More

    Pandemic Pushes SDGs Further out of Reach of Asia and the Pacific

    The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is becoming increasingly distant. The region must use the 17 Sustainable Development Goals as a roadmap to a fairer recovery.

    Armida Salsiah Alisjahbana

    2022 marks the second anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic, and while an end to the pandemic is in sight, it is far from over and the consequences will be felt for decades to come. At the same time, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is becoming increasingly distant. The region must use the 17 Sustainable Development Goals as a roadmap to a fairer recovery.

    This year’s edition of the Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report published by ESCAP reveals three alarming trends. First, the region is losing ground in its 2030 ambitions. In addition to our slowed progress, human-made crises and natural disasters have also hampered our ability to achieve the Goals. We are seeing the gaps grow wider with each passing year: at its current pace, Asia and the Pacific is now only expected to achieve the 17 Sustainable Development Goals by 2065 – three-and-a-half decades behind the original goalpost. The region must seize every opportunity to arrest this downward trend and accelerate progress.

    Second, while headway on some of the Goals has been made in scattered pockets around the region, we are moving in a reverse direction for some of them at a disturbing rate. Although the climate crisis has become more acute, there has been regression on responsible consumption and production (Goal 12) and climate action (Goal 13). And the news is marginally better for targets dealing with industry, innovation, and infrastructure (Goal 9) and affordable and clean energy (Goal 7) as they fall short of the pace required to meet the 2030 Agenda.

    Lastly, the need to reach those who are furthest behind has never been greater. The region is experiencing widening disparities and increased vulnerabilities. The most vulnerable and disadvantaged groups — including women, children, people with disabilities, migrants and refugees, rural populations and poorer households — are the victims of our unsustainable and non-inclusive development trends.

    Some groups with distinct demographic or socioeconomic characteristics are disproportionately excluded from progress in Asia and the Pacific. Understanding the intersection of key development challenges with population characteristics such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, health, location, migratory status and income is critical to achieving a more equitable recovery. We must work together as a region to ensure that no one or no country falls behind.

    Although these trends are extremely worrying, there is some good news that helps our understanding of them: The number of indicators with data available have doubled since 2017. Collaboration between national and international custodian agencies for the indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals has significantly contributed to enhancing the availability of data. We must, however, continue to strengthen this cooperation to close the remaining gaps, as 57 of the 169 SDG targets still cannot be measured.

    The sole focus on economic recovery post-pandemic is likely to hinder progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals, which was already lagging to begin with. As the region strives to build back better and recover, the 2030 Agenda can serve as a guiding mechanism for both economic and social development. We – the governments, stakeholders and United Nations organizations that support them – must maintain our collective commitment towards a more prosperous and greener world.

     

    Armida Salsiah Alisjahbana is Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations and Executive Secretary of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).

    India examines medical school costs amid Ukraine exodus

    The Indian government recently announced that half of the seats in private medical colleges will have the same charges as their government counterparts. Private medical education unaffordable for many aspiring medicos in India. The recent evacuation of some 18,000 Indian students from war-torn Ukraine has highlighted the lack of affordable seats in India’s medical schools.

    By Ranjit Devraj

    A move by India to make medical education more affordable comes as thousands of Indian medical students trapped in war-torn Ukraine are evacuated facing an uncertain future.

    Of the 20,000 students who fled the eastern European country since the military invasion by Russia began on 24 February, 18,000 were studying medicine. Most have crossed the border into neighbouring countries like Poland and Hungary to board special flights home.

    Their plight has highlighted the large numbers of young Indians enrolling in medical schools in Russia, the former Soviet Republics and China to beat an acute shortage of seats in the heavily subsidised public sector and the high costs of private medical education in India.

    The government ordered last month that half of the 43,815 medical places available in private sector colleges be thrown open at costs comparable to that charged by government medical schools from the academic year beginning 16 May.

    A note issued by the National Medical Commission, the regulatory body for medical education and the profession, says that private medical institutions must follow the “not-for-profit” principle. It says that while expenses for running a medical college can be recovered from fees charged to students, “no excessive expense and exorbitant profit component should be allowed to be added to the fees”.

    Low health budgets

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s office said in a tweet on 7 March said that his government had decided that “half the seats in private medical colleges will be charged at par with government medical colleges”.  The decision, the tweet said, would “benefit poor and middle-class children”.

    However, the decision is considered far from adequate to meet the demand for medical education in India or the requirements of public health services in the country of 1.4 billion people.

    Mira Shiva, founder-member of the People’s Health Movement, tells SciDev.Net that it is little more than a band-aid applied to serious issues around medical education.

    “For a start the government should increase rather than progressively reduce the budgetary outlay on both health and education and change a policy that leaves these critical social sectors to the mercy of private enterprise,” she said.

    India’s current health expenditure as a percentage of GDP stands at 3.01 according to the World Bank and shows a declining trend. Similarly, the current expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP is 3.5.  Both figures are considered grossly inadequate.

    Shiva said it would have been more meaningful for the government to consider subsidising medical education in both public and private sectors while making information on the medical education sector readily available to the public.

    In 2021, 1.6 million candidates registered for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test to compete for 88,370 Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) seats, about half of which are in the heavily subsidised, state-run medical colleges, while the other half are in privately-run institutions.

    High in cost, lacking in quality

    Those who make it to the state colleges benefit from heavy subsidies. For instance, the annual fee in two of Delhi’s top medical colleges, the Lady Hardinge Medical College and the Maulana Azad Medical College, is less than US$30. But those who manage to get a seat in one of the 218 private medical colleges must pay fees that are typically two or three times more expensive than what a student may have to pay in a country like Ukraine.

    According to Shiva, apart from the high costs, the quality of education in most of the privately-run medical colleges is lacking because of the low pay offered to teaching staff. “Faculty are known to resort to private clinical practice to supplement their incomes and this tells on the overall academic atmosphere,” she said.

    Reghunath Kumaran, an Indian psychiatrist currently working in Canada, says it is unfair to tar all private medical colleges with the same brush. “Maybe I did not have the smarts to attend a government medical college but I have consistently outperformed those from the state-run institutions in various examinations since qualifying. I think the selection process is at fault,” he said.

    Suma Balan, professor at the Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, said: “It would be more correct to say that there are some private colleges that are better than many government colleges while some are not. Of course, the cost-benefit ratio cannot be compared but that’s only because the government colleges are subsidised by the government.”

    Glorified career

    According to Balan, the competition for seats in medical colleges is stiff because a career in medicine is highly glorified at school, home and in society with little consideration given to aptitude. “The Indian system of MBBS selection does not look at the real aptitude, the sole criterion being the ability to answer a multiple-choice questions exam well and, in the case of private institutions, the ability to pay the fees,” she added.

    “Many politicians have significant stakes in the building up of a large number of private medical colleges — one reason why the fees have spun out of control with some colleges asking the equivalent of US$30,000 as annual fees.” That is more than the cost of the entire six-year medical course in Ukraine.

    However, many Indian medical graduates coming in from Ukraine or other countries must sit for a stiff qualifying exam in order to get a license to practice. About 80 per cent of them fail in the first attempt while many never pass subsequent attempts and are forced to settle for allied careers like hospital management.

    Others move abroad in order to acquire postgraduate or higher qualifications. Often, they settle down in countries where the demand for qualified doctors is high, just to be able to provide for their families and be assured of decent career progression.

    India topped a list of foreign-born (94,862) and foreign-trained (70,539) doctors working in the OECD countries, according to a 2017/2018 survey.

     

    Image: Pixabay Picture of Orion Hospital 

    Misinformation Fuelling and Uptick of COVID-19 Worldwide, says WHO

    Misinformation that the pandemic is over and other factors like the lifting of mask mandates and ending physical distancing – exaggerated by a more transmissible Omicron BA.2 variant – are causing an increase of COVID-19 cases globally.

    “After several weeks of declines, reported cases of COVID-19 are once again increasing globally, especially in parts of Asia”, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus said at a press conference in Geneva.

    In the past week, the agency has seen an 8 per cent increase in detection of COVID-19 cases, with more than 11 million positive test results.

    “These increases are occurring despite reductions in testing in some countries, which means the cases we are seeing are just the tip of the iceberg”, Tedros explained, warning that when cases tick up, so do deaths.

    He added that continued local outbreaks and surges are to be expected, particularly in areas where measures to prevent transmission have been lifted, but that there are ‘unacceptably high’ levels of mortality in many countries, especially where vaccination levels are low among susceptible populations.

    “Each country is facing a different situation with different challenges, but the pandemic is not over”, he reiterated.

    A combination of factors

    WHO’s Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove explained that a combination of factors is fuelling the increase of cases worldwide, beginning with a more transmissible variant.

    “We still have Omicron which is transmitting at a very intense level around the world. We have sub-lineages of Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. BA.2 is more transmissible, and this is the most transmissible variant we have seen of the SARS-COV2 virus to date”, she warned.

    The COVID-19 Technical Lead informed that in the last 30 days of more than 400,000 sequences sampled, 99.9 per cent are Omicron, and 75 per cent correspond to the BA.2 variant.

    “We do not see an increase in severity with BA.2. However, with huge numbers of cases you will see increase hospitalisations and we have seen this in country after country”, Dr. Van Kerkhove highlighted.

    Another factor influencing the increase of numbers is the lifting of public health and social measures.

    “Lifting of the use of masks, lifting of physical distancing, lifting of restrictions limiting people’s movement, this provides the virus an opportunity to spread”, Dr. Van Kerkhove cautioned.

    The expert also pointed out that there are ‘huge amounts of misinformation’ causing a lot of confusion among people.

    “The misinformation that Omicron is mild, misinformation that the pandemic is over, misinformation that this is the last variant that we will have to deal with”, she explained.

    The virus has ‘not settled down’

    Meanwhile, Dr Mike Ryan, WHO’s Executive Director of the Health Emergencies Programme clarified that the virus has not ‘settled down’ into a purely seasonal or predictable pattern yet.

    “So, the idea that ‘we are through with it’ in the northern hemisphere and now we have to wait until next winter, I think (for example) when we look at increasing rates in the UK, we need to be very vigilant and cautious with this”, he said.

    The expert added that the virus is still ‘very fit’ and it’s moving around easily and in the context of waning immunity and vaccines not acting perfectly against infection, the virus will likely continue to echo around the world.

    “It will be high in some parts sometimes and then move and be higher again, it will move to another area where immunity is waning. The virus will pick up pockets of susceptibility, and we will survive on those pockets for months until another pocket opens.

    “This is how viruses work.  They establish themselves in a community and they will move quickly to the next community that’s unprotected”, he further explained saying that experts have seen similar patterns with the polio virus.

    “We completely understand that the world needs to move on and wants to move on from COVID-19 but this virus spreads very efficiently between people and if we don’t have the right interventions in place the virus will take opportunities to continue to spread, and the more the virus spreads the more opportunities it has to change”, Dr. Van Kerkhove added.

    Vaccination and vigilance

    Both doctors and WHO chief Tedros also spoke about the importance of vaccination pointing out that the majority of deaths remain amongst the unvaccinated, and older individuals and people with underlying conditions who have not received the full course of effective vaccines.

    “We need to reinstate the importance of vaccination in every country. This is not just a North-South issue. Every country needs to look again at vaccination levels on the most vulnerable whether using booster policies or not and ensure that at the very minimum every individual who is vulnerable has two doses of effective vaccines”, Dr. Ryan urged.

    Dr. Van Kerkhove explained that the data shows that COVID-19 vaccines remain ‘incredibly’ effective to prevent severe disease and death, including against Omicron.

    She added that the world also needs a very strong surveillance system for COVID-19 to be aware of how the virus is evolving.

    “Despite all of the challenges that we are facing, we still need to maintain testing, we still need to maintain robust sequencing and making sure that we have geographic representation of the sequences that are shared”, she underscored.

     

    Image: Hippopx, licensed to use under Creative Commons Zero – CC0

    Ukraine Incursion, World Stagflation

    No country is immune, including those imposing sanctions. But the worst hit are poor countries already struggling with rising fuel and food prices.

    By Anis Chowdhury and Jomo Kwame Sundaram

    Finger pointing in the blame game over Russia’s incursion into Ukraine obscures the damage it is doing on many fronts. Meanwhile, billions struggle to cope with worsening living standards, exacerbated by the pandemic and more.

    US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken insists, “the Russian people will suffer the consequences of their leaders’ choices”. Western leaders and media seem to believe their unprecedented “crushing sanctions” will have a “chilling effect” on Russia.

    With sanctions intended to strangle Russia’s economy, the US and its allies somehow hope to increase domestic pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to retreat from Ukraine. The West wants to choke Russia by cutting its revenue streams, e.g., from oil and gas sales to Europe.

    Already, the Rouble has been hammered by preventing Russia’s central bank from accessing its US$ 643 billion in foreign currency reserves, and barring Russian banks from using the US-run global payments transfer system, SWIFT.

    Losing sight in the fog of war

    Withdrawal of major Western transnational companies – such as Shell, McDonald’s and Apple – will undoubtedly hurt many Russians – not only oligarchs, their ostensible target.

    Thus, Blinken’s claim that “The economic costs that we’ve been forced to impose on Russia are not aimed at you [ordinary Russians]” may well ring hollow to them. They will get little comfort from knowing, “They are aimed at compelling your government to stop its actions, to stop its aggression”.

    As The New York Times notes, “sanctions have a poor record of persuading governments to change their behavior”. US sanctions against Cuba over six decades have undoubtedly hurt its economy and people.

    But – as in Iran, North Korea, Syria and Venezuela – it has failed to achieve its supposed objectives. Clearly, “If the goal of sanctions is to compel Mr. Putin to halt his war, then the end point seems far-off.”

    Russia, major commodity exporter

    Undoubtedly, Russia no longer has the industrial and technological edges it once had. Following Yeltsin era reforms in the early 1990s, its economy shrank by half – lowering Russian life expectancy more than anywhere else in the last six millennia!

    Russia has become a major primary commodity producer – not unlike many developing countries and the former settler colonies of North America and Australasia. It is now a major exporter of crude oil and natural gas.

    It is also the largest exporter of palladium and wheat, and among the world’s biggest suppliers of fertilizers using potash and nitrogen. On 4 March, Moscow suspended fertilizer exports, citing “sabotage” by “foreign logistics companies”.

    Farmers and consumers will suffer as yields drop by up to half. Sudden massive supply disruptions will thus have serious ramifications for the world economy – now more interdependent than ever, due to earlier globalization.

    Sanctions’ inflation boomerang

    International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva has ominously warned of the Ukraine crisis’ economic fallouts. She cautions wide-ranging sanctions on Russia will worsen inflation and further slow growth.

    No country is immune, including those imposing sanctions. But the worst hit are poor countries, particularly in Africa, already struggling with rising fuel and food prices.

    For Georgieva, more inflation – due to Russian sanctions – is the greatest threat to the world economy. “The surging prices for energy and other commodities – corn, metals, inputs for fertilizers, semiconductors – coming on top of already high inflation” are of grave concern to the world.

    Russia and Ukraine export more than a quarter of the world’s wheat while Ukraine is also a major corn exporter. Supply chain shocks and disruptions could add between 0.2 per cent to 0.4 per cent to ‘headline inflation’ – which includes both food and fuel prices – in developed economies over the coming months.

    US petrol prices jumped to a 17-year high in the first week of March. The costs of other necessities, especially food, are rising as well. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has acknowledged that the sanctions are worsening US inflation.

    The European Union (EU) gets 40 per cent of its natural gas from Russia. Finding alternative supplies will be neither easy nor cheap. The EU is Russia’s largest trading partner, accounting for 37 per cent of global trade in 2020. Thus, sanctions may well hurt Europe more than Russia – like cutting one’s nose to spite one’s face.

    The European Central Bank now expects stagflation – economic stagnation with inflation, and presumably, rising unemployment. It has already slashed its growth forecast for 2022 from 4.2 per cent to 3.7 per cent. Inflation is expected to hit a record 5.1 per cent – way above its previous 3.2 per cent forecast!

    Developing countries worse victims

    Global food prices are already at record highs, with the Food Price Index (FPI) of the Food and Agricultural Organization up more than 40 per cent over the past two years.

    The FPI hit an all-time high in February – largely due to bad weather and rising energy and fertilizer costs. By February 2022, the Agricultural Commodity Price Index was 35 per cent higher, while maize and wheat prices were 26 per cent and 23 per cent more than in January 2021.

    Besides shortages and rising production costs – due to surging fuel and fertilizer prices – speculation may also push food prices up – as in 2007-2008.

    Signs of such speculation are already visible. Chicago Board of Trade wheat future prices rose 40 per cent in early March – its largest weekly increase since 1959!

    Rising food prices impact people in low- and middle-income countries more as they spend much larger shares of their incomes on food than in high-income countries. The main food insecurity measure has doubled in the past two years, with 45 million people close to starvation, even before the Ukraine crisis.

    Countries in Africa and Asia rely much more on Russian and Ukrainian grain. The World Bank has warned, “There will be important ramifications for the Middle East, for Africa, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, in particular”, where many were already food insecure before the incursion.

    The Ukraine crisis will be devastating for countries struggling to cope with the pandemic. Unable to access enough vaccines or mount adequate responses, they already lag behind rich countries. The latest food and fuel price hikes will also worsen balance-of-payments problems and domestic inflationary pressures.

    No to war!

    The African proverb, “When two elephants fight, all grass gets trampled”, sums up the world situation well. The US and its allies seem intent to ‘strangle Russia’ at all costs, regardless of the massive collateral damage to others.

    This international crisis comes after multilateralism has been undermined for decades. Hopes for reduced international hostilities, after President Biden’s election, have evaporated as US foreign policy double standards become more apparent.

    Russia has little support for its aggressive violation of international law and norms. Despite decades of deliberate NATO provocations, even after the Soviet Union ended, Putin has lost international sympathy with his aggression in Ukraine.

    But there is no widespread support for NATO or the West. Following the vaccine apartheid and climate finance fiascos, the poorer, ‘darker nations’ have become more cynical of Western hypocrisy as its racism becomes more brazen.

     

    This piece has been sourced from Inter Press Service

    Image: Hippopx — License to use Creative Commons Zero – CC0

    Entire Afghan generation’ faces food insecurity says UN Official

    Afghanistan is in an unparalleled state of food insecurity and malnutrition as acute hunger has risen from 14 million in July, to 23 million in March, forcing households to resort to desperate measures to put food on the table.

    A staggering 95 per cent of Afghans are not getting enough to eat, with that number rising to almost 100 percent in female-headed households, according to Dr. Ramiz Alakbarov, UN Resident Coordinator in Afghanistan.

    “It is a figure so high that it is almost inconceivable. Yet, devastatingly, it is the harsh reality,” he said.

    Alakbarov painted a grim picture of hospital wards filled with malnourished children, many weighing at age one what an infant of six months would weigh in a developed country, with some “so weak they are unable to move”.

    “We cannot ignore the reality facing communities,” he said.

    Afghanistan continues to grapple with the effects of a terrible drought, the prospect of another bad harvest this year, a banking and financial crisis so severe that it has left more than 80 per cent of the population facing debt, and an increase in food and fuel prices.

    Hunger pangs

    “Enormous challenges lie ahead,” he said, reiterating that the UN and partners, are “doing everything we can” to alleviate the impacts of hunger and malnutrition, while giving communities the means to protect and sustain their livelihoods in the future.

    So far this year, humanitarian partners have supported 8.2 million people with life-saving and life-sustaining food assistance, including emergency food rations, school meals, agricultural supplies and nutritious foods and supplements for nursing mothers and their infants.

    Over the next months, the UN and its partners will continue to focus on scaling-up response activities, reaching previously underserved and remote areas that active conflict had rendered inaccessible.

    Explaining that the food insecurity and malnutrition crisis in the country was one of “unparalleled proportions”, the official said that acute hunger in the country rose from 14 million in July, to 23 million in March, forcing households to resort to “desperate measures” to put food on the table.

    Acutely malnourished children

    Acute malnutrition rates in 28 out of 34 provinces are high with more than 3.5 million children in need of nutrition treatment support, said Dr. Alakbarov.

    He explained that since mid-August, over 2,500 nutrition treatment sites across all 34 provinces, both urban and rural, have been serving 800,000 acutely malnourished children, “and we plan to reach 3.2 million affected children this year”.

    “We also aim to reach one million people through vocational skills training, one million children through school feeding, and millions more people both directly and indirectly through programmes that will protect and boost the agricultural livelihoods upon which so much of the population depends,” added the UN Representative.

    “Unacceptable trade-offs have caused untold suffering, reduced the quality, quantity, and diversity of food available, led to high levels of wasting in children, and other harmful impacts on the physical and mental wellbeing of women, men, and children,” he spelled out.

    Although a massive humanitarian response mounted since August has prevented “our worst fears from being realized over the winter,” Dr. Alakbarov reminded that food insecurity and malnutrition remain “at historic highs” and require an “immediate, sustained, and large-scale humanitarian response.”

    “The fate of an entire generation of Afghans is at stake,” he said, assuring that the UN would continue, over the coming weeks, to provide regular updates.

    “As we collectively support millions of Afghans to rebuild their lives and communities, we must remember that the long road to a better future is impossible on empty stomach,” Dr. Alakbarov said.

    A Budget that Looks Too Far Into the Future

    Social development expenditure and the needs of the people – both prior to COVID-19 but more so during and after the second wave, have not been emphasized in the current budget.

    By Varna Sri Raman and Dr. Pravas Mishra

    Now that the dust has settled on the initial debates around the Union budget, one can see that this year (2022-23) the budget is indeed visionary. Considering union government’s performance during the devastating second wave, the provisions made by the Finance Minister seem inadequate to say the least.

    While it is true that the budget provides lop-sided impetus for growth through supply-side interventions such as focusing on infrastructure development, the budget was silent on major demand-side measures and social sector spending. The budget was also odd in that it failed to actually be an accounting exercise which is the true purpose of the budget. For instance, there was no detail presented on what was actually achieved from the last budgetary outlays and schemes. It could have been stated that, for instance, government expenditure was being increased to augment social welfare schemes or to breathe some life into India’s near-dead SMEs – but nothing was said. In hindsight, the actual numbers in the budget, provide good reason for silence. Compared to the revised estimates for 2021-22, total expenditure (after accounting for inflation) is only likely to go up by a minuscule 4.6 per cent, hardly enough to revive a dying economy.

    The Union Government’s assertion about increase in Capital Expenditure (CAPEX), a collective term referring to capital or infrastructural investments by 35 per cent falls flat if detailed numbers are studied. The increase in CAPEX is at 35 per cent when Budget Estimate (BE) to BE comparison is made, but the BE is really a figure of little consequence. Instead from an accounting perspective, a comparison of BE should be done with the previous Revised Estimates (RE) and that comparison shows only a 24 per cent increase, so 10 per cent of the allocations are not new.  Turns out that to say that CAPEX has increased, the government (in this budget) looked at actual budgetary outlays and capital improvement provisions made by public sector enterprises (PSEs). But PSEs have actually allocated approximately seven per cent less money to this than last year – so in reality capital investments in the budget have gone up by only approximately 10 per cent.

    Neglecting social expenditure

    Social development expenditure and the needs of the people – both prior to COVID-19 but more so during and after the second wave, have not been emphasized in the current budget. The World Inequality Report 2022 depicts India as one of the most unequal countries in the world with widespread poverty along with a fast and ever-growing “affluent” class. Oxfam India’s report on inequality which states that the richest 98 Indians own the same wealth as the bottom 55.2 crore people, while 4.6 crore Indians fell into extreme poverty in 2020.

    As per the Center for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) some 1 crore people lost their jobs because of the second wave of the pandemic and 97 per cent of households’ incomes have declined since the beginning of the pandemic. Neglecting social expenditure and not focusing on getting money into the hands of citizens (i.e. increasing per capita personal disposable income) will only serve to increase income / wealth inequality further. Could something that focusses on revenue expenditure inducing direct demand in the economy by influencing consumption have been a better bet than something that will produce multiplier results in the far-flung future?

    Data demonstrates that the annual growth of tax revenue during 2019-20 contracted and then slightly increased. In 2022 the growth rate of tax collection was projected at 9 per cent which went up to 13 per cent in the revised estimates of the same year. Budget 2022-23 projects a 10 per cent growth in tax revenue indicating recovery of the economy. However, the measures to use this tax revenue for people’s welfare are missing from the budget. This could have increased social sector spending that focuses on investing in the health, education, and livelihood of everyone.

    Health, MGNREGA

    Study after study demonstrates that, for instance, a good education makes the likelihood of higher incomes and lower poverty much greater. However, the overall share of the education budget (as a proportion of the total Union Budget and the country’s GDP) has witnessed a decline in budget 2022-23. Ironically while acknowledging the loss to children via school closure during the pandemic, the finance minister announced more digital education via the ‘one class, one TV channel’ programme. Even if this were a good thing (for some of the channels are at least slated to be regional languages) the allocations for the PM e-Vidya has been reduced from Rs. 50 crore in 2021-22 (BE) to mere Rs 10 lakh for 2022-23 (BE). Specific school programmes which have been known to improve India’s languishing education and nutritional outcomes together – such as the mid-day meal programme and scholarships also witnessed a decline.

    Similarly, the total budgetary support in absolute amounts for the health sector stands at Rs. 89,251 crores for 2022-23; the share (as a proportion of the total Union Budget) has remained more or less stagnant over the last few years of the Modi government at a minuscule 2.26 per cent of the total budgetary expenditure in 2022-23 (BE). Indeed, allocations for the National Health Mission (NHM) declined in comparison to 2021-22(RE). This is despite a recorded deficit of doctors, paramedics and health equipment at the primary health centers and community health centers.

    Several economists have pointed out the role that MGNREGA plays in augmenting livelihoods in the pandemic and in conditions of extraordinary unemployment. In 2020-21, around 13.32 crore people applied for work under MGNREGS, of which 13.29 crore were given work, and close to 11.30 crore people had applied for work of which 11.22 crore had been offered work in 2021-22 (up to the first week of January 2022). Despite this, in the 2022-23 BE allocation for MGNREGA has declined by 25.5 per cent in comparison with the 2021-22 RE.

    Not visionary

    What can a government do to increase rates of growth? As any student of economics will tell, a government can try and inject the economy with hope. How does a government do that? Of course, by encouraging people to spend more, make loans cheaper, for instance, which is what India is trying to do with home loans now and encouraging more and more micro-borrowing by MSMEs and individuals. This is not efficient. In a situation of high inflation, making loans cheaper, puts money into the hands of a people pushed against the wall, while doing zilch for their actual ability to repay. With increase after increase in indirect taxes and no relief in direct tax concession India’s demand driven economy appears to have effectively been left to fend for itself. Except for a limited digital assets related tax, no surcharge on the super-rich to compensate for the loss of revenue nor a one-time wealth tax – does little to inject hope.

    While clean energy, electric vehicles, battery swapping policies etc., found a mention in the budget, none of the attendant infrastructure such as a much-needed revision in ethanol classification, detailing of a smart grid or power distribution infrastructure, climate resilience policy or agricultural inputs in support of small marginalised farmers that do not rely on fancy technology but instead focus on the fundamentals, find a mention. Ultimately implementation trumps vision. Yet, even the budgetary allocation utilization has proven to be a disappointment time and again. Sadly, the visionary budget appears only more and more blurry for the common man.

     

    Varna Sri Raman is a Lead-Research and Knowledge Building  and Dr Pravas Mishra is Assistant Manager – Research & Knowledge Management at Oxfam India.

     

    Image: Hippopx — Licenced to use Creative Commons Zero – CC0

    Social security for gig workers of Uber, Ola still a distant dream

    Drivers are saddled with the burden of repaying their loans and the deduction of commissions. Low earnings, the ratings game and algorithm-driven systems need to go hand-in-hand with stringent laws, strict enforcement, and proper disclosures by the aggregators.

    By Himani Mishra

    Bhavish Aggarwal tried to address the popular question “Why does my driver cancel my Ola ride?” in a tweet on 21 December 2021. He proposed that the issue can be redressed only if the driver knows the approximate location and payment mode. Rather than addressing the question from the driver’s perspective, the co-founder of Ola Cabs made sure that the revenues of the company would remain unaffected.

    A conversation with Ola drivers would have revealed that if riders agree with cancelling rides on the app and the driver is able to convince the rider to complete the ride offline, the drivers will be able to save lots of money. By completing the ride offline, the driver will not have to pay a commission to Ola or Uber, which goes up to 35 per cent of the fare. Aside from this, the drivers also have to shell out the money for insurance, maintenance and loan repayment out of their pockets, leaving hardly any money at the end of the month. Many of the drivers take loans to purchase cars. However, when revenues fall, paying monthly installments becomes increasingly difficult. Rising fuel bills and the COVID-19 pandemic made things worse. One of the main problems the drivers face today is the burden of repaying their loans. According to a survey published by Inc42, Ola and Uber lost over 30,000 cabs because of the drivers’ inability to make monthly payments.

    Unfair algorithms

    The aggregators charge 35 per cent commission despite the transport ministry stipulating that the maximum commission that can be charged is 20 per cent under the Motor Aggregator Guidelines 2020. The guidelines also stipulate the provision of health and term insurance coverage of Rs 5 lakh and Rs 10 lakh respectively with 5 per cent increase every year. As there is no supervising enforcement agency, the ride-hailing apps rarely comply with these norms. Conversations with Ola and Uber drivers reveal that Uber charges 20 per cent commission while Ola charges 30 per cent, blaming the extra 10 per cent on taxes. The drivers say that no insurance coverage is being provided by the aggregators at present.

    Low earnings, the ratings game and algorithm-driven systems cause a lot of stress for these drivers. Though both Ola and Uber announced their support for drivers who tested positive for COVID-19, they did not offer much support to the families of drivers who died due to COVID-19. While Ola gave no compensation to the families, Uber paid Rs 75,000 each to the families of deceased drivers.

    In the Fairwork India Report 2021, an annual study of working conditions of gig workers on digital platforms, Ola and Uber scored a shocking 0 /10. The five principles on which the report assessed the employers were fair pay, fair conditions, fair contracts, fair management and fair representation.

    Gig workers and labour codes

    Gig workers are not included or defined in the Wages Code 2019 or the Industrial Relations Code 2020. No state has included gig workers under scheduled employment. Only Social Security Code 2020 recognised the concept of gig and platform workers for the purpose of formulating appropriate social security schemes. In September 2021, the Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers (IFAT) filed a public interest litigation seeking an employer–employee relationship with the platforms they are associated with or included in under the Unorganized Workers Act, 2008 so that they can come under a social security system.

    According to IFAT, denying these workers social security has resulted in their exploitation through forced labour as defined in Article 23 of the Constitution and the right to livelihood in good and fair conditions. The failure to register them as unorganised employees and provide them with social security, it says, is a violation of their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.

    Global developments bring hope

    Court rulings worldwide have accepted employer-employee relationships between aggregators and drivers. In September 2021, a Dutch court held that “The legal relationship between Uber and these drivers meets all the characteristics of an employment contract,” in a case filed against Uber by the Federation of Dutch Trade Unions. After losing a Supreme Court appeal in February 2021 in the UK, Uber announced in March that it would recognise workers’ rights including minimum pay for the 70,000 plus British drivers associated with it. The UK court ruled that Uber must treat drivers as workers, giving them access to vacation pay, rest breaks and minimum wages while they are using the app. Uber also faced legal challenges in the US with the Supreme Court rejecting its attempt to dodge a lawsuit on whether its drivers are employees or independent contractors in May 2021.

    The Assembly Bill 5 authorised by the California Court was created to evaluate whether an individual should be classified as an independent contractor or an employee. To determine which qualification is accurate, ABC test was designed, which asks the following questions:

    • Is the individual free of the hiring firm’s control?
    • Is the individual delivering a service that is not the primary business of the hiring company?
    • Is the individual actually engaged in operating a business similar to the service offered to the hiring company?

    If answer is to all three questions is yes, they are classified as an independent contractor. However, if any of the question are answered negatively, an employment relationship is formed. A similar law can be enacted in India to establish employer-employee relationship between the drivers and the aggregators.

    Transparency

    The Supreme Court of India noted on May 24, 2021 that governments must speed up the registration of unorganised workers, gig workers and platform workers so that they would come under social security programmes. However, there is still silence on the authorities’ end about the employer-employee relationship which is gaining validation throughout the world.

    The government should make the Motor Aggregator Guidelines 2020 a law to provide legal protection to gig workers. Also, a designated law enforcement authority like state labour commissioners should be set up to ensure proper implementation of the law and redressal of complaints in case of non-adherence on the side of the cab aggregators.

    Transparency and disclosure are needed from cab aggregators in issues related to drivers. The companies should produce self-disclosure and compliance certificates showing their adherence to the Motor Aggregator Guidelines 2020 and publish them on their websites. The details furnished could include wages paid, commission charged, hours worked, insurance coverage given, ratings, and the number of passengers. This would induce public accountability among the aggregator apps, thus reducing the blur in the picture. As reported in the Fairwork Report, Urban Company has expressed its willingness to publish an earning index for its workers every six months. A similar model can be opted by other platform economy apps to ensure transparent operations.

    Workers, not contractors

    Criticism of gig work’s informal and independent contract nature is frequently countered by the claim that this type of job provides flexibility and gives workers the freedom to choose their working hours and location. The gig workers in India, however, opt for such options to earn a decent living. The lack of employment opportunities does not allow them to enjoy freedom and flexibility. The current situation, in which the livelihoods and health of a large workforce are in jeopardy, demonstrates that flexibility cannot come at the expense of basic human rights.

    Gig workers should get access to healthcare and financial support in case of a crisis. In this regard, the COVID-19 pandemic should be treated as a wakeup call to revamp social security systems for gig workers and to question their position as independent contractors. By ensuring legal and social security protection, the government can provide some respite to these workers who are already distressed by the effects of the pandemic.

    This piece has been sourced from Policy Circle — policycircle.org

    Himani Mishra is pursuing doctoral research at the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi.

     

    Image:

    ‘Responsible investment’ fuels Myanmar junta, claim rights groups

    Big corporations with financial stakes running into billions of dollars are closely tied to Myanmar’s military junta, says a financial investigation by rights groups.

    An investigation by rights groups has revealed that environmental, social and governance (ESG) investments have funnelled billions into companies arming, funding and legitimising the Myanmar military junta.

    Big corporations with financial stakes running into billions of dollars are closely tied to Myanmar’s military junta, says a financial investigation by Inclusive Development International and ALTSEAN-Burma, the findings reveal.

    Their report, “The Myanmar ESG Files: How ‘responsible investment’ is enabling a military dictatorship,” by the human rights advocacy groups documents how hundreds of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) funds reflect in the shares in 33 corporations linked to the military junta. Implicitly, the corporations and the ESG funds have enabled the regime’s grip on the country.

    Myanmar’s military junta has been accused of overthrowing a representative, democratic government in February 2021 and crimes against humanity.

    “Funds carrying the ESG label hold at least $13.4 billion worth of shares in 33 companies linked with the Myanmar military,” says the group’s findings.

    Some $40 trillion of professionally managed assets globally consider ESG factors. That is on track to exceed $53 trillion by 2025. With fees for ESG funds typically higher than conventional funds, consumers have been willing to pay a premium for these products.

    This “sustainable investment” received by big business in the strife-torn country includes weapon dealers supplying arms to the regime and tech services serving the military-controlled national police force and aid the government’s surveillance over its opponents and violently crush dissent.

    “Activists on the ground have been risking their lives and liberty to stop the flow of money, weapons and other resources that has allowed the military to maintain its illegitimate grip on power,” said Debbie Stothard, founder and coordinator of ALTSEAN-Burma. “It’s shocking and devastating to see so-called ‘responsible investment’ doing the opposite.”

    According to data compiled by Inclusive Development International, ESG-labelled funds continued to hold shares in these companies even after Myanmar’s military was found involved in the genocide perpetrated against the Rohingya. Similarly, the companies held the shares after the bloody coup and subsequent crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in February 2021.

    “That dozens of companies with ties to Myanmar’s genocidal regime are included in ESG portfolios shows just how large the gulf is between ‘responsible investment’ marketing claims and reality,” said David Pred, executive director of Inclusive Development International. “The foundation of this fraudulent industry is a deeply flawed ESG ratings system, which is in urgent need of regulation.”

     

    Image: Wikimedia

    Russia-Ukraine conflict: UN warns of a global hunger meltdown

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres has warned of an impending global food crisis due to the war between Russia and Ukraine. He said that the resulting meltdown of the global economy is provoking a hunger crisis that is hitting the poorest hardest.

    Besides the hour-to-hour devastation inside Ukraine, the UN chief said the war was reaching far beyond its borders, with a Sword of Damocles now hanging over the global economy – “especially the developing world”.

    Russia and Ukraine represent more than half of the world’s supply of sunflower oil and about 30 percent of the world’s wheat, he added, noting that Ukraine alone provides more than half of the World Food Programme’s (WFP) wheat supply.

    For months now, developing countries have been struggling to recover from the pandemic – with record inflation, rising interest rates and looming debt burdens, while their ability to respond has been “erased by exponential increases in the cost of financing.

    “Their breadbasket is being bombed”, Secretary-General Guterres said.

    “Food, fuel and fertilizer prices are skyrocketing.  Supply chains are being disrupted.  And the costs and delays of transportation of imported goods – when available – are at record levels.

    “All of this is hitting the poorest the hardest and planting the seeds for political instability and unrest around the globe.”

    ‘Hurricane of hunger’

    António Guterres said 45 African and least developed countries import at least a third of their wheat from Ukraine or Russia, with 18 of those, import at least 50 percent.

    “We must do everything possible to avert a hurricane of hunger and a meltdown of the global food system. In addition, we are seeing clear evidence of this war draining resources and attention from other trouble-spots in desperate need.

    “In a word, developing countries are getting pummelled. They face a cascade of crises – beyond the Ukraine war, we cannot forget COVID and the impacts of climate change – in particular, drought.”

    WFP had already warned that 2022 would be a year of catastrophic hunger, with 44 million people in 38 countries teetering on the edge of famine.

    With Ukrainian ports closed and Russian grain deals on pause because of sanctions, 13.5 million tons of wheat and 16 million tons of maize are currently frozen in Russia and Ukraine, WFP has said. The wheat imports, on which millions of people are heavily dependent is hitting the world’s poorest the most, particularly in Afghanistan, Ethiopia and Syria.

    Diplomatic path

    “It is time to stop the horror unleashed on the people of Ukraine and get on the path of diplomacy and peace”, he said, noting that he had been in close contact with countries including China, France, Germany, India, Israel and Turkey – on mediation efforts to end Russia’s invasion.

    “The appeals for peace must be heard. This tragedy must stop. It is never too late for diplomacy and dialogue. We need an immediate cessation of hostilities and serious negotiations based on the principles of the UN Charter and international law.”

    We need peace now, he added. “Peace for the people of Ukraine. Peace for our world.”

     

    Image: WFP

    The Future of Food: Jellyfish, Farmed Insects, 3D Printed Meat?

    A report by the Food and Agriculture Organization looks at how economic growth, changing consumer behaviour and consumption patterns, a growing global population and the climate crisis will shape food safety in tomorrow’s world.

    By Inter Press Service

    Between the devastating effects of climate change and the fast advancing new technologies, it seems now evident that the future of food will change. Whether it’s new foods like jellyfish, edible insects and cell-based meat, or new technologies like blockchain, artificial intelligence and nanotechnology, the future promises exciting opportunities for feeding the world, says a new report.

    “However, the time to start preparing for any potential safety concerns is now.”

    A recent report by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) looks at how major global drivers like economic growth, changing consumer behaviour and consumption patterns, a growing global population and the climate crisis will shape food safety in tomorrow’s world.

    “We are in an era where technological and scientific innovations are revolutionising the agrifood sector, including the food safety arena. It is important for countries to keep pace with these advances, particularly in a critical area like food safety, and for FAO to provide proactive advice on the application of science and innovation,” said FAO Chief Scientist Ismahane Elouafi.

    The report, Thinking about the future of food safety – A foresight report — maps out some of the most important emerging issues in food and agriculture with a focus on food safety implications, which are increasingly on the minds of consumers around the world.

    It adopts a foresight approach based on the idea that the roots of how the future may play out are already present today in the form of early signs. Monitoring these signs through the systematic gathering of intelligence increases the likelihood that policy makers will be better prepared to tackle emerging opportunities and challenges.

    Key drivers and trends

    The report covers eight broad categories of drivers and trends: climate change, new food sources and production systems, the growing number of farms and vegetable gardens in our cities, changing consumer behaviour, the circular economy, microbiome science (which studies the bacteria, viruses and fungi inside our guts and around us), technological and scientific innovation, and food fraud.

    Here are some of the report’s most interesting findings:

    Increased exposure to contaminants – The impact of changing weather patterns and temperatures has been receiving much attention, and FAO recently issued a report on the implications of climate change on food safety in 2020.

    Recent evidence points to a severe impact of climate change on various biological and chemical contaminants in food by altering their virulence, occurrence and distribution.

    Traditionally cooler zones are becoming warmer and more conducive to agriculture, opening up new habitats for agricultural pests and toxic fungal species. For instance, aflatoxins, which were traditionally considered a problem mainly in some parts of Africa, are now established in the Mediterranean.

    Jellyfish, algae, and insects
    Edible varieties of jellyfish have been consumed for generations in some parts of Asia. They are low in carbohydrates and high in protein content but tend to spoil easily at ambient temperatures and can serve as vectors of pathogenic bacteria that can adversely affect human health.

    Seaweed consumption is also spreading beyond Asia and is expected to continue growing, in part because of its nutritional value and sustainability (seaweeds do not need fertilisers to grow and help combat ocean acidification).

    One potential source of concern is their ability to accumulate high levels of heavy metals like arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury. Interest in edible insects is also rising in response to growing awareness of the environmental impacts of food production.

    While they can be a good source of protein, fibre, fatty acids, and micronutrients like iron, zinc, manganese and magnesium, they can harbour foodborne contaminants and can provoke allergic reactions in some people.

    Farming Insects

    In another report, FAO says that while insect consumption by humans or entomophagy has been traditionally practiced in various countries over generations and represents a common dietary component of various animal species (birds, fish, mammals), farming of insects for human food and animal feed is relatively recent.

    “Production of this ‘mini-livestock’ brings with it several potential benefits and challenges.”

    Plant-based alternatives

    More and more people are becoming vegan or vegetarian, often citing concerns for animal welfare and livestock’s impact on the environment. This has led to the development of various plant-based alternatives to meat, with global sales for such products expected to surge.

    As plant-based diets expand, more awareness about introducing food safety concerns, such as allergens from foods not commonly consumed before, is needed.

    Cell-based meat

    Winston Churchill’s prophecy – that one day “we shall escape the absurdity of growing a whole chicken in order to eat the breast or wing, by growing these parts separately under a suitable medium” – is becoming a reality, with dozens of companies globally known to be developing cell-based steaks, beef burgers or chicken nuggets.

    “Examples of potential concerns include the use of animal-based serum in the culture media, which may introduce both microbiological and chemical contamination.”

    New technologies

    A veritable technological revolution is transforming our agrifood systems, helping us produce more with less. Examples include smart packaging that extends the shelf-life of food products, blockchain technology that ensures food can be traced along supply chains, and 3D printers that produce sweets and even “meat-like” textures using plant-based ingredients.

    As with all emerging technologies, there are opportunities and challenges, adds the new FAO report.

    Food safety

    Coinciding with the launch of the report, FAO and the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced that this year’s edition of World Food Safety Day, to be held on 7 June, will focus on the theme of “Safer food, better health.”

    The World Day will focus, among other aspects, on the fact that food safety saves lives. It is not only a crucial component to food security, but it also plays a vital role in reducing foodborne disease.

    “Every year, 600 million people fall sick as a result of around 200 different types of foodborne illness. The burden of such illness falls most heavily on the poor and on the young. In addition, foodborne illness is responsible for 420 000 preventable deaths every year.”

     

    Image: Hippopx — Licensed to use under Creative Commons Zero – CC0