions in the last two years. 

    “While a number of countries argue that it lies within their national sovereignty, from my perspective, it is incompatible with human dignity and the right to life,” the High Commissioner told Member States, during a discussion about the contribution of judiciaries to advancing human rights over the issue.

    The punishment had “no place” in the 21st century, Mr. Turk, continued, noting that “the top executing countries over recent years” include Iran, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and the United States.

    Clear evidence

    Latest UN data indicates that in 2023, 1,153 executions took place in 16 countries, representing a 31 per cent increase from 2022 and the highest number in the past eight years.

    “That followed a 53 per cent increase in executions between 2021 and 2022,” the High Commissioner said, adding that the figures do not take into account China, “where there is a lack of transparent information and statistics on the death penalty. I call on the Chinese authorities to change this policy and join the trend towards abolition.”

    Global South leading abolition

    Although drug-related offences do not meet the “most serious crimes” justification for executions under international human rights law, they account for more than 40 per cent of death penalty executions – the highest number since 2016.

    “This proportion has also risen sharply over the past two years, and almost all of these executions took place in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Mr. Türk explained.

    In more positive developments and despite a global rise in executions, a growing number of countries are abolishing the practice – spurred by the Global South, he said.

    Today, 113 countries have scrapped the death penalty completely. This includes Zimbabwe – where President Emmerson Mnangagwa approved a law ending executions at the end of 2024 – along with 26 other countries in Africa.

    Key to abolition are judicial reform and discretion in commuting executions to lesser punishments, the High Commissioner insisted. Malawi and Malaysia have implemented such reforms, leading to fewer death sentences, Mr. Türk continued, as he called for greater efforts globally to ensure fair trials and avoid wrongful convictions.

    He urged nations to move towards the complete abolition of the death penalty, advocate for moratoriums, and ensure that the death penalty is only used for the most serious crimes.

    Hate Speech in Sri Lanka Increased 113 Per Cent after November 2024, Says UN

    The reduction of safety guardrails intended to protect women, other sexual and gender minorities, and immigrants, among others, may result in less efficient removal of content targeting these groups on Meta-owned platforms, says the United Nations in Sri Lanka.

    Harmful speech in Sri Lanka increased 113 per cent in November 2024, coinciding with the Sri Lankan parliamentary election held on November 14, according to the United Nations offices in Sri Lanka. This increase was primarily driven by a 159 per cent surge in gender-based harmful speech.

    According to the United Nations in Sri Lanka, over 35 per cent of all gender-based harmful speech recorded in November was targeted at women candidates campaigning for the parliamentary elections. In December, after the elections concluded, harmful speech decreased by 35 per cent. However, gender-based harmful speech increased as a percentage against the total harmful content recorded, accounting for 66 per cent of all harmful content recorded in December 2024, up from 55 per cent in November.

    The UN in Sri Lanka also reported an eight-fold rise in hate speech targeting ethnic and/or religious minorities following the declaration of results of the presidential election in September 2024. “Through collaboration with tech companies and active efforts of local organizations, targeted online campaigns against minorities have decreased since 2021 — an encouraging trend,” UN Sri Lanka said. “However, anti-Christian, anti-Muslim and anti-Hindu sentiments persist alongside harmful speech targeting women, especially those occupying public functions or those speaking up publicly.”

    In the first eight months of 2024, there was a decline in harmful speech overall (year-on-year) of 32 percent, the UN in Sri Lanka reported. However, the increase in harmful speech in November and December is a worrying trend, especially the surge in gender-based harmful speech.

    Meta Content Moderation Policy

    The UN in Sri Lanka has raised concerns about the recent changes to social media policies that may impact online safety. In early January 2025, Meta (the parent company of Facebook) announced it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States and also announced several major changes to content (moderation) policy, including changes to its:

    • Policy on hate speech, now called “Hateful Conduct”: This will allow some speech that was previously prohibited and removes some protections on topics such as immigration and gender.
    • Automated systems: Meta will now focus on tackling illegal and high-severity content — such as terrorism, drugs, child exploitation, and frauds & scams — and will rely more on user reporting for other policy violations.
    • Approach to political content: Meta will channel political content to users based on personalized signals, making it easier for people who want to see a particular type of content in their feeds to do so.

    Fact-Checking, Content Moderation

    The implications of these changes to content monitoring and reporting in Sri Lanka are as yet unclear. However, the reduction of safety guardrails intended to protect women, other sexual and gender minorities, and immigrants, among others, may result in less efficient removal of content targeting these groups on Meta-owned platforms.

    The UN in Sri Lanka has called on social media platforms to take steps to address the issue of harmful speech. “We urge social media platforms to do more to address the issue of harmful speech,” said a spokesperson for the UN in Sri Lanka. “This includes investing in fact-checking and content moderation, and developing policies that protect vulnerable groups.”

    The UN in Sri Lanka has also called on the government to take action to address the issue of harmful speech. “We urge the government to take steps to address the issue of harmful speech,” said a spokesperson for the UN in Sri Lanka. “This includes enacting legislation that criminalizes hate speech and providing education and awareness-raising programs.”

    The UN in Sri Lanka says that is committed to working with all stakeholders to address the issue of harmful speech. “We believe that everyone has a role to play in addressing the issue of harmful speech,” said a spokesperson for the UN in Sri Lanka. “We encourage everyone to be vigilant and to report any instances of harmful speech that they see online.”

    Maharashtra Farmers to Receive Rs 15,000 Annually as State Government Boosts Aid

    These projects, along with the increased financial aid and focus on sustainable energy and water management, represent a multi-pronged approach to strengthening the agricultural sector in Maharashtra and empowering its farmers.

    In a significant move aimed at bolstering the agricultural sector, the Maharashtra government has announced a substantial increase in financial assistance under the NaMo Shetkari Mahasanman Nidhi Yojna (NSMNY). Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis revealed the hike from Rs 6,000 to Rs 9,000 per year during an event in Nagpur on Monday, coinciding with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s release of the 19th instalment of the PM-Kisan Yojna from Bhagalpur, Bihar on Monday.

    This increase, combined with the Rs 6,000 provided by the central government under the PM-Kisan Yojna, will bring the total annual assistance for farmers in Maharashtra to Rs 15,000. “The state government currently provides Rs 6,000 under NSMNY, matching the Centre’s assistance. Now, this amount will be increased to Rs 9,000, ensuring greater financial stability for farmers,” Fadnavis said. This boost to the NSMNY was a key promise made by the BJP during the election campaign. Sources told OWSA that this scheme will be formally incorporated into the 2025-26 state budget.

    Maharashtra minister of state for agriculture Ashish Jaiswal, who also attended the Nagpur event, emphasised the critical role of these assured funds in providing relief to farmers facing persistent financial challenges. The increased financial aid is expected to significantly improve the livelihoods of farmers across the state.

    Focus on Water Conservation and Solar Energy

    Beyond the increased financial aid, Chief Minister Fadnavis highlighted the state government’s commitment to water conservation through the Jalyukta Shivar Yojna. This initiative aims to enhance irrigation capabilities and mitigate the impact of droughts. According to Fadnavis, 89 irrigation projects have been successfully completed in the Vidarbha region, with nearly 150 more currently underway. These projects are crucial for ensuring a stable water supply for agriculture, especially in drought-prone areas.

    Looking towards a sustainable future for agriculture, Fadnavis also announced ambitious plans to transition the entire farm power grid to solar energy within the next five years. “In the past year alone, one lakh farmers have been provided with solar power,” he said, underscoring the government’s commitment to this initiative. The shift to solar power will not only reduce the environmental impact of agriculture but also provide farmers with a more reliable and cost-effective energy source.

    Government’s Commitment to Agricultural Development

    The government is set to publicise these initiatives – the increased financial aid, the focus on water conservation, and the push for solar energy – as demonstration of the Maharashtra government’s comprehensive approach to agricultural sustainability and rural empowerment. The government, an official of the ministry of agriculture said, aims to not only provide immediate financial relief to farmers but also create long-term solutions for the challenges facing the agricultural sector.

    The Chief Minister reiterated the government’s dedication to supporting the agricultural sector, which plays a vital role in the livelihoods of a large portion of the state’s population. He acknowledged past criticism regarding the NSMNY, but emphasised that farmers now recognise the benefits of the financial assistance in procuring essential inputs for agricultural production.

    Earlier Initiatives and Continued Support

    In October 2023, Prime Minister Modi released approximately Rs 2,000 crore to Maharashtra farmers as the fifth instalment of the NSMNY. To date, Maharashtra has received around Rs 32,000 crores under the scheme, distributed to approximately 1.20 crore farmers in 17 instalments, the second highest among all Indian states. In the 18th instalment, over Rs 1,900 crore was disbursed to approximately 91.51 lakh farmers.

    The government also continues to support agricultural infrastructure through the Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (AIF), the official of the agriculture ministry said. Since its launch in 2020, the AIF has facilitated the sanctioning of numerous projects aimed at enhancing post-harvest management infrastructure and community farming assets. These projects, along with the increased financial aid and focus on sustainable energy and water management, represent a multi-pronged approach to strengthening the agricultural sector in Maharashtra and empowering its farmers.

    Image: Wikimedia

    Bangladesh: Yunus Talks of Social Business; Seeks Swedish ‘Collaboration’ for Hydropower from Nepal

    SIDA’s current cooperation strategy with Bangladesh covers 2021-2025. In 2024, SIDA has disbursed nearly one billion SEK across various programs, including 127.7 million SEK in humanitarian aid, primarily for displaced Myanmar nationals (Rohingya) in Cox’s Bazar and the host community.

    Muhammad Yunus, chief adviser of Bangladesh’s interim government, has urged Sweden to shift its development assistance strategy from grants to investments in social businesses. Yunus made the appeal during a meeting Sunday with Jakob Granit, director general of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), in Dhaka.  

    Yunus emphasised the potential of social business, particularly in sectors like healthcare, as a more sustainable and impactful approach to development compared to traditional grant aid. “What I have been promoting is social business as grant money is a charity,” Yunus stated, highlighting the distinction between philanthropic donations and investments that generate both social good and financial returns.  

    Beyond social business, Yunus also sought Sweden’s support in addressing Bangladesh’s energy crisis. He proposed importing hydroelectricity from ‘neighbouring’ Nepal, which possesses significant untapped resources. “We are an energy-starved country,” Yunus explained. “Nepal has a huge resource for producing hydropower, and we are willing to bring it. SIDA can collaborate with both of us to make that happen.”

    Changed Geopolitical Situation

    Granit acknowledged the “changed geopolitical situation” and the “critically important period” for Bangladesh, stating that SIDA is actively seeking ways to maximise the effectiveness of its assistance. “Also, we are looking for ways on how we can support the Bangladesh government and make sure that we have the right type of support,” Granit said. He also inquired about the interim government’s reform initiatives.  

    SIDA’s current cooperation strategy with Bangladesh covers 2021-2025. In 2024, SIDA has disbursed nearly one billion SEK across various programs, including 127.7 million SEK in humanitarian aid, primarily for displaced Myanmar nationals (Rohingya) in Cox’s Bazar and the host community.  

    Yunus welcomed Sweden’s commitment to supporting Bangladesh’s transformation. “As an interim government, we don’t have much time left, but we want to lay down the foundation,” he said. He described the challenges faced by the interim government in rebuilding the country after the previous regime, stating that “everything collapsed in Bangladesh during the past regime,” and the current administration is working to rebuild those “piece by piece.”

    Nicolas Weeks, Sweden’s Ambassador to Bangladesh, acknowledged the urgent need to address the Rohingya situation and reaffirmed Sweden’s continued assistance. The discussions highlighted the evolving nature of international development cooperation and the growing emphasis on sustainable, market-based solutions like social business.

    Record 6.82 Lakh Olive Ridley Turtles Visit Odisha’s Rushikulya River Mouth for Mass Nesting

    Favourable climatic conditions are one of the reasons for a record number of Olive Ridley turtles visiting the beach for mass nesting, experts said.

    Rushikulya river mouth in Odisha’s Ganjam district has emerged as a major rookery for the endangered olive ridley turtles with over 6.82 lakh such marine species assembling for mass nesting, officials said on Sunday.

    The mass nesting of the turtles in the Rushikulya river mouth commenced on February 16.

    “Over 6.82 lakh Olive Ridley turtles have laid eggs on the beach so far, surpassing the previous record of the arrival of 6.37 lakh marine species in 2023,” Berhampur divisional forest officer (DFO) Sunny Khokkar was quoted by news agency PTI as saying.

    A total of 6,37,008 turtles had laid eggs in eight days of mass nesting from February 23 to March 2, in 2023. In comparison, 5.50 lakh turtles laid eggs in 2022, sources said.

    As the mass nesting of the Olive Ridley is yet to be completed, the number might increase, the DFO said.

    Favourable climatic conditions are one of the reasons for a record number of Olive Ridley turtles visiting the beach for mass nesting, experts said.

    “The better climatic condition this year has helped more turtles lay eggs in the Rushikulya river mouth, which is emerging as a major rookery for the turtles,” Wildlife Institute of India (WII) Dehradun senior scientist Bivas Pandav said.

    Zoological Survey of India (ZSI) senior scientist Basudev Tripathy predicts a good number of hatchlings likely to emerge as the mass nesting has taken place in time in the rookery.

    ZSI scientists have recaptured over 330 Olive Ridley turtles so far as these turtles were GPS–tagged in the 2021-23 period, said Anil Mohapatra, another senior scientist of the surveyor.

    Dibya Shankar Behera, range officer, Khallikote said the government has put fencing in the new areas as the turtles nested from New Podampeta to Prayagi-around 9-km stretch this time. The fencing is made to protect the eggs from predators.

    This piece has been sourced from Odishabytes.com

    Unbiased Coverage Thrown Out of the Window

    No publishing house or news channel or journalist should have such vastly different standards with regard to putting out news. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but this must be kept out of the news pages or news sections of TV channels.

    By Premangshu Ray

    It is high time that the media, which is known as the Fourth Estate or fourth power, gets back on track and restarts doing its job with integrity.

    This is essential not only for the sake of the society as a whole but also to ensure that the media regains its reputation as the conscience keeper of society and continues to be looked upon for impartial dissemination of information. This is more so as the media has traditionally been known to wield influence in politics, an attribute that is said to have led to the coinage of the term Fourth Estate.

    Even a cursory review of what is published in the newspapers or aired on news channels would show that this needs reiteration as unbiased coverage of news has been thrown out of the window.

    Wow, $21m!

    A case in point is the USAID controversy. The Telegraph was one of the very few English language papers that gave prominence to the statement by US President Donald Trump that USAID gave $21 million to Prime Minister Narendra Modi “for voter turnout”. This, the paper pointed out in the next sentence, came a day after Trump called the funding a “kickback scheme”. The paper did not mince words or dilute the issue. USAID boot on other foot, it said in the headline.

    The Free Press Journal also carried the copy prominently. However, the twist that it gave of the Congress latching on to Trump’s statement in this regard diluted the seriousness of the assertion by the US President of “USD21 million going to my friend Prime Minister Modi in India for voter turnout.”

    The Times of India carried the report on Page 1 but not as the lead copy. It further sought to dilute the import of the statement with the headline ‘Trump spares neither oppn nor govt with USAID claims’. It watered it down much further with phrases such as “he of torrential verbiage”, “purportedly allocated by USAID to increase voter turnout in India”, and “an off-the-cuff remark”.

    Deccan Herald, a major English paper in South India, carried the news in much the same manner on Page 8, its second Nation page. Just as TOI did with its report on Page 1, DH diluted the significance of the news with the headline ‘Congress corners BJP over Trump’s $21mn claim’, thus shifting the focus from the claim itself to the attack by the Congress. It went on to shift focus much more by the words “In indications that it would not go soft on its I.N.D.I.A-partner AAP, the Congress put Arvind Kejriwal in the line of fire.”

    In contrast, when Trump had said on Wednesday in Miami that USAID had spent $21 million in India, most papers not only latched on to the news but also displayed it well on Page 1: “Why do we need to spend $21m for voter turnout in India? Wow, $21m! I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected,” Trump had said.

    Playing Up BJP’s Allegation

    The papers had also played up the Bharatiya Janata Party allegation that the Congress had used external influence in the country’s electoral process. DH led the February 21 edition with the headline screaming ‘They were trying to get ‘somebody else elected’: Trump’. The copy clarified that “they” meant the Joe Biden administration.

    TOI also carried Trump’s remark on Page 1 with the headline ‘Bid to get someone else elected: Trump on USAID’s $21m’. The paper spiced this up with the strapline ‘Hints Biden Was Backing Cong, Allies In LS Polls’, though the US President did not mention either the Congress or any other opposition party in his remarks.

    What is far more worrisome is that the paper on February 23, carried alongside the watered down report about the “$21 going to my friend, Prime Minister Modi in India for voter turnout” one paragraph of an article where India’s foreign minister makes a feeble attempt to deflect blame. The complete article, which has been carried on Page 12, does not have any evidence of the reporter trying in any manner to question the minister’s claim despite the remark being made at a public event.

    The Last Word

    No publishing house or news channel or journalist should have such vastly different standards with regard to putting out news. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinion, but this must be kept out of the news pages or news sections of TV channels. These pages must carry news and not opinion or even analyses, which are best left to pages clearly earmarked as such. All of us are entitled to and most of us will have our views about politics, religion, culture, sport and most things under the sun. However, it is essential that we keep our biases out of our work. Only when we do that can we even start on the path of regaining the trust of the people and also our reputation as people who can be looked upon to tell others the truth.

    The author is a senior journalist who writes on sociopolitical and socioeconomic issues.

    PM Modi Releases 19th PM-KISAN Instalment in Bhagalpur; Lauds FPOs

    The release of the PM-KISAN instalment and the celebration of the 10,000th FPO mark significant milestones in the government’s ongoing efforts to empower farmers and boost the agricultural sector.

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi today released the 19th instalment of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme from Bhagalpur, Bihar, directly benefiting over 9.8 crore farmers across the country. The event, held in the spiritually significant land of Mandarachal during the Maha Kumbh period, also saw the Prime Minister launch several development projects and celebrate a milestone achievement in farmer empowerment: the formation of the 10,000th Farmer Producer Organisation (FPO).

    Addressing a large gathering, PM Modi expressed satisfaction that the PM-KISAN scheme, which has now disbursed nearly ₹22,000 crore in this instalment alone, has proven invaluable to small farmers nationwide. He highlighted the direct transfer of funds, totalling approximately ₹3.7 lakh crore since the scheme’s inception, into the accounts of farmers, emphasising the government’s commitment to eliminating intermediaries and ensuring that every penny reaches the intended beneficiaries. He specifically mentioned the approximately 75 lakh farmer families in Bihar who are beneficiaries of the scheme, receiving around ₹1,600 crore in this instalment.

    The Prime Minister reiterated his government’s dedication to the four pillars of a developed India: the poor, farmers, youth, and women. He asserted that farmer welfare remains a top priority for both the central and state governments. He outlined the government’s efforts to address the multifaceted challenges faced by farmers, from providing high-quality seeds and sufficient fertilisers to ensuring irrigation facilities, livestock protection, and disaster relief. He criticised previous governments for neglecting these crucial needs, highlighting the current government’s proactive approach.

    10,000th FPO

    PM Modi emphasised the government’s success in ensuring adequate fertiliser supply, even during the pandemic, and contrasted the affordable prices of urea in India with the exorbitant prices in other countries. He stated that the central government has borne the cost of urea and DAP, saving farmers approximately ₹12 lakh crore over the past decade. He also underscored the importance of the PM Fasal Bima Yojana, which has provided ₹1.75 lakh crore in claim payouts to farmers affected by natural disasters.

    A key highlight of the event was the Prime Minister’s celebration of the formation of the 10,000th FPO. He lauded this achievement as a significant step towards empowering small farmers. “Today, the land of Bihar has witnessed the formation of the 10,000th FPO,” he announced, congratulating all FPO members across the country. He emphasised that FPOs are not just organisations but a powerful force for increasing farmers’ income by providing them with collective bargaining power and direct access to markets. He noted that approximately 30 lakh farmers, including a significant number of women, are connected to FPOs, which are now conducting business worth thousands of crores in the agricultural sector. The FPO registered in Khagaria district, Bihar, focusing on maize, banana, and paddy, was specifically mentioned as the 10,000th FPO.

    PM Modi also spoke about the government’s focus on promoting animal husbandry to supplement the income of landless and small farmers. He noted the increase in milk production and the role of cooperative milk unions in Bihar. He also highlighted the government’s efforts to support the fisheries sector, which has led to Bihar becoming one of the top five fish-producing states in India.

    Bihar’s special products

    The Prime Minister stressed the importance of boosting agricultural exports and highlighted the government’s initiatives to promote Bihar’s special products, such as Makhana and Bhagalpuri silk, in global markets. He announced the formation of a Makhana Vikas Board to support farmers engaged in its cultivation, processing, value addition, and marketing. He also mentioned the establishment of a National Institute of Food Technology and Entrepreneurship in Bihar and the creation of Centers of Excellence in agriculture, including one in Bhagalpur for Jardalu mangoes.

    PM Modi reiterated his government’s commitment to infrastructure development in Bihar, mentioning the construction of bridges over rivers, the widening of highways, and the development of rail connectivity. He also discussed the government’s efforts to mitigate flood damage and bring more land under irrigation. He reaffirmed the government’s dedication to preserving India’s cultural heritage, mentioning the establishment of a central university at Vikramshila.

    The event was attended by Bihar Governor Arif Mohammed Khan, Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, and several Union Ministers, underscoring the collaborative efforts towards farmer welfare and the development of Bihar. The release of the PM-KISAN instalment and the celebration of the 10,000th FPO mark significant milestones in the government’s ongoing efforts to empower farmers and boost the agricultural sector.

    Sixfold increase in agriculture budget

    On the occasion, union minister Dr. Jitendra Singh also lauded the strides made in India’s agricultural sector, highlighting a sixfold increase in the union agriculture budget, from ₹21,933.50 crore in 2013-14 to ₹1,27,290 crore in 2025-26.

    The union minister proudly announced that the government would be disbursing ₹22,000 crore to 9.8 crore farmers as part of this instalment. With ₹3.46 lakh crore already distributed in 18 instalments, the PM KISAN program continues to play a pivotal role in supporting farmers’ livelihoods. In a bid to further strengthen the program, Dr. Singh revealed that 30 lakh more farmers have been added as beneficiaries under the PM KISAN scheme.

    The Union Minister also highlighted the increase in the Kisan Credit Card (KCC) limit from ₹3 lakh to ₹5 lakh, which will significantly improve access to credit for farmers, enabling them to invest in modern agricultural practices and equipment.

    Dr. Jitendra Singh also unveiled the PM Dhan Dhanya Krishi Yojana, a new initiative aimed at identifying 100 districts for agricultural advancement, thereby ensuring that targeted resources and technologies are provided to boost productivity in these areas.

    He emphasised the transformation in India’s agricultural ecosystem over the last decade, calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi the champion of farmers’ welfare. He recalled the Prime Minister’s vision of doubling farmers’ incomes and enhancing agricultural technologies to supplement their efforts.

    “Over the past decade, we have witnessed a significant transformation in agriculture, with the government ensuring fixed support to farmers. Initiatives like soil health cards, Kisan Credit Cards, financial inclusion, and advanced technologies, such as drone usage for spraying pesticides and fertilisers, micro-irrigation in high-altitude areas, and the expansion of irrigation facilities, have played a crucial role,” said Dr. Singh.

    He emphasised that these efforts not only benefit agriculture but also contribute significantly to the Indian economy, with agriculture being the prime mover of India’s growth.